User talk:Compo

Please enter comments to Compo below:

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Virtual Ethnography, but we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. Perhaps you would like to rewrite the article in your own words. For more information about Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, take a look at our Five Pillars. Happy editing! --Alan Au 05:52, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Semi-automated template substitution

 * This page was modified to semi-automatically substitute templates using Pathoschild's template list. // Rory 0 96 02:28, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

User:Stevenson-Perez
I notice you have also encountered the edits of User:Stevenson-Perez. I've posted some comments on the user's Talk page. - David Oberst 18:09, 14 March 2007 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Scientific Community of Practice
An editor has nominated Scientific Community of Practice, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not"). Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. Jayden54Bot 19:59, 15 March 2007 (UTC)

Liberal borrowing of your words
Howdy, I've taken stuff about scientific communities of practice that seemed to be the subject of controversy and adapted them to CPsquare's CoP bibliography here: http://cpsquare.org/wiki/Scientific_communities. Hope that's OK. Would love to have any more references you might have.

Smithjd8 20:52, 31 December 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Smithjd8 (talk • contribs)

Speedy deletion nomination of License Program Product


Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on License Program Product requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Codename Lisa (talk) 12:06, 25 July 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

January 2021
Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 12:09, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of License Program Product


The article License Program Product has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This is a specific instance of Software as a Product with no information to distinguish it from others. If needed this information could be folded into that article"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Peter Flass (talk) 17:00, 5 January 2024 (UTC)