User talk:Columnistvivek

for add category on article Sadguru_Brahmeshanand_Acharya_Swami
 * I'm assuming you want to add an already existing category, simply put at the bottom(without the "nowiki" tags I have here to suppress that function). 331dot (talk) 09:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Thakor Laxmanji Punjaji for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Thakor Laxmanji Punjaji is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Thakor Laxmanji Punjaji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Mccapra (talk) 20:04, 2 January 2023 (UTC)

Sudhir S. Mehta moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Sudhir S. Mehta, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more in-depth coverage about the subject itself, with citations from reliable, independent sources in order to show it meets WP:GNG. It should have at least three. And please remember that interviews, as primary sources, do not count towards GNG. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel 5969  TT me 13:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sudhir Mehta (disambiguation)


A tag has been placed on Sudhir Mehta (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a disambiguation page which either
 * disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
 * disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
 * is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the. Certes (talk) 18:18, 8 January 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Panara Chandrashekhar for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Panara Chandrashekhar is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Panara Chandrashekhar until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Oaktree b (talk) 21:36, 10 January 2023 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of &#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Pcmishradigital. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:53, 14 January 2023 (UTC)

Columnistvivek (talk) 18:55, 16 January 2023 (UTC)

Working through an admin like you and I will not do such mistake in future I assure you for this please activate my account thank you}}

 Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive. ([ block log] • [ active blocks] • [ global blocks] • [//tools.wmflabs.org/xtools/autoblock/?user=&project=en.wikipedia.org autoblocks] • contribs • deleted contribs • [ abuse filter log] • [ creation log] • change block settings • [ unblock] • [ checkuser] ([ log]) )

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System. Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 00:28, 24 January 2023 (UTC) I recieved your email; as you do not have access to this page, you must request unblock via WP:UTRS. 331dot (talk) 07:53, 24 March 2023 (UTC)


 * How delightful -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 18:34, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
 * I also received your e-mail. E-mailing administrators directly is not the way to appeal your block. Please read through the link that gave you if you have not already done so. Thank you.  Girth Summit  (blether)  12:42, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
 * And, please. before requesting unblocking at UTRS, read the WP:GAB. Please concisely and clearly describe how you merited blocking, what you would do differently, and what constructive edits you would make. Thanks -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 13:44, 25 March 2023 (UTC)