User talk:Connormah/Archive 3

Coat of Arms of the Northwest Company & Nova Scotia
Hi!

They are coming along nicely, however university has also just started to come along too... :( so sadly I have to pause them for now, however by next week I will be able to start them again. The Nova Scotia Arms is quite straightforward but the NWC is going to be much more painful (especially for the eyes!), by that I mean the mantling. Don't worry I won't let your request go stale! Sodacan (talk) 22:00, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * the end of next week (if I'm lucky or at least one of them), probably Nova Scotia. Sodacan (talk) 23:16, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * It takes about two to three weeks, the Danish one took me a month the French maybe three weeks, it takes a long time because I do them little by little every day. But before I even start I google as many images related to the subject as I can and use as many sources as I can to trace from. But I do try to draw stuff of my own as much as humanly possible, but sometimes when there is just one good source then there is not much I can do and had to rely on it... sometimes entirely. Sodacan (talk) 20:40, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
 * I am really sorry, I have only been able to complete about 60% of the COA of Nova Sotia and about 10% of the NWC, the Nova Scotia should be finished soon but the NWC might take longer... hope you're not in a hurry for them, but I am swamped with University work right now. Sodacan (talk) 21:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Just an update, finished the escutcheon, the crest, mantling, the native supporter, the scottish unicorn, the creepy floating hands, the laurel leaves and the thistle leaves. All that is left are the motto and the compartment (probably the most difficult) should be done this weekend though. The NWC CofA however remains the same-sadly. Sodacan (talk) 22:27, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The COA of Nova Scotia is 90% done (the compartment with all the grass is really diffcult), while the COA for the Northwest Company is about 45% finish Sodacan (talk) 23:57, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * One of them should be... I know I keep extending the finish but once I get my artistic mojo back (real soon I hope) it should be done fairly quickly. Sodacan (talk) 00:02, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I don't know actually... I'll keep thinking, try the Lab again. If nothing happens, then when I have all this other stuff off my hands I could try and do it. But really sorry no names come to mind right now Sodacan (talk) 00:11, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * So its okay if i bumped this up to second instead of the NWC? Sodacan (talk) 00:18, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Yes!, do you want me to do it first? (before the NWC, but after the Nova Scotia) Sodacan (talk) 00:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)


 * One Down! Sodacan (talk) 07:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Thanks for nominating it! I didn't even know! Sodacan (talk) 17:46, 19 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Hello, hope you had a nice holiday, I just started the Victoria COA but then I realized that it is still under copyright only being registered in 2005. So I'm not sure if I will be allowed to upload it! Sodacan (talk) 14:52, 6 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure if I wanted to do it now if there is a chance it could get deleted for copyright violations. If their was a bigger resolution picture to trace it would make more sense than to created an entirely new (and not completely faithful) creation which might not be accepted. Sorry about this. Sodacan (talk) 01:49, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I have decided that I don't want to do them, they will take a long time since a clear and high resolution version is difficult to find and plus the original image is still under copyright which means there is a possibility (however slight it might be) of the finished product being deleted under fair-use, Sorry. Sodacan (talk) 12:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, just let me get some others out of the way first! Sodacan (talk) 14:23, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * was planning to do some Hapsburg and Austrian Empire arms (someone requested), Wanted to do some Prussian or German Empire arms (for myself). As well as redo the Napoleonic ones. Sodacan (talk) 22:58, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah why not, gonna be sick of all the eagles (Hapsburg, Prussian, Napoleonic, and Russian) by the time I'm finished! Sodacan (talk) 23:05, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
 * I might do one of your new requests soon, they look simple enough, sorry for the late reply been so busy with an article. Sodacan (talk) 00:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)


 * Might be awhile before I can do them, the Flag and the Eritrean COA are fine. I thought about doing the Australian one for a long time but never had the chance, it is quite a challenge. I might start with that one soon. Thanks by the way for the New Zealand FA nomination, shame it didn't take, but thanks for promoting my work so consistently. Your support is much appreciated! Sodacan (talk) 19:13, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Coat of arms
Just letting you know I haven't forgotten :) Best, Fvasconcellos (t·c) 12:20, 5 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I'm finally able to work on this. I apologize for the delay and will let you know when it's finished. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 02:09, 28 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Almost done (only the royal shield left to go; I lost my first attempt in a computer crash), although it looks positively... well, I don't even know what to say after seeing File:Coat of arms of Nova Scotia.svg above! Fvasconcellos (t·c) 22:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
 * All that's missing is the Royal Shield, which is coming along nicely. The rest is done. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 10:17, 7 January 2010 (UTC)

Signatures
No, sorry, I haven't found anything yet. But I've been tied up with some other stuff mostly and haven't had the time I'd like to devote to looking. I should be able to search more fully soon, and if I find anything I will let you know right away. Regards, MarmadukePercy (talk) 22:30, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

FACs
Brownlee's likely to be the next Premier I send there (I'm currently trying to figure out how to organize him; the current approach is John Edward Brownlee, Premiership of John Brownlee, which will probably be the first to go there on account of it having undergone a peer review, and John Brownlee as Attorney-General of Alberta), but I may take a detour from there with a few other submissions, including Accurate News and Information Act, Bankers' Toadies incident, and 1937 Social Credit backbenchers' revolt. We'll see. Anyway, thanks for your kind words. Steve Smith (talk) 23:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
 * That's the aim, though I hasten to add that I'm adhering rigorously to WP:DEADLINE in that project. Steve Smith (talk) 00:09, 17 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Stelmach was there May 9 of this year. He's the only Premier, but John Brownlee sex scandal had its day July 11. Steve Smith (talk) 00:32, 17 November 2009 (UTC)

Signatures
I've noticed you upgrading these signatures to SVG, and I appreciate it. Unfortunately, I don't have a single source for all of them. I just include the ones I come across. Mostly, old books that include a portrait and signature of the governor; newer books don't seem to do that much. Gabriel Slaughter will be a tough one. There isn't a whole lot on him, and during his term, he wasn't very popular, mainly because he succeeded George Madison, who was insanely popular. As soon as I find a signature, I include it in the person's article, so if there isn't one there, I haven't found it yet. I've done every Kentucky governor from Isaac Shelby chronologically to Earle C. Clements. Sorry I can't be more help. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 15:05, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

PAA images
Well, I'm not a lawyer (yet), but my assessment is in line with yours. Owning a physical copy of an image does not give you any rights to control the distribution of copies of those images. Maybe take it up at WP:MCQ? Steve Smith (talk) 02:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure, pass it on. Maybe I'll pick up something I can use on my impending finals.  Maybe just forward their e-mail to me in its entirety? Steve Smith (talk) 02:39, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * The more I think about, the more convinced I become that they don't have any basis for their request. I'm not sure if you followed it, but some months ago there was an issue in which an editor uploaded thousands of images from the British National Portrait Gallery to the Commons (see c:Category:National Portrait Gallery, London).  The Gallery took issue with this, but their only basis for complaint was that under British copyright law (though not American, and I'm pretty sure not Canadian either) the act of reproducing a two dimensional work can renew copyright, such that even though the paintings are in the public domain, the digital versions of them are under the copyright of the National Portrait Gallery (again, under British law only).  Since that doesn't apply here, we should be fine (though, as always, not a lawyer, not legal advice, etc.). Steve Smith (talk) 03:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I'll deal with it (I already sent them an e-mail, on which I bcc'd you). Of course, if things escalate I'll have to punt it over to Wikimedia Foundation counsel, but at this point as I understand it things are sufficiently clearcut that there's not likely to be any need to do so). Steve Smith (talk) 03:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
 * I'll definitely forward it to you if I get anything. Nothing yet (of course, it's the weekend). Steve Smith (talk) 00:14, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * We should definitely leave them in. If they provide a coherent rationale, we can deal with it then.  If they escalate to legal threats, we can pass it over to Mike Godwin.  There's no reason to remove public domain material based on a request with no explanation of the law behind it. Steve Smith (talk) 00:20, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * Well, they've already gotten an e-mail from me questioning their authority to make that request and politely asking for them to explain whence it's derived; I think implied in that is that we're not taking them down until they explain why they're entitled to tell us to. If you want to respond, go ahead, but I think they're well aware that we have no intention of acting on their request until they back it up with something. Steve Smith (talk) 00:41, 7 December 2009 (UTC)
 * My suspicion is that that fee is for print-ready material; the images we have are probably too low resolution to be useful for that. That's just a guess, though. Steve Smith (talk) 00:39, 8 December 2009 (UTC)

Please Don't Revert Valid Edits Without Checking TALK page
re: Please Don't Revert Valid Edits Without Checking TALK page

Hi there! Your message indicates you didn't understand why promotional material such as company names, product placement/endorsements, etc. were deleted from the post-plumbing section of the Joe the Plumber article.

Please refrain from deleting edits simply because you don't understand them. There was dialogue and discussion on the talk page which would have helped you understand why the edits you reverted had been made. 174.21.18.111 (talk) 00:24, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Re:

 * I see you have added the friendly notice to your talk page. I'm glad you could see through the error I made on my respose.  I meant to respond that I had " no unique rights " to the text.  See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  14:36, 12 January 2010 (UTC)

Scalia
Well, Scalia is for sure next, I've already started preliminary work. I've gotten first Soviet premier, first UK Prime Minister, first Canada PM is very likely shortly, no one has gotten a FA on a Supreme Court Justice, so going to make that happen. And I like Scalia. He spoke at my law school 20 years ago, don't remember too much of what he said, except he talked about a constitution that had all these rights listed in it, turned out to be the Soviet constitution (this was 1988, I think). I'll look at Hayes when I get some time, but I see so few solid FA writers, so many spending their time on hurricane articles.--Wehwalt (talk) 05:28, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Scalia is at Peer Review. Many thanks for help with Dief, who was promoted.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:44, 1 February 2010 (UTC)

Henry Clay Portrait
This one is great. Definitely better than the other ones. Full view of his face, good quality, relevant age when taken, etc. Well done. In.Lumine.Tuo.Videbimus.Lumen 04:22, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
For watching over my user talk. And this is a bet I'm sure the poster will lose. See ya round  Tide  rolls  23:58, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Haha, definately. Anytime! Connormah (talk) 23:59, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Spencer Wilding
Just a friendly heads up on Spencer Wilding. I declined the speedy because his pro boxing career, brief as it is, is a claim of meeting WP:ATHLETE. However, sources are seriously lacking, so it won't break my heart if you take this to AfD. Cheers! -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  01:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. I'll let another editor deal with it if they oppose your decline of the speedy. Connormah (talk) 01:34, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Photo deletions
You reverted the addition of some photos added to the Education in Jamaica article without explanation. May I ask what the issue was? I had tole the user to add them there, as he eas tryhing to squeeze 5 or 6 photos into a small section on the Jamaica page. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 02:50, 19 January 2010 (UTC)


 * No problem, I just wanted to make sure there wasn't a serious issue there that needed to be dealt with. Thanks. - BilCat (talk) 03:13, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Great Job

 * My Apologies for my delayed response.I have myself never used the List Builder's function.This shows how to add pages and use itPharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 00:35, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Deletion of comments on my Talk page
I just noticed that you deleted a comment on my talkpage left by IP user 76.123.99.101. Considering the nature of the message I wasn't terribly keen on keeping it nor do I mind that you removed it but just wanted to know out of curiosity if there was any particular reason you decided to take it upon yourself to delete it. Is it part of policy or some sort of admin practice that commonly takes place?Nefariousski (talk) 01:14, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Gwendolen Clarke
I have nominated Gwendolen Clarke, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Gwendolen Clarke. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Glenfarclas  ( talk ) 03:33, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Koman90, A+ (talk) 23:26, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

Poxy
I'm sure a poxy isn't a pineapple, and certainly the Tupi indians didn't say "lulz" to mean "pineapple". MeisterChief (talk) 01:51, 22 January 2010 (UTC)

Signatures
I see that you have converted some authors' signatures into svgs, and I thought I'd suggest/enquire whether you would do these ones, too: File:Stephenie meyer signature.png, File:Daniel handler signature.png, File:Dan brown signature.png, File:Danielle steel signature.png, File:Mary higgins clark signature.png, File:Lemony snicket signature.png, File:Eoin colfer signature.png, File:Christopher paolini signature.png. — the Man in Question (in question)  02:33, 22 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. — the Man in Question (in question)  09:00, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Looks like you've been busy. I appreciate the bit of tidying up. See ya 'round  Tide  rolls  01:25, 25 January 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. See you around, too! Connormah (talk) 01:27, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

John Adams
I see you removed your peer review request from my talk page, but have now posted it on Brian Boulton's page. Brian is one of Wikipedia's best peer reviewers, so asking him was probably wise, but can I ask why you de-asked me? And while I'm asking you stuff, why does a good Canadian boy choose the second President of the U.S. as his first FA-drive? Steve Smith (talk) 03:55, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

BC Ferries logo
To comply with BC Ferries' branding specifications, you need to add a minimum amount of clear space on all four sides of the logo. The minimum amount is equal to the height of the lowercase "e" in the logo.

--  Denelson83  04:36, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

Talk:John Adams#Referencing
I reviewed the work needed to fix some of the citation issues noted at Talk:John Adams but got bogged down with it. So, I left a note on the talk pages of, and  who I saw mentioned multiple times in the article's history from around 2007. I am hoping they will take a look at helping us. I am letting you know this in case you had thought of contacting some of the earlier editors, to avoid duplication of effort. Sswonk (talk) 04:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Possible RfA
Hey David, I have been pondering self-nominating my self for adminship in the near future, but have not made my mind up yet. User:Wehwalt has suggested that I take up writing an article before I go ahead, and I am planning to do just that, but I would greatly appreciate another opinion from someone else, also, in addition to Wehwalt's comments (I greatly trust both of you), to take into consideration. Any comments/suggestions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. If you could reply on my talk, that'd be great. Thanks again. Connormah (talk) 02:50, 29 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Hello! I read the discussion on Wehwalt's talk page, and I agree with the advice that you received there.
 * Good luck with whatever course you take! —David Levy 06:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Actually, during my own RfA, I certainly answered questions honestly, but also checked to see how others had answered them to ensure I was not too far out of whack, which fortunately I wasn't. Appropos of nothing.--Wehwalt (talk) 03:49, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
 * as a friend, I suggest you will find a future AfD go better, if you withdraw this one now.    DGG ( talk ) 20:14, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm planning to withdraw tomorrow. Thanks. Connormah (talk | contribs) 20:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

RedandNater.com
Can you lock the RedandNater.com article? Someone keeps trying to copy obscene posts from the message board (the board is a regional radio industry message board known for not moderating and censoring, similar to Cafepharma.com)-- milk the cows (Talk) 18:37, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

Aberhart
I'm actually planning on resuming work on Aberhart in the next couple of days; I wouldn't object to help, but I find too people working on a first draft to be kind of a pain. Maybe you work on the first draft of Bulyea and I do Aberhart, then we switch, or something? I don't know; I'm open to suggestions from you. Steve Smith (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

John Adams - peer review
I have read the comments at Peer review/John Adams/archive2 and they are about what I expected, very good. In order to avoid duplication of effort, I will at first offer to do two of the listed items: 1) work on fixing all refs, formatting using the cite template and 2) replace all the double hyphens with the proper dashes. Basically, what I am suggesting is that you give me a scheduled time that you want me to do this, during which you won't be editing the article. No edit conflicts, no problems, right? Let me know, and I will take care of those two items during a time we can agree on (an hour should be enough and safe when taking into account real life interruptions, etc.). Sswonk (talk) 23:48, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 01:43, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

AIV Reporting
You may have more luck at WP:UAA with. As you may know, editors are supposed to be sufficiently warned before reporting and rarely get blocked for one vandal edit. -- Neil N   talk to me  05:57, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Your withdrawn RfA
While I agree that you should take some time to reflect upon the feedback you received, I just wanted to commend you for the maturity you showed in dealing with the situation. I'd like you to know that my "oppose" vote is in no way a reflection on you personally, and that I would be more than happy to reconsider it at a future RfA. Happy editing, and hope to see you back there soon! Throwaway85 (talk) 00:53, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I aim to try my best to address all concerns before my next RfA. Thanks again for your time you took in commenting. Connormah (talk | contribs) 01:02, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Peter Bielkowicz
I removed the speedy tag. He was and still is notable. Bearian (talk) 02:41, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No problema. Bearian (talk) 02:44, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

RfA
Don't worry too much about it. As I said, it laid the groundwork for next time.--Wehwalt (talk) 14:34, 9 February 2010 (UTC)

Possibly unfree File:Zurlain2.JPG
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Zurlain2.JPG, has been listed at Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

File:630 CHED Logo.svg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:630 CHED Logo.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:33, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Felipe Menegaz Sig.svg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Felipe Menegaz Sig.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:28, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Coat of Arms Reagan Shield 1.png missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Coat of Arms Reagan Shield 1.png is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:37, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File:US 10th Division Insignia.svg missing description details
Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:US 10th Division Insignia.svg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:49, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * It would be useful to know the source of the original Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:49, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

File:US 10th Division Insignia.svg
Right, have updated it... All you need to do know is find someway of including the upload history of the raster version, and it's done...

Don't forget to tag the original for commons move as well :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:49, 13 February 2010 (UTC)


 * The style used for the informationshould be a model for other 'conversions', The atrtribution, licensing, description information on the original raster image should be merged if possible...

Given you seem to have plenety of experience with images, I'll leave you to consider updating other images you've uploaded, accordingly.. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:52, 13 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks
Thank you for removing vandalism from my userpage.  Nerdy Science Dude :)  (✉ click to talk • my edits • sign) 21:54, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Infobox:curler
Be my guest. I feel it's redundant if it's already in the article, but I wont stop anyone from including it. -- Earl Andrew - talk 12:48, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

re:Infoboxes
Because the colours you have been choosing have been really distracting. The light blue in particular looked out of place, so I thought it would be better with a neutral colour. -- Scorpion 0422  23:44, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Why does each sport need an individual colour? Why not just go with the normal colour? -- Scorpion 0422  23:47, 16 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I think the #99bdcc works pretty well. -- Scorpion 0422  23:55, 16 February 2010 (UTC)

Edmonton capitalex logo
Hi there,

I see that you are the uploader of the out dated File:Edmonton capitalex logo.svg. I came here to ask you to block out the dates of the logo, as they only applied to 2008 and 2009, but as I visit http://www.capitalex.ca/ I see the logo has changed colours to red and appears more 3D, now I ask if you could please upload an entirely new logo, as I don't have SVG software. Thanks, 117Avenue (talk) 01:07, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, much appreciated. 117Avenue (talk) 05:20, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

It is not vandalism.
I ain't vandalising anything. I'm only creating a category with british and american english differences. Some adm of wikipedia told me to do it. There is a category in the brazilian version of wikipedia and I read the rules, there isn't anything that say to me to do not that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Fuckyourpanic (talk • contribs) 00:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

SVG'd flag of the AU
Hi, Connormah. I completed a new version for the file File:Flag of the African Union 2010.svg. Regards, -- RA (talk) 03:21, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * That looks great. Thanks so much! Connormah (talk | contribs) 03:22, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Signature
Please use the &amp;#124; character rather than the | character in your signature as the | character can break templates (such as vandalism information). — MC10 ( T • C • GB •L)  05:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Your signature
Hey Connormah, I noticed your signature has a pipe in it. If you wouldn't mind, can you change it to a &amp;#124; instead? This will appear exactly the same, but it will help when you use your signature in templates (like you did at Template:Vandalism information recently). Just letting you know! -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 05:25, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * And I see User:MC10 beat me... -- Sh i r ik ( Questions or Comments? ) 05:26, 21 February 2010 (UTC)
 * I was wondering why that happened...sure, I'll change it when I get the time to, thanks for the note! Connormah (talk | contribs) 05:40, 21 February 2010 (UTC)

Ed cut.jpg
Sorry about that. I will remove the image now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BlueCornPie (talk • contribs) 21:22, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Request for SVG signature conversion
Would be able to create an SVG version of File:Konstantin Rodzaevsky Signature.PNG, the signature of Konstantin Rodzaevsky, in SVG. Many thanks. --Kolchak1923 ( talk ) 03:39, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. I'll wait. --Kolchak1923 ( talk ) 20:09, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 07:55, 27 February 2010 (UTC)

Re:Deletion of Zurlain2.jpg
-  F ASTILY  (T ALK ) 04:33, 25 February 2010 (UTC)