User talk:Comingattractions

2008 attack at Beijing Drum Tower during Olympics
May I be so bold as to ask why you removed the RfC I put on the talk page of the above? I sincerely hope there is a good reason it was removed without so much as a 'how do you do?" I hope it's got nothing to do with my ignorance, or my "not being an overly nice person" ;-) Ohconfucius (talk) 13:51, 9 January 2009 (UTC)

2008 Beijing Drum Tower stabbings
There was a formal requested move, as I know you were aware of given your edit to the talk page to revert to an earlier version. I closed that discussion as a disinterested third party and moved it to the suggested name after reviewing the previous discussion. This article has been the subject of a move war (I have not checked whether you participated in that) but this article shold not be moved again without appropriate discussion. That means you should make a requested move if you wish to have the article moved to a new name, as I urged everyone to do in the closing of the move request. Also, the page has an archive. It is listed in the header box at the top of the page and looks like this: Archives: 1. That is where the past discussion from the talk page resides. There is no "censorship" as you asserted in your edit summary, upon your reversion to a previous time (which also removed all later discussion including the move request).--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 14:45, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text  below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.


 * also it is clear that Fuhgettaboutit is in collusion with Ohconfucius, a user that is known to be troublesome. he or she is more than six months later still trying to accomplish their narrow goals. Comingattractions (talk) 04:39, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Block reviewing admin: in addition to seeing my post directly above the block template, please see for background discussion on my talk page, here. Happy reading.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 04:46, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * Fughettaboutit, clearly you are trying to influence action. this is contrary to Wikipedia guidelines and principles. this would be termed as a kangaroo court action. I am sure you won't deny knowing or working with Ohconfucius who has lost his or her case over and over. by censoring you have obliterated mentions of the above. additionally there is no way to go back and read about the discussions now, unless additional reverts are made. lastly, I was unaware that you offered to start a move discussion. I would have availed myself of that opportunity; but, something must be done about Ohconfucius. it doesn't matter how many thousands of edits this user has made, they are asking to be permanently banned by their actions. also without being able to contact you, Fughettaboutit, I can not rectify any situations. Comingattractions (talk) 05:00, 5 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Hi again Comingattractions. The nature of a kangaroo court is not providing relevant evidence and material, but reaching a decision that you want to come to and then trumping up evidence to come to that already foregone result. Don't you agree that a reviewing admin should have the benefit of reading the relevant dicussion on my talk page? On that score, I spent a chunk of time today responding to your post. Please read it. That is where I offered to make a requested move discussion for you. As for your unsupported collusion allegation, I can only sigh. The beauty of Wikipedia is that it is such an open platform. The entirety of my contact with Ohconfucius is the discussion on my talk page which resulted after you unilaterally reversed the page move after following my close of the requested move discussion.--Fuhghettaboutit (talk) 05:17, 5 April 2009 (UTC)


 * wow, this is borderline silly. you are not aware of how strange and dangerous it is to allow users like Ohconfucius to do what they please. I am very able to prove my point.
 * if you want to discuss this with me, fine. I wasn't aware you even have such conversations on here. no, I disagree totally with your "inept" ways. again, I can demonstrate to you how faulty your behavior has been. you are not talking to a novice user; I have been on here as long as you and Ohconfucius put together. instead of sighing, how about paying attention to facts. you are in a discussion with an advanced user, not a junior high school student. any thoughts on your part how you can listen to my points and when you see what I say is true, take more thoughtful action? Ohconfucius exercised some folly in that they said themselves that they have been "patiently waiting this out". it is very clear that they lost. you can go back to September and read how that is a fact. Comingattractions (talk) 05:23, 5 April 2009 (UTC)