User talk:Commando1664

Operation Provide Comfort – UK contribution
Hi

You said that the UK contribution to Operation Provide Comfort was Operation Haven, not Operation Safe Haven. But the eliteukforces link says Safe Haven and I’ve found another BBC link that says Safe Haven. I found another link that says both names. The Royal Marines website was no help. Were the names interchangeable? Unofficial? One British and one American? I’m going to leave it for now but do a little more digging around. If you have a definitive source (if there is one), that would be great. Chwyatt (talk) 11:17, 20 May 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, not sure about a reference, but I actually took part in the operation. officially it was called Operation HAVEN, but the media seemed to insist on calling it Operation SAFE HAVEN after the so-called "safe havens" which we established for the Kurds. I am sure the misnomer is a result of this confusion. I am in no doubt that the official name was HAVEN. (Of note the UN used the same idea in parts of Bosnia later - Srebrenica - with disastrous results.) Commando1664 (talk) 11:41, 20 May 2008 (UTC)


 * Fair enough. Come to think of it, HAVEN is more consistent with one word operation names for British ops. Cheers Chwyatt (talk) 07:19, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs
Hello Commando1664! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created  is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current Category:All_unreferenced_BLPs article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the unreferencedBLP tag. Here is the article:

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 04:47, 17 January 2010 (UTC)
 * 1) Satish Nambiar -

Speedy deletion nomination of Ian Riches


A tag has been placed on Ian Riches requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from independent.co.uk/news/obituaries/obituary--general-sir-ian-riches-1281967.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lyndaship (talk) 18:33, 19 May 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Rudolf Sieckenius.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Rudolf Sieckenius.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 14 June 2024 (UTC)