User talk:Concernedcavalier

Proposed deletion of The Role of Interest Groups in International Relations
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article The Role of Interest Groups in International Relations, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process
 * Unencyclopedic essay

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. 9Nak (talk) 18:04, 30 November 2008 (UTC)

AfD nomination of The Role of Interest Groups in International Relations
I have nominated The Role of Interest Groups in International Relations, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/The Role of Interest Groups in International Relations. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. 9Nak (talk) 17:45, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. JohnCD (talk) 21:47, 1 December 2008 (UTC)

Deletion discussion
With regard to the concerns you raised here (and subsequently deleted): the fact that the article is unencyclopaedic is the entire problem. And it is not a problem that can be fixed through editing or rewriting; it is a basic incompatibility with Wikipedia policy. Please see the following policies and guidelines: That is merely my opinion, but I suspect others will agree and reaching such consensus is the purpose of the articles for deletion discussion now underway. Should that consensus be to delete then the article will be deleted by an administrator. 9Nak (talk) 10:52, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
 * No original research
 * What Wikipedia is not