User talk:Comint

Genesis EW

--Comint 13:04, 5 November 2007 (UTC)hello and welcome

memo: Deletion_review

Genesis EW and related articles
Hello Comint, I've recenty nominated several of your articles for deletion. The article Genesis EW you created doesn't appear to be notable enough for inclusion in Wikipedia. I nominated several related articles you created for the same reason. If you'd like to contest this and argue your point of view please see this article's AfD page. DraxusD 03:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Gencom ui++
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gencom ui++, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gencom ui++ is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gencom ui++, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of GenCOM UI++
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on GenCOM UI++, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because GenCOM UI++ is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting GenCOM UI++, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:57, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Gencom specview
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gencom specview, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gencom specview is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gencom specview, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of GenCOM Specview
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on GenCOM Specview, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because GenCOM Specview is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting GenCOM Specview, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of GenCOM SpecView
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on GenCOM SpecView, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because GenCOM SpecView is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting GenCOM SpecView, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:58, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of GenCOM SimGen
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on GenCOM SimGen, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because GenCOM SimGen is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting GenCOM SimGen, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Gencom simgen
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Gencom simgen, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Gencom simgen is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Gencom simgen, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of GenCOM SimPro
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on GenCOM SimPro, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because GenCOM SimPro is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1). To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting GenCOM SimPro, please affix the template to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 23:11, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gencom cycle.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gencom cycle.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Gencom scheme.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gencom scheme.JPG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:33, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (Image:EOB results.GIF)
Thanks for uploading Image:EOB results.GIF. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 19:39, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Logo
I notice you have uploaded the image Image:Gencom cycle.JPG with the fair use image tag. However, this tag seems unrelated to the content of the image, and as a result it may qualify for speedy deletion. Image:Gencom cycle.JPG has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message.

If you can find a valid tag that expresses why Image:Gencom cycle.JPG can be used under the fair use guidelines, please replace the tag that you have placed on it with that tag. If no such tag exists, please add the tag, along with a brief explanation of why this constitutes fair use of the image. If the image has been deleted, you can re-upload it, but please ensure you place the correct tag on it. However, you must not remove the speedy deletion notice. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. The Evil Spartan 19:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Recreated material
A tag has been placed on, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a. If you can indicate how GenCOM Suite is different from the previously posted material, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template hangon underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:GenCOM Suite saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we request you to follow these instructions. The Evil Spartan 19:03, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * As a note, if you believe the deletion was unjustified, you can try deletion review. The Evil Spartan 19:05, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
 * If you wish to win any support:
 * Do not simply repost the same stuff - use deletion review like the evil man says
 * do not post the same stuff on multiple titles - see this moan.
 * -- RHaworth 09:41, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use Image:Gencom cycle.JPG
Thanks for uploading Image:Gencom cycle.JPG. I noticed the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:


 * 1) Go to the image description page and edit it to add, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
 * 2) On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on [ this link]. Note that fair use images which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 7 days after this notification, per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.  Maxim (talk)  23:54, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Gencom cycle.JPG)
Thanks for uploading Image:Gencom cycle.JPG. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:33, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

re:Deletion of COMINT metadata and Electronig order of Battle
before taking any further actions, please refere to the talk pages of these articles, or to this comment or perhaps, please contact me on my user page.

regards. Comint 07:48, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Hi Comint, and thanks for the response. I believe you may be looking for WP:DELREV- a way to ask for a deletion to be reviewed. You might also try asking the administrator again for his deletion rationale. However, if you use deletion review, you will probably need to talk about the concerns brought up at the deletion discussion: Articles for deletion/Genesis EW. For now, I see that the concerns are that the page does not reference any other sources to prove its notability: in this case, you might be interested in WP:RS and WP:CORP, especially for Genesis EW. You will certainly wish to prove the notability of the subject with third party references. I hope this helps. The Evil Spartan 19:24, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free media (Image:EOB results.GIF)
Thanks for uploading Image:EOB results.GIF. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 06:06, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

deletion of COMINT metadata and Electronic Order of Battle (copied from here)
hello. following your decision at these articles' del-rev i'd like to know what should be done in order to make these articles legit, in you opinion. since i do believe that they are notable and should exist, i'd like your guidance. please respond to my talk page. many thanks, Comint 07:33, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
 * Develop draft articles on each topic in your user space using only material from reliable sources that are independent of either topic. Once that is done, return to WP:DRV and request that the articles be restored using your draft articles as the content for those articles. -- Jreferee   T / C  07:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:GenCOM EOB snapshot.GIF
Thank you for uploading Image:GenCOM EOB snapshot.GIF. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 11:36, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

EOB addition to SIGINT

 * Thanks for the addition of the EOB material to SIGINT. I fixed an obvious typo in a link. As mentioned previously on your talk page, there is concern that there is too much reference to Genesis products, and that the additional material reads too much like an advertisement.


 * While I agree that the generic idea of EOB is quite appropriate, I do have some specific concerns. I have tried to stay away from the term ESM, since I find that tends to have a tactical EW orientation, and developing an EOB easily can involve national-level assets. If we can come up with a more meaningful definition of ESM, that would be excellent. In US practice, however, I find it's a way to avoid saying SIGINT in a tactical context.


 * Also, title = Defense Scientific and Technical Information Center is a large data base; I believe that an appropriate reference would need to be a specific document in DSTIC.


 * In like manner, http://www.aiaa.org/content.cfm?pageid=406&gTable=mtgpaper&gID=61238 appears to point to a document that is not available without purchase. While it is useful to point to extended abstracts of such documents, I'm inclined to say the AIAA abstract needs more detail, or perhaps you could find a paper that is fully available?


 * Are the graphics all in the public domain and preferably in the Commons?


 * I'm certainly aware of things that are classified, but if there are no public sources on them, I don't think we can use unsourced references such as "Hence, most real life examples are confidential, though it is known that before operation Desert Storm for example, Iraqi forces were mapped and monitored, before and during the operation, also by monitoring and locating the units' radio equipment." Thanks! Howard C. Berkowitz 15:37, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

I assume i took care of the concern that some of the material reads too much like an advertisement or at least i hope so: Since we all agree that examples are necessary, i don't find the reference to one product or another irrelevant. Furthermore - since it is an open source, i'm sure that more examples could be find and added and i more than welcome it. Take for notice that there is a great picture of Rohde&Schwartz spectrum analyzer, although you can find the same product by other manufacturers. But- if you find a particular paragraph irrelevant, i will more than appreciate it if you make me notice and change it as needed.

As to the graphics - well they are all in the Commons indeed.

As to your last paragraph: There are very few examples, such as the Desert Storm example that i've mentioned and added a referance. Even though, i find it necessary, for the liability, to mention that no much example could be found, and the reason for that. Do you think otherwise / have another idea?

As to ESM vs. SIGINT - as much as i know, ESM is the more specific and accurate definition to electronic support, hence passive interception of electromagnetic waves, which commonly used by tactical SIGINT. While SIGINT refers to any kind of SIGNALS interception, which includes EM waves (ESM), acoustic waves, light waves and any signal platform for the use of communications or detection, ESM is limited only to the concept of electromagnetic waves interception. Would you accept these exceptions?

Thank you for your remarks Comint 09:48, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * Admittedly from my own experience, I have found ES to be more of a euphemism when one does not want to say SIGINT or ELINT. Quoting, however, from the US definition, "electronic warfare support — Division of electronic warfare involving actions tasked by, or under direct control of, an operational commander to search for, intercept, identify, and locate or localize sources of intentional and unintentional radiated electromagnetic energy for the purpose of immediate threat recognition, targeting, planning and conduct of future operations. Also called ES. See also electronic attack; electronic protection; electronic warfare. (JP 3-13.1)


 * If there is a single key point here, it is that ES is direct support and responsive to a commander, as opposed to the ELINT subset of SIGINT, which is the province of national intelligence. EOB, however, is not an immediate tactical need, as indicated by the extensive set of national data bases on it, maintained by the Joint Spectrum Center and Defense Intelligence Agency in the US. I would welcome definitions from other countries.


 * Let me propose a hierarchy, hoping this formats correctly; Intelligence collection disciplines, including SIGINT and MASINT.
 * Under SIGINT is COMINT, ELINT, and, although it is more problematic, FISINT. There are also general methods such as direction finding and traffic analysis.
 * EW includes both tactical SIGINT, but also ECM and ECCM. ES is now under the [[electronic warfare[[ article. EW and SIGINT are related but different


 * "While SIGINT refers to any kind of SIGNALS interception, which includes EM waves (ESM), acoustic waves, light waves and any signal platform for the use of communications or detection, ESM is limited only to the concept of electromagnetic waves interception." I would disagree emphatically. For acoustic waves, it is the non-SIGINT discipline of Geophysical MASINT. For light waves, it is Electro-optical MASINT. For unintentional electromagnetic waves, it is Radiofrequency MASINT.


 * If ES is considered tactical EW, I'm not sure I see EOB, a more analytic discipline, as part of it. Were the main topic EW, it is generally accepted that ECM, ECCM, and ES falls under it. EW includes both tactical COMINT (e.g., shut down a tactical voice channel) or ELINT (e.g., jam a radar).


 * As far as examples, I believe they do exist. It was not terribly difficult to find and cite a detailed article from the Joint Spectrum Center. There are the Australian examples from Desert Storm. Look under "Poobah's Party" for taking down the Iraqi strategic air defenses. ISTR examples from the Balkans in a tactical context, including the counterexample of the EH-60 Quickfix standard equipment not being useful, because it is oriented toward line-of-sight VHF. For it to be useful, a field modification needed to be made to put a commercial wideband receiver on board.


 * I really didn't follow your explanations of manual versus automatic EOB buildup.


 * With graphics, the key thing is that they show unique detail. I pulled the spectrum analyzer from an existing article. On thinking about it, it would be more useful to have a line drawing of an abstract drawing showing a frequency domain display, which I can make when I have time. I'd like to contrast that with a time domain display, although that's more of a challenge to my drawing skills. Howard C. Berkowitz 16:28, 28 October 2007 (UTC)


 * With response to yours at User_talk:Comint#EOB_addition_to_SIGINT:

First - thank you for an intelligent and enlightening conversation.
 * And to the point - i have some disagreements with you on the definitions but since its all semantics, i'm not sure one of us will convince the otherone. One thing i'm sure about is that SIGINT is basically a pasive intelligence gathering concept, hence frequency blocking for examples or any other ECM technics would not follow under COMINT nor ELINT.


 * Part of the problem, here, is that EW and SIGINT do not fit into a common structure, although they are related. In general, I would agree that active measures are EW and not SIGINT, with the exception of provocative methods where something that is basically for collection approaches a border, or turns on active emitters, to try to get the other side to turn on its emitters.


 * My recommendation would be to write up EW as a separate subject, including EA, ECCM, and, only as a brief mention, ES as a cross-reference to the type of SIGINT involved. EA and ECCM are active while SIGINT is generally passive, so forcing ES under EW winds up being confusing. May I suggest "ES is the subset of SIGINT that directly supports active EW", with further discussion of ES to be under SIGINT/COMINT/ELINT, perhaps separating tactical and strategic?


 * As to EOB - true - it is not so simple analysis, though it is quite tactical. Although it can be performed on a national level for long term analysis', it is also a technique that is commonly used near batlefield, by brigade intelligence level, with on-line information flow and immediate decisions making by on-field analysts with direct contact to the combatie forces. So, in a way, i can't see if it's more SIGINT or more ESM, unless there is no much differences between them as long as dealing with EM waves interception. Well, to be honest, i'm not that sure where to draw the line.


 * I would draw the line between tactical and strategic is that tactical implies immediate action. That action is most likely EA/ECM, but could involve turning on an ECCM capability, or even going to EMCON. In MASINT, there is a distinct phase of collecting a set of measurements, so you can recognize a signature of something significant. There is, I believe, a parallel here. EOB is in that preparatory phase of data collection. Once you have the EOB, if you were commanding a tank brigade and you became aware that the other side was issuing launch orders to a large-scale antitank weapon such as JSOW, you'd probably attack their communications. If you were commanding a radar and realized that they were targeting you with anti-radiation weapons, you'd change your signature, change to a different platform, or go into EMCON. I see an important distinction in time scale here -- EOB must exist before you can have a meaningful tactical response to a signal.


 * about manually or automatic EOB build-up - i'm not sure i get your question. Was my explanation unclear, or the whole idea? just to make sure i'll give you the answers you're looking for.

The fundamental concept of manual vs. automatic seems an artificial distinction. Automatic may include additional equipment or algorithms, and, if those are significant, they should be described. If they are no more than a speeded-up manual process, or if the algorithms cannot be described, I see little point in making the distinction at all. Howard C. Berkowitz 09:29, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

File source problem with File:GenCOM EOB snapshot.GIF
Thanks for uploading File:GenCOM EOB snapshot.GIF. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 12:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:GenCOM EOB snapshot.GIF
Thanks for uploading File:GenCOM EOB snapshot.GIF. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file agreed to license it under the given license.

If you created this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either
 * make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
 * Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to , stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to .

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Non-free content, use a tag such as or one of the other tags listed at Image copyright tags, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. IngerAlHaosului (talk) 12:28, 13 March 2010 (UTC)