User talk:Conker01

Welcome!
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I've noticed that you've been adding your signature to some of your article contributions. This is a simple mistake to make and is easy to correct. For future reference, the need to associate edits with users is taken care of by an article's edit history. Therefore, you should use your signature only when contributing to talk pages, the Village Pump, or other such discussion pages. For a better understanding of what distinguishes articles from these type of pages, please see What is an article?. Again, thanks for contributing, and enjoy your Wikipedia experience! Blake01 (talk) 18:07, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Your RFA...
...is very unlikely to be successful. I'm afraid you simply don't have enough experience to be presenting yourself for adminship. Also, you haven't edited since late 2007. I'd suggest continuing to contribute to Wikipedia and perhaps re-apply in 6 months. I'd also recommend you withdraw your RFA. – xeno  ( talk ) 18:02, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Some suggestions :-)
Hello there Conker01 :-) You haven't got too many edits, so I suspect you haven't got the knowledge of how we work to make an effective administrator. I recommend that you comment on some of out deletion discussions which really help you learn our content guidelines - take a look at what others are saying as well, and you'll soon pick them up. Carry on as you have been adding to content, it's always good to see :-) You say you revert vandalism, well we have programs to help with that such as WP:HUGGLE - it makes vandal fighting and reporting much easier and it really helps pick out vandalism to revert. It might be a good idea to give it a try and see how you like it. Apart from that, keep your head up here and any contributions you make are very much appreciated :-)  Ry an P os tl et hw ai te  18:11, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Your RfA was unsuccessful
Good Evening Conker01. Unfortunately, I closed your recent request for adminship per the generally accepted 'not-now' clause for RfAs that are not likely to succeed. Try to ensure that you take all the criticism in the oppose section constructively, and most importantly, communicate with those that voiced their opinion in your RfA, and, by discussion, you will eventually find a better ideal of what is needed in an administrative candidate and even try to look for improvements in yourself. As Ryan points out above, you need to increase your edits but at the same time helping the encyclopedia; whether it by anti-vandalism projects or article advancement, so to speak. This will eventually assist you in your development and give you general tips on the community on Wikipedia. Rud get  18:16, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Hello
I'm pleased you wanted to be an admin. Don't be disheartened by what happened - there's no way you could have passed, so soon after joining us.

Drop me a line in 3 months and I'll happily review your edits and let you know what you can do to sharpen up, ready to become an admin.

Cheers --Dweller (talk) 21:35, 24 July 2008 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Peerproductions.jpg
 Thanks for uploading File:Peerproductions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 14:18, 20 September 2014 (UTC)