User talk:ComSpex

Login required to edit

 * Login

Notice
Users generally are permitted to remove and archive comments at their discretion, except in cases of warnings, which they are generally prohibited from removing, especially where the intention of the removal is to mislead other editors.

Much ado about nothing

 * /Any hidden is more reviewed than exposed.
 * /A soapbox of a user

WP:Sock
A consensus of editors appears to be behind User:Dijxtra's proposal to make a clean distinction between types of alternate accounts. We are moving ahead with it now and could use your help. As per the talk page discussion, I am placing the following table on the Sock puppetry page. Please help edit it and the rest of the page to match.
 * Thanks, Dragon&#39;s Blood 04:16, 3 May 2006 (UTC)

Question to JRM about civility
Hi. As JRM doesn't seem to edit all that often (not once since February), I'll try to help. "This" is the fact that WP as a whole is not particularly respectful of contributions. Let me reword the rest of the sentence: This makes either praise or criticism of edits all the more pronounced when it does occur -- "it" now means "either praise or criticism of edits". I don't think that praise needs to be mentioned here. Rather, the point might be: Editors aren't usually thanked for their work, and so many editors feel underappreciated even before their edits are criticized. If their edits aren't merely ignored but are also criticized, they may be very aggrieved.

Of course, I'm not JRM, who may disagree with all that I've said. -- 白髪 07:45, 10 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thank you for your reply, 白髪さん. Can you happen to read and write in Japanese language? If you can and you could help translating even a paragraph of the Japanese version, Japanese members including me will be very glad of it. Well, I wish the original sentence or section would be reworded and/or rewritten by you since your rewording and interpretation above is much easier for me to understand and as well translate.--ComSpex 09:09, 10 May 2006 (UTC)