User talk:Concurrence

Disambiguation link notification for January 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Swami Samarth, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sai Baba ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Swami_Samarth check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Swami_Samarth?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ* Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 25
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Eknath, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Marathi ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Eknath check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Eknath?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:52, 25 May 2020 (UTC)

November 2021
Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Indigenous Aryanism. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. Vanamonde (Talk) 06:35, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Indigenous Aryanism. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Austronesier (talk) 21:33, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

Important Notice
Vanamonde (Talk) 06:37, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

December 2021
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at History of Brahmin diet, you may be blocked from editing. Generalrelative (talk) 02:33, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

April 2022
Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Samarth Ramdas, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk!  11:43, 30 April 2022 (UTC)

May 2022
Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to History of Brahmin diet, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:04, 5 May 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)