User talk:Concernedhistorian

Welcome!

Hello, Concernedhistorian, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as PHI ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY AND LAMBDA ALPHA EPSILON SORORITY, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may soon be deleted.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type helpme on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! andy (talk) 09:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)
 * Starting an article
 * Your first article
 * Biographies of living persons
 * How to write a great article
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial

Speedy deletion nomination of PHI ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY AND LAMBDA ALPHA EPSILON SORORITY


A tag has been placed on PHI ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY AND LAMBDA ALPHA EPSILON SORORITY requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a club, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 09:36, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi! there andy.. This fraternity is a academic organization w/c its root of existence is mainly to protect the environment. It's not a popular fraternity like others as we are not showy. We are trained professionally, undergone various leadership training program. Because if you're going to report illegal activities you wouldn't tell the bad guys that it was who reported the said illegal activities, right?.. So pls andy don't delete this article. i made this article in behalf of my bros and sis and i'm having hard time editing and/or adding the references that made me edit my article multiple times. I'm so sorry but the system is not as user-friendly i'm used to. However the entire organization is asking you to pls don't delete the page. this is for us to let the wikipedia know that there's an organization specifically created to protect the environment long before we were born.. We are hoping for your kind consideration regarding this matter. thank and more power. Concernedhistorian (talk) 10:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

I have also accidentally clicked on "tagged for clean up"..Concernedhistorian (talk) 11:02, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Philippine Agricultural Educators (PAE) a.k.a. PHI ALPHA EPSILON


The article Philippine Agricultural Educators (PAE) a.k.a. PHI ALPHA EPSILON has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Soapboxy article full of obvious factual errors and with no relevant references. Fails WP:OR, WP:SOAP, WP:RS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. andy (talk) 09:40, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Hi! again andy. This article is the same as the phi alpha epsilon fraternity and lambda alpha epsilon sorority. i made some corrections as directed by the higher officers. They wanted to create an article for both PHI ALPHA EPSILON FRATERNITY AND ALPHA EPSILON SORORITY and add the references for PHILIPPINE AGRICULTURAL EDUCATORS as they are the same. an a.k.a. Since we are helping to protect the environment in underground basis for the longest time, the higher officers decided to go on public as the gov't is now aware that if they won't act whole heartedly in protecting the environment this could cause the annihilation of the species. again, we are hoping for your broad understanding on the subject matter. Thank you and more power.

P.S. This organization is also called, the sleeping giant.


 * Sorry, but wikipedia requires coverage in reliable sources. See WP:GNG. If there are no reliable sources the article will definitely not survive. andy (talk) 10:51, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Philippine Agricultural Educators (PAE) a.k.a. PHI ALPHA EPSILON for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Philippine Agricultural Educators (PAE) a.k.a. PHI ALPHA EPSILON is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Philippine Agricultural Educators (PAE) a.k.a. PHI ALPHA EPSILON until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. andy (talk) 10:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

May i know what kind of coverage in reliable sources you need?.Concernedhistorian (talk) 10:57, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

And how come there's a phi alpha epsilon article w/ no further details on how they are founded. While i'm writing an article w/ at least a brief history on how it is founded. unless you want me to write shorter details about my article..Concernedhistorian (talk) 11:00, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * The article is about the history of the fraternity but there is no evidence to show that what is said in the article is true. See WP:RS andy (talk) 11:14, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

How about this link "http://phialphaepsilon.ning.com/main/authorization/signIn?target=http%3A%2F%2Fphialphaepsilon.ning.com%2F"Concernedhistorian (talk) 11:46, 12 April 2011 (UTC)


 * That link is only available through registration (contrary to WP:ELREG). Moreover it's impossible to register anyway. So no, it certainly doesn't help in the slightest. andy (talk) 12:09, 12 April 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Philippine Agricultural Educators (PAE) a.k.a. PHI ALPHA EPSILON


A tag has been placed on Philippine Agricultural Educators (PAE) a.k.a. PHI ALPHA EPSILON requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. andy (talk) 20:49, 12 April 2011 (UTC)