User talk:Comerford1

October 2022
Hello, I'm Muboshgu. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions&#32;to Revolution of Dignity have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. – Muboshgu (talk) 23:40, 17 October 2022 (UTC)

Hi Comerford1! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Alana Smith (skateboarder) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree&#32;at, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jim Allister. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Yee no  (talk) 00:41, 18 October 2022 (UTC)

Important notices
Hi Comerford1. Please see the notice below about heightened rules in a sensitive topic area. I know these notices can be intimidating, especially when delivered by someone in the midst of an editing dispute with you, but I want to emphasize the standardized nature of the notice and the "does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions".

Firefangledfeathers (talk / contribs) 00:34, 18 October 2022 (UTC)