User talk:Comradeash

Please sign all comments on talk pages using four tildes (like this ~, or use the signature button on the editing toolbar above the editbox). Thanks. Harro5 08:39, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

oops Comradeash 08:40, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Also, please cite sources...how can you verify the section of St. Michaels about drama students being druggies, other than original research? A newspaper article of some kind?--jfg284 08:56, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Your new approach
Good to see you and Beyondcapricorn contributing positively (case ini point some changes to Wesley and Xavier). Hopefully this continues and you both become valued contributors to school and other articles on Wikipedia. Harro5 19:56, 14 November 2005 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Drawball may26.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Drawball may26.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page to provide the necessary information on the source or licensing of this image (if you have any), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Do not upload new drawball images
See Talk:Drawball. Wikipedia does not need new fair use images every few days to document the ever changing drawball. In the same manner that we don't get new pictures every day for newspaper front pages, we don't need it for something even more inconsequential. This is against Wikipedia's Fair Use policy, we now have around 10 orphaned fair use images that are lining up to be deleted. We only need one or two images to show what the drawball is, and we already have those. - Hahnch e  n 15:11, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * and might I ask under whos authority do you speak?
 * In general interests of following Fair Use guidelines. Wikipedia uses as few fair use images as possible.  Like a newspaper front page, the drawball is updated every day.  We use an image to show what the Drawball is, not its current state.  We're an encyclopedia, we're meant to provide timeless information.  Look at biographies for example, we do not upload new images of every haircut David Beckham gets.  The Drawball is like this, but even more inconsequential. - Hahnch  e  n 17:14, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Your little tirade against drawball sounds like a personal issue, considering it is far more amusing than david bloody beckham. Join us in turning south korean flags into japanese ones!
 * I've nothing against the drawball itself per se. It's the constant bickering that goes on in Wikipedia because of it.  Like the List of YTMND fads that was deleted.  Almost everything listed for the Drawball were unencyclopedic and unsourced.  I actually came across the Drawball article whilst deleting links to the YTMND article.  It's been so hard to get any editing done on the article, because as soon as you've got rid of some crap, it gets added back in by LUE/GenMay/OT (delete as applicable) that it's now been protected from anons. - Hahnch  e  n 17:22, 28 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Oh, you'll never hear the end of it if you piss off a forum.

Survey Invitation
Hi there, I am a research student from the National University of Singapore and I wish to invite you to do an online survey about Wikipedia. To compensate you for your time, I am offering a reward of USD$10, either to you or as a donation to the Wikimedia Foundation. For more information, please go to the research home page. Thank you. --WikiInquirer 05:03, 16 March 2007 (UTC)talk to me

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
 * If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Myotherapy with a link to where we can find that note;
 * If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Myotherapy with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Myotherapy saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Butseriouslyfolks 07:09, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

Talk:Jasmuheen
Please do not use talk pages for general discussion of the topic. They are for discussion related to improving the article. They are not to be used as a forum or chat room. See here for more information. - Mdbrownmsw (talk) 17:54, 7 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: Your comment on the Controversies over the word "niggardly" talk page
I've reported the incident here. Noroton (talk) 04:23, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Such comments have no place in civilized discourse, including Wikipedia. At the next such comment your editing privileges will be temporarily or indefinitely suspended. Raymond Arritt (talk) 04:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)


 * Agreed. Please don't make any further offensive racial comments on Wikipedia. Article talk pages are for discussing the article; this and this do not fall into that category. Picaroon (t) 04:25, 24 December 2007 (UTC)

You're sick.
You're sick, why would you even say that? Pluvia (talk) 02:17, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

So because you said: "Let us know how it turns out, maybe even post a picture." Comradeash 15:03, 21 September 2007 (UTC)

It makes me a clueless fuck? That was possibly the worst explination I've ever heard for any reason ever. Pluvia (talk) 03:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Stop Editing R171 Mercedes article.
Comradeash, please stop removing information from the R171 article. your OPINIONS /'contributions' are not welcome there. Please see discussion page for that article.

Speedy deletion of Arguendo
A tag has been placed on Arguendo requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rnb (talk) 17:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of Black GST
I have nominated Black GST, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Black GST. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. &mdash;Moondyne click! 10:41, 15 April 2008 (UTC)

Nomination of In mitius for deletion
The article In mitius is being discussed concerning whether it is suitable for inclusion as an article according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/In mitius until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Nat682 (talk) 01:45, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:03, 23 November 2015 (UTC)