User talk:ConnorDobson123

January 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Robbie Kay, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Robbie Kay was changed by ConnorDobson123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95047 on 2011-01-05T17:57:10+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:57, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

The recent edit you made to Robbie Kay constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Petrb (talk) 18:02, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Please do not add unsourced negative or controversial biographical material to pages, as you did with this edit to Robbie Kay. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. CarbonX (talk) 18:06, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at The Weald School, Billingshurst, you will be blocked from editing without further notice. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Weald School, Billingshurst was changed by ConnorDobson123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.882653 on 2011-01-05T21:03:27+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:03, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Connor Dobson


A tag has been placed on Connor Dobson requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Carl Sixsmith (talk) 21:08, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest policy and notability guidelines. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Admrboltz (talk) 21:23, 5 January 2011 (UTC)