User talk:Congrenw

hi i am andrew

hi andrew it me alice



Alicezha has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. You can spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend.

To spread the goodness of cookies, you can add {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Welcome!
Hello, Congrenw, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:17, 27 September 2017 (UTC)

Tv55e52's Peer Review
Please see below for my peer review:


 * "Job Performance," "Social Impacts," and "Relationships" are not the same size as "Culture" and "Innovation"; I assume they are meant to be the same size
 * Unnecessary to start the "Relationships" section with "in terms of relationships..."
 * Under "Culture," sentence would read better if it said: In collectivistic cultures, knowing the context and social status of the other person is essential to predicting their behavior.


 * These edits are very minor and super nit-picky because overall, it is a very well developed article with lots of great information! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tv55e52 (talk • contribs) 04:22, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Kaogra's Peer Review
Hi Congrenw! I think your article was very well done. Some smaller things I noticed were that the subheadings under Social approach didn't seem to fit very well together. Perhaps rewording these to have a more parallel language could be helpful. In general, it seems that each section was given similar amounts of attention and no specific section stood out as underwhelming so goo djob on that! One more thing I would add is more about the different case studies under Historical context - Major case studies. They seem very brief, and could have more details. Kaogra (talk) 19:15, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

Close paraphrase on Self-monitoring
Contributions submitted to wikipedia must be in your own words unless the content is available under a free license or there is no other way to rephrase the statement. See Wikipedia:Close_paraphrasing for more infromation on this policy. Morgan Kevin J (talk) 19:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)