User talk:Compdude123/Archive 1

Welcome
Welcome! Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:
 * The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Editing tutorial
 * Picture tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Naming conventions
 * Manual of Style

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia:
 * Respect copyrights – do not copy and paste text or images directly from other websites.
 * Maintain a neutral point of view – this is possibly the most important Wikipedia policy.
 * Take particular care while adding biographical material about a  living person to any Wikipedia page. Particularly, controversial and negative statements should be referenced to multiple reliable sources.
 * No edit warring and sockpuppetry.
 * If you are testing, please use the Sandbox to [ do so].
 * Do not add troublesome content to any article, such as: copyrighted text, libel, advertising or promotional messages, and text that is not related to an article's subject. Deliberately adding such content or otherwise editing articles maliciously is considered vandalism, doing so will result your account or IP being blocked from editing.
 * Lastly, if you are editing an article about an individual or group of people, please adhere to Wikipedia's Biography of Living Persons' policy.

The Wikipedia Tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: &#126;&#126;&#126;&#126; (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Dave ♠♣♥♦1185♪♫™ 14:27, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Re your note at File:Horizon brand new.jpg
Per WP:NFCC #1, where it says "...or could be created", we do not retain non-free content until such time as free content is available if free content CAN be created. One or more planes now exist in this livery. All it takes to generate the free content is for a Wikipedia editor to take a photograph of one and upload it here under a free license. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:07, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Another case example; Livestrong Sporting Park. This stadium just recently completed construction. While it was under construction we permitted the use of the artist's conception image File:SKC stadium.png. Now that the stadium is complete, and in fact has been used at least once, free content imagery can be created of it. So, it goes away now. --Hammersoft (talk) 22:10, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Yes, I understand. Guess I'll put a note on the Horizon Air talk page with a request for someone to take a picture.  &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 22:16, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
 * I've re-added the orphaned tag and removed it from Horizon Air. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 22:30, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Civility in edit summaries
With all due respect, that edit summary wasn't very nice. The user has been helpful in a variety of other articles, a simple undoing of his edits with a more helpful explanation would have been more appropriate, especially since it's a very common mistake. Please remember to be civil and to avoid biting the newcomers. Thank you - CharlieEchoTango (talk) 23:31, 22 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Yes, you're right. Guess I need to be a little more careful about what I say in my edit summaries. -Compdude123 (talk) 02:03, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Alaska Airlines
Hi, I disagree with you reverting the edit to Alaska Airlines. The reason i removed it because of This Policy. Thats just the rules, i dont make them. To have this information in the table it would be against the policy. --JetBlast (talk) 02:29, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * I've seen this policy before, but I had no idea that it discouraged the information you removed. The policy page isn't really clear, as it doesn't specifically state that inflight entertainment (IFE) info is not to be included in the table.  If it did say "You should not put any information about the type of inflight entertainment installed on certain aircraft types" then I wouldn't have reverted your edit.
 * Also, many other airline articles list stuff about In-flight entertainment in their table. Anyway the Wikiproject Airlines policy is not all that clear as to what goes in tables and what doesn't.  This should be brought up on the WikiProject Airlines talk page before you remove this info from other airlines' tables.  And I'm probably not going to be the only user reverting your edits.  Anyway, enough said.  &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 03:06, 23 October 2011 (UTC)
 * It clearly sates "Other material should be limited to seating, aircraft on order and route information" - So this means do not include anything else, for example WIFI and IFE. It cant start listing things not to include as it would be unmanageable, so it has listed the things to only include in the table. If you would like to bring it up please feel free but to me thats very clear. --JetBlast (talk) 03:09, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Obviously, it's not very clear, because a lot of other pages have this information in the table...or maybe people aren't looking at the policy page. Again, this should be brought up on the talk page.  &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 03:16, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * It is the later, i have come across a few people who had no idea it existed. --JetBlast (talk) 03:18, 23 October 2011 (UTC)


 * You know what, I'll just get rid of the stuff related to wifi and keep the "3 entering service in 2012" or "2 leaving service in 2012." I can see why you removed the wifi stuff, but not the "3 entering service in 2012" stuff. &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 03:24, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Image requests
Hi! Let's review this: "Remove image requests--do we really need images for every single office in other countries?" WhisperToMe (talk) 19:22, 9 November 2011 (UTC)
 * http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Iran_Air&diff=459838468&oldid=459777237
 * Yes.
 * But maybe one or two office pics for every article, not every office in every single country for every single company. Just ones that can be clearly signified - That means one or two office pics per airline
 * The trick with image requests is to put them in as many appropriate places as possible. And just because I have a "requested image" doesn't necessarily mean that it will be used in the final article per se, but it will go in the commons.
 * You can't just ask on the commons. You have to ask on EN too. If there is a local language (DE, ES, FR, AR, JA, etc) you ask on that one too
 * For Iran Air I am asking for multiple office pics, since we can:
 * A. pick and choose which one is the best
 * B. Use them on Japanese, German, Italian, etc. Wikipedias
 * Even if the intention is to use the pics on non-English Wikipedias, you should still ask on EN because English is widely spoken around the world

Ba-humbug! It's sure easy to hit the save button without considering all the reasons why those image requests might be there. Anyway, I've reverted my edit and I'll make a note on the page as a reminder to myself and others not to delete these requests. &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 00:56, 10 November 2011 (UTC)


 * Looking at commons:Category:Iran Air, there is indeed a photo of the airline's Japanese office, see File:Akasaka Habitation Building -01.jpg. (I know that the image request says "Do a closeup version with the facility open!" and that the particular image isn't a closeup, but an image of the whole building may be more recognizable to readers.)  There's also an image of the Schiphol (Netherlands) World Trade Center, where Iran Air has an office.  Both of the aforementioned images are in the articles of their respective languages.  But as of yet, there's no image for any of the other offices requested on the talk page.  &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 01:36, 10 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Alrighty :) - Thanks!
 * As a note, the current Japanese image portrays the garage door closed, meaning you can't see the inside of the Iran Air office. What I want is an image where you can see the inside, during normal business hours, like File:66-68 Piccadilly.jpg
 * WhisperToMe (talk) 04:07, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Nepal Airlines
Thanks for clearing up the ambiguity here. I wouldn't know a 757-200M from any other. Sadly this article seems to suffer from rather high levels of vandalism and tendentious editing, so thanks for helping to get it back on track :) Pol430  talk to me 19:07, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
 * You're welcome! Anyway, they are the only ones to operate the 757-200M.  They just operate one -200M aircraft, and I believe their other 757 is just a regular 757.  I'll try and keep an eye on this article and stop any vandalism before it totally messes up the article.  &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 19:13, 26 December 2011 (UTC)

Transaero
You removed quite a few of my edits. I can agree with removing the edit about flying scrap. But you also removed properly substantiated notes from the... NOTES section. Is there a reason for that? Nomad (talk) 11:54, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * They just appeared to put a negative bias on Transaero. Your mention of Transaero operating the oldest fleet among Russian airlines wasn't sourced.  I don't know about whether it operates one of the oldest fleets in the world because Iran Air operates MUCH older aircraft (their avg. fleet age is 22.8 years!) and so does Saha Air (they're the last commercial operator of the 707).  Transaero's avg. fleet age, by comparison is 16.2 years, according to Airfleets.net.  That's not much older than the three large US airlines, Delta (15.5 years), American (15.1 years), and post-merger United (14 years).  Ok, Transaero may operate some old aircraft but they're not much older than these “Big Three” US airlines.  And your sentence that says “Experts believe that expanding a fleet in such a way is economically inviable for this type of airline” was not sourced so that got the axe too.  Same with the thing you posted in the cabin section.  If you have a source, go ahead and re-add the information.  I won't remove it if it has a reliable source.   &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 18:36, 30 December 2011 (UTC)
 * Well, you are doing what Transaero do - you're comparing them to huge airlines. Delta has over 1600 airplanes and their average age is suffering from their fleet of immortal MD80's. And that's not a fair comparison - we all know that the pilots delivering the last A380 to the scrap yard will fly home on an MD-80. Transaero, on the other hand, has very few planes and ALL of them are old.
 * As for cabins differences, my only proof would be links to Airliners.net photographs that clearly show the difference in both colors and amenities. Would that be enough in your opinion? Nomad (talk) 12:16, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
 * You think I'm "doing what Transaero does" in comparing them to huge airlines? Well maybe, but they aren't the only airline that purchases second-hand aircraft.  And you have to keep a neutral point of view on Wikipedia and not add whole bunch of negatively biased info, but at the same time you don't want to make it appear to be written by the airline's marketing department.  Aside from that, the biggest reason why I removed the info is that it did not have a reliable source.  And about the cabin info, I'm not sure if a photo is really a reliable source.  And also info about cabin amenities on each and every aircraft is not necessary and makes an article look like a travel guide, and you do not want WP articles to look like that.  &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 02:06, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Also see WP:UNDUE, that is probably the best explanation of why I removed the info. &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 02:29, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In Emirates (airline), you recently added a link to the disambiguation page Perth (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:41, 18 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Fixed. &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 17:33, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited SkyWest Airlines destinations, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Burbank and Santa Barbara (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:13, 25 December 2011 (UTC)


 * Fixed. &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 17:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification
Hi. When you recently edited Air Jamaica, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Nassau (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:38, 16 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Fixed &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 17:24, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Airline Collapsable List - Hubs
Clearly we are not agreeing on this as we keep reverting each others edits. Your discussion hasn't gone anywhere so I think just me and you need to talk. Collapsable list if necessary (which it is) for Delta and United with there 10 hubs it is certainly necessary for Southwest's 12. But in general we need to fix what we are not agreeing on as we are getting NOWHERE. Will hear back from you soon. Cali4529 (talk) 05:28, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I agree US doesn't need it and AA if they get anymore hubs or focus cities will but not yet... so I guess we have to agree on what airlines need it (talking American carriers). I am thinking B6, WN, DL, UA and the rest are fine right now without it. But we need to figure this out because its just us not agreeing because no one else cares... lol. Cali4529 (talk) 05:31, 19 January 2012 (UTC)

My view on whether or not it needs collapsible is this: Does it get so long that it protrudes into the history section when I expand all the collapsible lists? If yes, I keep the lists the way they are. If no, which is almost always the case, then I get rid of the collapsible lists. Clearly, in my opinion, it has to do with how it looks visually, not just a certain number of hubs/ focus cities. In the case of Southwest Airlines, well, the lead just needs to be longer and then it will be all right. The lead is much shorter than it's supposed to be and if we expand the lead, that will make it so that the infobox will be just fine without the stupid collapsible lists. With United, I'm not going to even bother changing it because the collapsible lists are indeed necessary but with Southwest and its soon-to-be-expanded (by me) lead, said collapsible lists will no longer be necessary. I also think that Pan Am's infobox could greatly use a collapsible list, or have some of the info moved out of the infobox and into other sections. Some of those items we have in infoboxes could use some trimming, like key people, we should only have founder, CEO, President, and Chairman, and not other info.

BTW, have you noticed that in the JetBlue Airways infobox, the president is listed twice? That oughta be fixed... &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 06:03, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Agree with everything you are saying, I just looked at Southwest without collapsable lists and it is quite long so I really think SWA needs it. I agree CEO, President, Chairman and Founder. All other people are not needed. Cali4529 (talk) 13:11, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, maybe Southwest does need the collapsible lists. It's kind of in-between.  The lead could be expanded too, while we're at it.  &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 17:54, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, I'm glad we were able to talk this out. And i agree 150% that the lead needs to be expanded. Cali4529 (talk) 19:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Personally i think that SWA doesnt need one. But other airlines such as Ryanair do, Infact if you look in the edit history you will find i created it. --JetBlast (talk) 02:20, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
JetBlast (talk) 02:16, 20 January 2012 (UTC)

Make your case at United Airlines
United Airlines. 72.244.206.178 (talk) 06:07, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

(Note: I understand why you'd want me to post this on the article's talk page, but since it's just the two of us in disagreement, let's just sort it out between the two of us first, but if we can't come to an agreement then I'll post this on the article's talk page and get a "third opinion.")

I would like to know why you like that other close-up picture better, but first I am going to tell you the reasons why I think the DC-10 picture is better. United was the launch customer (along with AA) for the DC-10. Considering that, it's a better use of space to have an image like that then to have an image of a livery that I believe was only used for a few years before United hired Saul Bass to design a new livery (which was the Rainbow Scheme that was used for nearly 20 years) and logo (the tulip). The DC-10 image probably should mention the fact that United was a launch customer for the aircraft, though. And I don't even think that the DC-10 in the picture was even painted in the stars and bars livery. And also, since the history section in this article is really just a summary with a link to the main article, that means that the pictures here really should be ones of much importance. Why do you think having a close-up picture of a livery that was used for just a few years is more important and notable than having a picture of an aircraft used for 20+ years? Please explain to me below. Finally, you ought to know that I did not take that picture nor did I upload it to WP nor add it to this article. Hope we can come to an understanding soon. &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 00:47, 28 January 2012 (UTC)
 * I replied here. 72.244.204.211 (talk) 07:17, 30 January 2012 (UTC)

Boeing 737 Classic
I've reinstated the two accidents you deleted as "non-notable". Both accdents have articles. If you believe that either accident/incident is not notable, you are welcome to nominate them for deletion at WP:AFD. Should the articles be deleted, then removal from the list may be an option, but they may still be worth mentioning per WP:AIRCRASH. Mjroots (talk) 07:02, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Well, it needs to be made more obvious what happened to those planes. With the Adam air crash, it should say that the aircraft split into two upon landing (see the pic in the article), but as for the Turkish Airlines 734 hijacking, I don't know about that one.  Either way, the notability for both accidents needs to be made more clear.  &mdash;Compdude123 (talk) 22:20, 28 January 2012 (UTC)


 * As the Adam Air pic is hosted at Commons, I've added it to the 737 Classic article. AFAIK, Hijackings are mentionable, and generally notable enough to sustain articles. Mjroots (talk) 05:34, 29 January 2012 (UTC)

Airport Table Voting
Voting for the Airport Linking Format has begun please visit Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Airports under the Airline/Airport Table Voting column. Thanks! Cali4529 (talk) 02:26, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Incidents and accidents Boeing 777-300ER SQ flight 327
Well in fact, I don't care about the numbers of injuries, fatalities, i had seen recently, many people just adding for example, Qantas A380. while landing in Changi, the A380 landed safely without injuries, fatalities. With all my respect, I MUST include this topic because it is very important. so Please and Please, I beg of you NOT to remove this topic away. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ramy A330 (talk • contribs) 19:21, 24 February 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry but the guidelines I mentioned on your talk page are ones that are widely accepted by the Aviation WikiProject. Many other users besides me agree with these guidelines and will be quick to remove any incidents that do not conform to the guidelines.  In fact, as I was about to remove your edits, another user, beat me to it!  Since this has to do with a particular article, please explain on Talk:Boeing 777 why you think this incident is so important.  Thanks, Comp dude 123 22:00, 24 February 2012 (UTC)

Reverts
Hi! I like your signature by the way. He had been adding wrong info all around wikipedia as well as changing the colors for no reason. I try to get people blocked before the 3RR comes up. Kairportflier (talk) 04:18, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Ok, now I see why you reverted his edits, given that he was changing other stuff like this and that he is now blocked. I was just wondering as it seemed like you were reverting for no reason.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 04:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)
 * He's blocked for a day and by the time he logs on again he probably won't be blocked. He was adding wrong information on wikipedia, whether they were small or large edits it dosnt matter because they were wrong. I'm sorry if this offended you but I have no tolerance for vandalism and apparently administrators agree with me because they blocked them with my reasons. I didn't block the IP because I am not an administrator. Kairportflier (talk) 16:01, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Jetstreamer (talk) 21:42, 27 February 2012 (UTC)

User talk:76.167.26.214
Notice you welcomed this user. Please note their edit summary for Concorde which isn't exactly friendly. When welcoming new users please make sure to look at what they are doing and provide relevant advice. Saying such an edit was especially helpful was probably not the smartest idea.  N419 BH  05:10, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I know, but the annoying thing about using twinkle to add those welcome templates is that there's no way to preview the message before it get saved. I will notify them of this.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 05:13, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * I killed those welcome templates and took the time to actually type out a personal message to the user. &mdash;Comp dude 123 05:22, 5 March 2012 (UTC)
 * Sounds good, just wanted to make sure you knew. Thanks!  N419 BH  05:30, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Wings Abadi Air
Hi the IP edit you recently reverted at Wings Abadi Air appears to have been in good faith, I noticed Changi (SIN) looked out of place (listed under Malaysia) and checked out the others per Lion AIr (JT) online booking which lists Wings (IW) flights as well. The others the IP deleted were also erroneous. I looked over some other edits including one to Kal Star Aviation and that checked out OK. The same editor has made several changes to Indonesian airline fleet numbers that I did not have time to check out. So I have undone your revert to Wings Abadi after some thourough checking. It seems that IP is editing in good faith. It would have helped a lot if they had left an edit note. -- cheers Felix (talk) 17:41, 6 March 2012 (UTC)
 * It would sure be nice if people used the edit summaries! It's there for a reason...  &mdash;Comp dude 123 02:25, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

editor Zaps93
This guy along with another called Jaspel has been accused of sockpuppetry in the past and was probably banned, this guy or guys with two or three more active editors who I wont name here had formed a kind of gang that constantly hounded airline articles reverting edits and seeking help from each other when confronted, he also used another username JoeyBoeing777 which he kept denying but eventually accepted with a false story that this joey was a guest at his home and used his computer to edit, anyways keep an eye on him, the worst of the lot Jaspel, a true bitch if you excuse my language, has yet to come back, if he wasnt this guys sockpuppet. 118.103.228.65 (talk) 15:54, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Have you tried talking to them about the edits that they reverted on their talk page, or on a specific article talk page? That's the first thing you should do in order to solve disputes with other editors.  And don't be so quick to assume sockpuppetry.  Have Zaps93/ Jasepl been blocked on accusations of sockpuppetry?  Can you please link to a sockpuppet investigation involving  or ?  &mdash;Comp dude 123 23:14, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Just an Update
Hi! I see you have also had problems with [IP Address:99.32.18.48] so I thought I would update you. This user, after his 24 hour block continued to vandalize Frontier Airlines & Southwest Airlines so he has now been blocked for 1 month. Thanks for pitching all of you great ideas at wiki airlines, I look forward to the updated destinations articles. Kairportflier (talk) 00:34, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Also.... You have been doing a GREAT job at Alaska Airlines and when you are done with your vigorous uplifting of that article I think the next priority should be Southwest Airlines. It seems un organized and needs a lot of help. Thanks! Kairportflier (talk) 00:39, 1 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I think SWA will probably be next on my to-do list. I appreciate your help with Alaska Airlines.  Thanks, Comp dude 123 00:42, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

You are a terrible editor
You marked my link as spam on the United Airlines page, and you corrected my information that I corrected as I know a lot more about United. Wikipedia should remove your account for false accusations.

If my link is spam, I promise to remove it from wikipedia. Heres the other thing, I have explicit permission from United for the site. I am a teen, and I don't have to money for a domain.

https://sites.google.com/site/unitedfleetsite/ is the link to the site. I PROMISE IT IS NOT (NOT)(NOT)(NOT) EMPHASIS ON THE NOT SPAM! IF IT IS HAVE WIKIPEDIA REMOVE MY ACCOUNT.

Check out the FlyerTalk thread "United Airlines Fleet Updates" or the twitter page "@unitedfleetwebs" as proof that hundreds of people use the site, and it is not spam UA767400

UA767400 (talk) 23:48, 28 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Please speak kindly to others. I really hope you don't speak to people like that in real life.  Calm down and don't take your anger out on me, or others.  If you do that, then you will notice that people will actually listen to you.  Thanks, Comp dude 123 02:24, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * I don't see how you can possibly think your edits are not to promote this website. Your edits involved adding three links to the same website as well as a paragraph about how great this website is.  If you really think that I have wrongly accused you of promoting your personal website, then good luck at trying to get an admin to block me.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 02:41, 29 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Clearly promotional in nature, and furthermore a personal attack here to boot. He re-added the info too. I've reverted and left warnings for both the addition of spam links and this personal attack.  N419 BH  02:59, 29 May 2012 (UTC)

Narita International Airport
When you get a chance, can please keep an eye on this page? Someone has been replacing the terminals with the airline alliances in the terminal column and have been continuously adding bogus/imaginary flights that do not serve Narita (these airlines may operate codeshare flights to Narita). Thanks! Snoozlepet (talk) 19:28, 8 June 2012 (UTC)
 * It looks like the page has been semi-protected. Anyway that IP address, 180.149, (as well as 58.97) has been making bad edits to airport pages for quite a while.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 22:43, 8 June 2012 (UTC)

Your Delta Fleet page edits
Dude - Please don't remove the the useful data that is being complied in far right hand column on the Delta Fleet page. This information has been accurate and many of us enjoy watching the progress of the Delta fleet modications. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.42.214.30 (talk) 22:34, 9 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I only removed information regarding seating upgrades in the notes column. Another IP user removed more info which I think should have been kept there.  Info about aircraft getting winglets, being replaced by other aircraft, or in storage is okay to have in the fleet table, but info regarding seating upgrades isn't necessary.  Please ask that IP user  why he removed that information.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 00:59, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry about accusing you of removing all the useful information from the notes column. I didn't look carefully before posting. I apologize. I respectfully disagree with most of your edits about seating configuration. The progress of the lie flat Business Elite seats in the international wide bodies as well as the major cabin modifications to the MD-88 (underway) and MD-90 (completed) sub-fleets is significant as the rear galley is removed and the forward galley is enlarged and entirely replaced. I agree with you that the Economy Comfort product which is a minor adjustment does not belong in the fleet table. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.42.214.51 (talk) 17:23, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
 * Okay, I will let the info about MD-80/MD-90 cabin modifications stay, as a compromise. No need for me to dispute such minor details like that.  Also please sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~ ) so that other users know who said what.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 20:36, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

LHR and FRA - United hubs?
How can LHR and FRA be hubs when they only fly to other United hubs? 68.113.122.83 (talk) 00:42, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * The only reason I added them was because there was an edit request on Talk:United Airlines. The user who requested the edit provided a link to a page on United's website listing their hubs, and LHR and FRA were both listed there.  Anyway, it would be best to discuss this on Talk:United Airlines.  (post new messages at the bottom of the page, not the top)  &mdash;Comp dude 123 00:51, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
 * But the link says "United hubs and key airports". 68.113.122.83 (talk) 00:53, 20 June 2012 (UTC)

FAC for Boeing 757
Hi Compdude123, as someone who contributed to the A-Class review of Boeing 757, you might be interested in commenting at its Featured Article candidacy, which is now open at: Featured article candidates/Boeing 757/archive1. Any input is welcome. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 22:07, 20 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Greetings again, just in case my message was obscured by the bot which edited afterwards, if you have any comments on the FA candidacy of Boeing 757, it is currently open at the above link. Sincerely, SynergyStar (talk) 00:31, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
 * No I saw your message, but just haven't had time to comment on the FAC review. But I will try and do this soon.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 04:35, 28 June 2012 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the reply, and for confirming that the initial message was read. Regards, SynergyStar (talk) 06:28, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

why are there three talk headers?
I try to add {TOC} to Talk:El Al, but nothing success.--B767-500 (talk) 05:00, 3 July 2012 (UTC)
 * A Table of contents is not added unless there are sufficient sections. To force a TOC to appear, you can type   anywhere on the page.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 18:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

MDW - Please Help
Hey, hope you are doing well! I know you are a great editor and know what you are doing. I am at my 3 edits, it is officially an edit war at Chicago Midway International Airport. Could you visit the Talk:Chicago Midway International Airport and put your input in. Thanks! Kairportflier (talk) 23:53, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism in Shahjalal International Airport
Hi Compdude, Thanks for tackling the vandalism conducted by by IP user 180.149.31.62, and semi-protecting the article. Hope the user is given a limitation to edit on Wikipedia. This airport (Shahjalal International Airport) and and another airport article of Bangladesh, Shah Amanat International Airport is very prone to vandalism, notably, filling the page with made up destinations. I would also like to ask you to semi-protect Shah Amanat Airport. Thanks for you cooperation Happy Editing!

User:Ahnaaf (talk) 13:17, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


 * Darn it, that's not what I wanted to happen. I wanted to get the IP user blocked, rather than having the page semi-protected.  Perhaps if I had someone else on my side, then maybe they would listen to me.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 18:07, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

Gulf Aviation refs and cites.
thanks for the edits. Still learning how to do this to the best standards! Wondered about the refs to other Wikipedia articles as, being a professional engineer amongst other things, I do not feel comfortable with 'circular' refs and you have confirmed that this would be viewed as such. Cheers, Simon Woodhead (talk) 18:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. Yes, you're not allowed to use another Wikipedia article as a source.  And also, put the period before the ref, not after.  Finally, if you want to have inline citations to the same reference more than once, you can do so by naming the particular ref.  The first time you cite a particular source, instead of just typing   you type  .  For additional citations to that same reference, you can format them like this:  .  This is much quicker than having to type out the ref each and every time, and it avoids having multiple refs that are exactly the same in the References section.  I did this for you in the Gulf Aviation article, but I just wanted to explain what I was doing.  If you have any other questions about refs or anything else on Wikipedia, don't hesitate to ask me.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 20:36, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks again. The word period doesn't work in English English but now I know that you mean (in English English) full stop. Actually don't agree but we've both got bigger fish to fry to get this article to a good standard. Rgds, Simon Simon Woodhead (talk) 21:07, 14 July 2012 (UTC)
 * According to MOS:REFPUNC, inline references should go after punctuation marks like commas and periods. It's general practice for Wikipedia, and it looks better to have the ref after a punctuation mark rather than before.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 23:15, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing me at the relevant Wiki document. Have dipped into MOS a fair few times but still a long way from knowing most of the wrinkles. Rgds, Simon Woodhead (talk) 07:23, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

Date edits on Boeing 377
Thanks for your comment. I've responded to this and to other's comments on the article's talk page. Feel free to take a look. Thanks. Truthanado (talk) 00:23, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

United Airlines Cabin
Hey I noticed you were one of the main contributors in the United Airlines article so I thought you would be the best to ask. Why isn't there anything besides one paragraph about the cabin in the article? I think everything about the DirecTv on the old Continental planes and info on the seats and everything should be in the article. I'm probly somehow missing it and it could be hidden in another article but I think it should be included in the article.--Astros4477 (talk) 04:56, 1 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I think you'd be best off discussing this on the United Airlines talk page so you could get some feedback from other users. My guess was that much of the information was removed because Wikipedia is not a travel guide and should not have lengthy descriptions about each and every cabin amenity.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 05:46, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Singapore Airlines
Hi, I have marked an edit of your on Singapore Airlines as vandalism, i pressed the wrong button. sorry :) --JetBlast (talk) 17:16, 6 August 2012 (UTC)
 * That's okay, I forgive you! &mdash;Comp dude 123 19:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
JetBlast (talk) 08:27, 11 August 2012 (UTC)

Focus Cities on pages
Hi! Could you come on over to the "Focus Cities on pages" section of wiki airports and add your opinion, Thanks! Kairportflier (talk) 17:28, 12 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you
Thank you for letting me know and informing me to do so! Jetstreamer has been really bugging me when it comes to the Ethiopian Airlines page. Everytime I did something wrong, he told me I needed a reliable source. And the one time I added one, he decides to remove it as if he didn't care. If you know him well, can you please tell him that I'm becoming real sick of him and that he needs to layoff whenever I try to edit something? Would appreciate it.

Also, when you say sign posts, does that also mean sign posts when you edit a page? --Triple A (talk) 01:30, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * About your first point, you and Jetstreamer seem to have pretty rough relations with each other. My take on the dispute you've been having between the two of you is that you are "jumping the gun," adding info that the 787 was delivered to Ethiopian before it actually had.  Well now it's delivered.  I found this Flightglobal article just published earlier today and (guess what?) a Boeing press release!  Go show those to Jetstreamer, because a Boeing press release is what he was waiting for.
 * Also, don't use a signature when you edit an actual article; only sign when you edit a talk page. See WP:Signatures.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 04:20, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Alaska Airlines source
A NewsBank search of the Anchorage Daily News (adnsearch.com) comes up with the following: "Inside Alaska Business" of September 4, 1998 is inconclusive because of the paywall, but may mention AS's announcement of the discontinuation of service. "Inside Alaska Business" of September 16 mentions that Reeve would continue weekly flights to Russia. Specific quote: "Last week Alaska Airlines said it would stop its Russia service as of Oct. 8".

In WikiProject Alaska, User: John Carter states that he has access to other publications (particularly Alaska Business Monthly and the Alaska Journal of Commerce) which may have published mention of it.RadioKAOS (talk) 09:03, 15 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your help! I always appreciate it.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 16:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Talkback
Jetstreamer Talk 13:05, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Alaska Airlines
Please send me an e-mail with an indication of your e-mail address, so I can have an e-mail address to forward the relevant articles to. Also, are you only interested in that one fact, or are you working to develop for instance the Alaska Airlines article in general, or some other article? If so, a somewhat clearer indication of the scope of the content you are seeking would be useful. John Carter (talk) 23:24, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Replied in the email I sent you. &mdash;Comp dude 123 00:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the clarification. I acknowledge some of the sources I mentioned above are available on a subscription website the local library subscribes to, but I unfortunately am a long way away from that library today. I do have the Highbeam Research database available to me, and I found a few sources there which might be useful and e-mailed them to you. I think. I am rather far away from internet towers today, so I made several requests to send them directly, which may not have worked. So I sent them to myself and forwarded those to you as well. Anyway, I think they should be useful. John Carter (talk) 21:23, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, I got those three emails you sent me. Thanks a lot!  &mdash;Comp dude 123 21:46, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Southwest Airlines talk
I responded on Talk:Southwest Airlines. Kairportflier (talk) 01:50, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

adding destinations in prose with tentative date
You along with some other editors had said this is ok to do, notably in JAL when adding San Diego and Helsinki info, so why is Jetstreamer going against this policy? I added Kuala Lumpur in this style at Ethiopian Airlines destinations as planned for November 2012 with valid reference stating month and year, and it was removed. inspector (talk) 20:29, 26 August 2012 (UTC)
 * I suggest discussing the removal with Jetstreamer. I thought we had consensus regarding this but Jetstreamer is going against it.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 00:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

User WPAVIATION Defunct Airlines task force
Hi Compdude123. I have moved the WikiProject Aviation/Outreach/User WPAVIATION Defunct Airlines task force for you, though I have moved it to WikiProject Aviation/Outreach/User WPAVIATION Defunct Airlines task force rather than WikiProject Aviation/Outreach/User WPAVIATION Defunct Airlines task force, which would have landed it in article space rather than in project space. Is that what you intended? I've left a redirect, let me know if you want this deleted. Kind regards, Malcolmxl5 (talk) 00:57, 28 August 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes, that is what I intended. Didn't want it in the article space, whoops.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 00:47, 30 August 2012 (UTC)

Singapore Airlines fleet
Hello, hows things with you? Keeping well? I have read your comments here I am just wondering if you think the article should be put forward for deleting? Thanks --JetBlast (talk) 14:00, 21 September 2012 (UTC)
 * Nope I wasn't thinking to delete the whole article, just remove unnecessary info. I posted an additional comment on Talk:Singapore Airlines fleet.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 03:53, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Lion Air revert
Oops. My mistake - I meant to revert the uncited figures, then go back and refix "retied". I have now done so. Both Lion Air and Garuda Indonesia have been subject to a series of uncited changes in recent weeks, and I was obviously not concentrating when I tried to revert that one. Thanks for the heads-up. Davidelit (Talk) 23:35, 27 September 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alaska Airlines
The article Alaska Airlines you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needed to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass, otherwise it will fail. See Talk:Alaska Airlines for things which need to be addressed. Jetstreamer Talk 19:41, 29 September 2012 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Alaska Airlines
The article Alaska Airlines you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Alaska Airlines for comments about the article. Well done! Jetstreamer Talk 01:07, 30 September 2012 (UTC)

Lion Air 787 order
I saw you reverted my edit in Lion Air about the 787. If the 787s of Lion Air are not going to be operated by the planned long-haul subsidiary Batik Air then who will operate them? 72.89.35.142 (talk) 01:59, 1 October 2012 (UTC)
 * They are going to be operated by Batik Air, that's why I removed them. They won't be operated by Lion Air for Batik; if they were, it'd be fine to list them on the Lion Air page.  But no, that's not the case so don't put 787s on Lion Air's page.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 03:32, 1 October 2012 (UTC)

United 787-900 aircraft order and entry date
The table has United expecting the delivery of the Boeing 787-900 aircraft in 2014 but the source says that Air New Zealand will take delivery of that aircraft not United. Snoozlepet (talk) 23:27, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I didn't add this info, but I removed it. The source had nothing to do with United.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 04:09, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * thanks but I know you didn't add it. Is United still planning to take delivery of that aircraft? Snoozlepet (talk) 04:52, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Yes. &mdash;Comp dude 123 15:00, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank you! (B707)
Hi, and thanks for having an eye on my very first edit. I'd like to add that I was hesitating to address the airport as "Renton Mun" rather than as Renton Field, because that was the term used in my source (Boeing.com). My guess was that Renton Field was the official name at the time when the bird was built. But yes, I might have investigated instead of guessing :-).

I understand you are particulary interested in less known vintage airplanes. As a flight simmer, this historic field is also appealing to me. My personal mission will be to crossfeed wiki pages dealing with aviation. My fuel tanks for this kind of crossfeed are the Englisch, German, Dutch, French and Italian Wiki. So if you are looking for, say, a WW I Caproni bomber and find most sources are in italian and german, I'd be glad to help, for I understand and speak these languages. Feel free to contact me as you see fit.

Thanks again,

Johannes "The Rhythmosaur" König

The rhythmosaur (talk) 14:10, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
 * It's great to have people with knowledge of other languages contributing to the English wikipedia, because you could be able to find/ verify sources in other languages. Also, I suggest you use your knowledge of these other languages to translate English articles to other languages and vice versa.  (I see you plan on doing that)  Hope you enjoy Wikipedia, and thanks for your contributions!  &mdash;Comp dude 123 20:34, 12 October 2012 (UTC)


 * One thing at a time. I have to become familiar with everything before I start writing articles from scratch, so I start by editing, that is trying to enhance existing articles. and there is much to do: You got a very high standard here. But if you check out the Boeing 707 article, for example, in other languages, you might be surprised. While here a citation was demanded just for the seating capacity, you don't find a single footnote in the italian article, (well, not yet :-) ) not even the citation needed tag while the article has some excellent passages otherwise. And the talk page is all blank.
 * If you have something special in mind right now however, I would prefer to do this together with you rather than jumping in the cold water right now. Like Rod Machado said, before you learn to walk you need to know how to crawl, and before you learn to fly you should master walking to perfection...


 * The rhythmosaur (talk) 03:06, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * I'm not really one to start new articles; I work on ones that already exist. I edit airline articles most often, but I wouldn't mind helping you with a certain aircraft article.  If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me.  &mdash;Comp dude 123 03:30, 13 October 2012 (UTC)
 * Roger, wilco! Right now I am papering my headquartes, trying to move all the furniture in, and then connect the wiki branches. My HQ will be here and not on the German Wiki because all others understand english. And the friendliness here is only competited by the Dutch Wiki :-)


 * The rhythmosaur (talk) 19:02, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

November 2012
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, please do not remove citations or information sourced through citations simply because a link to a source is not working, as you did to United Airlines. Dead links should not be deleted. Instead, please repair or replace the link, if possible, and ensure properly sourced information is retained. Often, a live substitute link can be found. Links not used as references, notes or citations are not as important, such as those listed in the "External links" or "Further reading" sections, but bad links in those sections should also be fixed if possible. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. JetBlast (talk) 08:39, 23 November 2012 (UTC)


 * I know it's a little generic but you get what i mean :-) --JetBlast (talk) 08:42, 23 November 2012 (UTC)
 * Sorry, didn't know that! Thanks, Comp dude 123 19:05, 23 November 2012 (UTC)

Hand-coding
Hey all :).

I'm dropping you a note because you've been involved in dealing with feedback from the Article Feedback Tool. To get a better handle on the overall quality of comments now that the tool has become a more established part of the reader experience, we're undertaking a round of hand coding - basically, taking a sample of feedback and marking each piece as inappropriate, helpful, so on - and would like anyone interested in improving the tool to participate :).

You can code as many or as few pieces of feedback as you want: this page should explain how to use the system, and there is a demo here. Once you're comfortable with the task, just drop me an email at and I'll set you up with an account :).

If you'd like to chat with us about the research, or want live tutoring on the software, there will be an office hours session on Monday 17 December at 23:00 UTC in. Hope to see some of you there! Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 23:30, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year


Jetstreamer Talk is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the Christmas cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas3}} to their talk page with a friendly message. --Jetstreamer Talk 23:11, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merry Christmas to you, too, and a happy new year! &mdash;Comp dude 123 05:04, 21 December 2012 (UTC)

Season's tidings!
To you and yours, Have a Merry ______ (fill in the blank) and Happy New Year! FWiW Bzuk (talk) 02:11, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Merry Christmas to you too, and a happy New Year!!! Thanks, Comp dude 123 21:05, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

Happy Holidays!


Snoozlepet (talk) is wishing you a Merry Christmas! This greeting (and season) promotes WikiLove and hopefully this note has made your day a little better. Spread the WikiLove by wishing another user a Merry Christmas, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past, a good friend, or just some random person. Happy New Year!

Spread the cheer by adding {{subst:Xmas2}} to their talk page with a friendly message. Hope you have a wonderful Christmas and a prosperous New Years! Hope to keep in touch soon here on Wiki!! Snoozlepet (talk) 17:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Thanks, all of you! Merry Christmas, Snoozlepet, and a happy new year!  Again thanks, Comp dude 123 21:08, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

WP Airlines in the Signpost
The WikiProject Report would like to focus on WikiProject Airlines for a Signpost article. This is an excellent opportunity to draw attention to your efforts and attract new members to the project. Would you be willing to participate in an interview? If so, here are the questions for the interview. Just add your response below each question and feel free to skip any questions that you don't feel comfortable answering. Multiple editors will have an opportunity to respond to the interview questions, so be sure to sign your answers. If you know anyone else who would like to participate in the interview, please share this with them. Have a great day. –Mabeenot (talk) 19:12, 22 January 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 9
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.


 * T-class ferry (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added links pointing to Powell River and Sointula


 * MV Tenaka (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
 * added a link pointing to Powell River

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:14, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MV Quinitsa, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Horseshoe Bay (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:34, 11 June 2013 (UTC)

Shahjalal International Airport
Hi Compdude! We meet again! The article Shahjalal International Airport, is again facing vandalism. IP 58.97.188.227 is falsely adding random destinations of the airline to the page. The article was semi-protected for a year. However on 11 July, the protection expired, and vandalism has again started. Please help me protect the page. Cheers! -- Ahnaaf (talk) 12:00, 22 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for alerting me about this. An admin (User:CambridgeBayWeather) semi-protected the page, after I posted a message on the WikiProject Airports talk page about it. If this ever happens again on this article or others, you can notify that admin on his talkpage or post a message on the talkpage for the Airports Wikiproject. &mdash;Comp dude 123 01:06, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Thank you for helping me! Cheers. -- Ahnaaf (talk) 06:20, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * You're welcome. &mdash;Comp dude 123 06:21, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * When notifying something related to the above, or even anything else, there's no need to worry on whether someone is missing what you wrote. Just use the template when referring to someone. This template notifies the editor included in the template that you're mentioning their name. For instance, if I write, you'll get notified about this reply. Cheers.--Jetstreamer $Talk$ 18:56, 23 July 2013 (UTC)
 * I know about that. I used that User template when I posted the message on WT:AIRPORTS. &mdash;Comp dude 123 20:47, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 5
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MV Hiyu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ADA (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 3
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited MV Crosline, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Point Defiance (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 3 May 2014 (UTC)