User talk:Comason

Hi!
This is the Talk Page of Comason. I am not at my desk right now, but if you leave a message, I'll get back to you as soon as I can.

For ease of reference:-

Note that I'm not in the habit of keeping extensive archives - if it's been dealt with, it gets deleted. Check out the page's History for reference.

Cheers!

Comason (talk) 15:19, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Policy Stuff
Basics


 * Wikipedia Tutorial
 * How to edit a page
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Manual of Style
 * Be bold in editing
 * How to write a great article
 * WikiProjects

Getting your info out there


 * Cite your sources
 * Neutral Point of View
 * Point of View
 * Verifiability
 * Uploading images
 * Image use policy

Getting more Wikipedia rules


 * Policy Library

Getting help


 * New contributors' help page
 * Where to ask a question
 * Help Desk
 * Frequently Asked Questions

Getting along


 * Wikipedians
 * Wikiquette
 * Civility
 * Sign your posts
 * Conflict resolution

Getting technical


 * Pages needing attention
 * Peer review
 * Utilities
 * Village pump

Your changes at Freemasonry
I think your edit took us into areas that really are of only secondary importance to Understanding Freemasonry. To my mind, we don't need to explain why the continental Masons dropped the requirement for a belief in deity... What matters is that they did so, and that this resulted in a schism in the fraternity.

If you disagree... raise the issue on the article talk page, so other editors can give their opinion on the issue. We can then edit according to consensus. Blueboar (talk) 15:40, 31 July 2011 (UTC)
 * If we can add that to a Freemasonry in France-type article, that would be good (assuming the sources as to why are not OR), because that is fundamental to the GLNF/GOdF difference, and it might be useful in GOdF in a truncated format, but in a top level article like Freemasonry, it's too much detail on the topic. MSJapan (talk) 17:52, 3 August 2011 (UTC)
 * Ideally, we add it to Freemasonry in France, because that article is terribly bad, and this is a good starting point for a major part of it. I assume the sources are not OR? MSJapan (talk) 00:07, 8 August 2011 (UTC)