User talk:Conn renn/sandbox

Peer Review

The overall additions you have made to the article seem to present good information. That being said, there are a few spots where sentence structure could be improved to make this information easier to comprehend and make the flow of the article better (I would go back and try to reword the 4th sentence in the first paragraph, the 3rd sentence in the the "Habitat" section, and the last sentence in the "Reproduction" section). I would also go through and make sure your capitalization is uniform when you use the different common names and I would make the word "which" lowercase in the 3rd sentence of the "Overview/Description" section. For the "Overview/Description" section, I would also maybe add some examples of the exceptions that you breifly mentioned so that the statement isn't so vague. I also noticed that there is a lot of information, but not a whole lot of citations, so I would just be careful with that and make sure you have everything cited that may need to be.

So far I think you've made a great start on your article. There are a few minor things that could be fixed, but all-in-all, good work!