User talk:Connormah/Archive 5

Signature query
Hello, sorry not to have gotten back to you about Marco Polo, but I was never able to find his signature online. I wondered if perhaps you might be able to help me out with extracting this signature for the entry of Daniel Coit Gilman? Many thanks -- again! Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 04:12, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No rush. I really appreciate your help. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 04:15, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Darn, you are fast! That looks spectacular, actually. MarmadukePercy (talk) 04:40, 25 February 2010 (UTC)

Note
Hi there Connormah. I wanted to talk about this revert. While it is correct in this case, as this was a highly debated FA (many lengthy FACs over it), your edit summary concerns me a bit. Featured articles are certainly not perfect, and they should not be. That's why we have FAR ;). Just wanted to make sure you knew that, :)  ceran  thor 19:31, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No, I agree with it. I just wanted to let you know that FAs are certainly not perfect.  ceran  thor 19:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Thank you.
Thanks for reverting the IP address' vandalism on my talk page. - Zhang He (talk) 19:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 19:38, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Another signature query
Hi, this one might seem kind of dumb, but can you extract a signature from an image this small? I was hoping to get a signature for the elusive General Joseph Martin of Virginia. Many thanks for having a look. MarmadukePercy (talk) 05:49, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hm, is there any possibility of a better image of the signature? I can certainly do it, but I don't think this image will work, as the detail level is very low. Thanks. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 05:20, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, thanks, that's what I was afraid of. I will look for a better image in the Library of Congress archive, although there might not be one. Thanks for letting me know. MarmadukePercy (talk) 05:27, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, thanks. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 05:30, 4 March 2010 (UTC)
 * This one is a little bit larger, and I might be able to grab a bigger version using screenshot from the Library of Congress files. Just thought I'd run it by you. Thanks again. MarmadukePercy (talk) 19:55, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Maps for vectorising
Hi

Do you still need these maps  ?

If so let me know

Chaosdruid (talk) 08:14, 3 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Yes, if you would be able, it would be great. Thanks, Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 05:18, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Request for SVG signature conversion
Would be able to create an SVG version of it:File:Firmaduce2.gif, the signature of Benito Mussolini, in SVG. Many thanks. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 11:13, 8 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ok. Thank you. --Kolchak1923 (talk) 15:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

Requested work
Here you go! Sodacan (talk) 18:23, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Henri Poincare
Thanks for finding the new photograph of Henri Poincare. Its startled appearance, unknown date and provenance make it unsuitable in my opinion for the lead portrait of the Poincare article. I have included it to the Henri Poincare gallery in Commons. Lumos3 (talk) 23:25, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
 Ker αun oςc op ia◁ galaxies  04:14, 12 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RSO Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:RSO Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 08:24, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Mount Royal College Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Mount Royal College Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 09:53, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Another signature request
Hello again. I wondered if you might be able to grab a signature from this letter from photographer and lawyer Col. Leavitt Hunt to John George Nicolay, private secretary to President Abraham Lincoln, in which Hunt requests a copy of Lincoln's signature? Many thanks, again, for all your help! Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 11:16, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * And one more. :-) I wondered if this image is large enough to pull the signature of Nicholas Gilman? Gilman was subsequently a signer of the United States Constitution. Thanks again and have a lovely weekend. All best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:08, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, I'll get to them ASAP. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 22:48, 13 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, you left me a message on my talk page the other day, but when I came here to get it, there was no message. MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:02, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I've got Hunt's done. See File:Leavitt Hunt Signature.svg. I'll get to the others soon. Cheers! Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 04:23, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Many, many thanks! Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 17:18, 22 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi, I wasn't able to get Leavitt Hunt's signature to register on his infobox. Do you happen to know if I am flubbing it somehow, or does the template need to be changed, or....? Many thanks for the help. MarmadukePercy (talk) 01:28, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Boston University Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Boston University Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you recieved this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 13:25, 13 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RSE Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:RSE Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:24, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:YUCrest.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:YUCrest.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 04:36, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RSW Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:RSW Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 16:51, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Images
Hi, I nominated File:Vince Shlomi 2.jpg and File:Dan Tencer.jpg for deletion as copyright violations. Regards Hekerui (talk) 18:42, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I was actually given permission for the second one, and will request that the subject sends a message to OTRS. As for the second one, a duplicate of the file was verified through OTRS Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 18:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Let's hope he sends one, asking people for permission and explaining copyright issues to them is pretty much always a hassle :) Best Hekerui (talk) 19:00, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Btw I love your userpage, it's so well structured! Hekerui (talk) 19:02, 14 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks. I'll try and get this sorted out ASAP. Thanks for the heads up. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 22:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sleeman.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sleeman.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.


 * If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 19:13, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:RSP Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:RSP Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.


 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.


 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.


 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.


 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 20:30, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Recently deleted image
Got your note. The image looked like a garden variety mislicensed image from Flickr, but I see now that it was a proper PD image. Sorry for the deletion, but good job getting the photographer to release it.-- Kubigula (talk) 03:45, 16 March 2010 (UTC)

FP Nomination for new COA
Just to tell you I just nominated a picture here at Wikipedia: Featured picture candidates/Royal Coat of Arms of the Kingdom of Greece. Sodacan (talk) 17:56, 17 March 2010 (UTC)

Alec Douglas-Home photo
Any progress on the licencing? All the best, BartBassist (talk) 14:01, 18 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I just got a message from the uploader saying that we could use it, but the uploaded did not indicate an email had been sent yet. I replied asking the uploader to send to OTRS, but no reply yet. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 21:37, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Classic Final.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Classic Final.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 23:34, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Jose Marti
You might want to be more "extra extra extra" careful when uploading photos and claiming them to be a person when they are not that person, it can really screw people up because i made a derivative work of that photo @ White Latin American article in which i used that photo to make this tedious collage. Thanks--Wikiscribe (talk) 17:01, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Birth date and age
Hello, I noticed that you added the "birth date and age" template to Red Anderson, George Brown (ice hockey), and George Abbott (ice hockey). As these people are not known to be living (just possibly living), this template is not appropriate as them being that age cannot be verified. Thanks and Cheers, CP 23:19, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, I see now. Apologies, my brain has seemed to shut down for the weekend! See you around. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 23:20, 19 March 2010 (UTC)

Benin COA
Hi,

Are you sure that File:Benin COA.png is public domain? --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:58, 20 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KUWordmark.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:KUWordmark.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:42, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KU Seal.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:KU Seal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:52, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

Canadian federal election, 1957
As one of the people who commented on the Diefenbaker FAC, would you mind taking a look at this FAC here? It's getting long in the tooth at FAC and has gotten little comment. Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:24, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

My mistake
Yes, is not the same person, but only here. My bigger mistake, sorry and thanks. @lestaty discuţie 03:57, 23 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, the enwiki is a good community. :D @lestaty discuţie 04:01, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Hi
Thank you so much for coming to my defense. Keepscases (talk) 04:39, 23 March 2010 (UTC)

Gough Whitlam sources
Latest project. Any sources on a signature?--Wehwalt (talk) 17:20, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * I'll take a look later tonight. It shouldn't be that hard. CMAH (talk) 18:42, 24 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Inserted into the article. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 03:24, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 05:57, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

John A. Macdonald
Thanks for voting for me, I almost gave up the moment the user wrote that he didn't like the faces of the supporters! anyway, pass or not, it doesn't matter much. I really must apologise for being so tardy lately, this is my last year of university I have got a ton of work and have not had the time to fulfil some of the requests, however still want to do ALL of them. BTW I will definitely take John A. Macdonald's COA, It should be done earlier than expected because it is rather uncomplicated. Hopefully after June (when my last semester ends) I can churn out some more art.Sodacan (talk) 11:44, 25 March 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 13:28, 25 March 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:LA Police Badge.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:LA Police Badge.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:34, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

File:Toddychoddyzacharytowowellogo2.png listed for deletion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Toddychoddyzacharytowowellogo2.png, has been listed at Files for deletion. Please see the to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. —Bkell (talk) 01:52, 31 March 2010 (UTC)

Nikolai Gogol
Re: I like that painted portrait a lot. But wouldn't the only existing photographic portrait of him be more credible in the infobox? Garik 11 (talk) 08:44, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * Actually, the more I think about it, I'll switch it back, and move the portrait down. Thanks. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 16:03, 1 April 2010 (UTC)
 * That's exactly what I meant, too. Thank you. Garik 11 (talk) 19:52, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MSU seal.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:MSU seal.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 14:59, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Halifax INTL Airport Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Halifax INTL Airport Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 00:10, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Feline range maps
Are you still interested in the range maps? Maybe I could have some time for that next week. Do you know if there's a source for the information? &mdash; Sebastian 12:17, 17 April 2010 (UTC)

SVG Done
Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop

The SVG you requested at the GL is now done.  Y zm o  talk  19:33, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Orthographic maps
Hi Connormah,

How are those orthographic globes made? I want to make one centred on North Africa. --Slashme (talk) 17:54, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

AfD nomination of List of Canadian flags
An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is List of Canadian flags. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Articles for deletion/List of Canadian flags. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

Talkback
Smallman12q (talk) 16:14, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

RfA thanks
Regards -- Александр Дмитрий (Alexandr Dmitri) (talk) 16:50, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:MSU Seal 2010.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:MSU Seal 2010.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 06:21, 28 May 2010 (UTC)

SVG logos
That's really great that you're working to upload SVG version of logos, however it would be appericated if you could add SVG-Logo to them as well. Don't worry about previous uploads I'll take care of those and other SVG logos later. FinalRapture - † ☪ 23:39, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I will do so. I was under the impression that a bot does that as well, but I'll do it from now on. Thanks! Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 23:41, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * It would seem that there isn't a bot that does it or it's just broken. Nonetheless I'll be coding one that does that shortly. Thanks for helping FinalRapture - † ☪ 23:44, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * That'd be great if you could do so. Thanks for your help. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 23:45, 29 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Ah, it was MifterBot I that used to do that tagging. I have no idea if it is still performing that function, but it appears not. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 23:52, 29 May 2010 (UTC)

RfPP
Hey, if you get something crazy like that in future, drop a note on my talk page as well- if I'm on, it'll be done instantly and the worst case scenario is I don't see it in time and someone else will probably protect it. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   01:21, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

John Wooden
If you need a bit more protection, just let me know. Courcelles (talk) 01:22, 4 June 2010 (UTC)
 * 23:53, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Microsoft Excel Icon.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Microsoft Excel Icon.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:15, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Microsoft Powerpoint Icon.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Microsoft Powerpoint Icon.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:17, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Knott
Hey, sorry for the delayed response; I just wanted to confirm that what you've done re: Knott's birth date looks good to me. Steve Smith (talk) 00:05, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Accountcreator icon
Hi, I've left you a reply at the Graphic_Lab/Illustration_workshop, well actually three of them, but that was simply me failing to concentrate. Completefailure (talk) 23:03, 6 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, it's all worked out now. See you around. CMAH (Connormah's Sock) 00:51, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

RfA
Hi Connormah. It's been awhile I know, but I haven't forgotten. Are you ready to give it another shot? -  F ASTILYsock (T ALK ) 19:07, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Nicholas Gilman signature
Hi, I asked awhile back if this image is large enough to pull a signature from? If not, I can try to find another. Just let me know at your convenience. Thanks. MarmadukePercy (talk) 19:12, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Sorry to trouble you. I'll ask someone else. MarmadukePercy (talk) 03:13, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks for creating the signature and posting to the piece as well. I can well understand how busy we all can get, and I appreciate your taking the time to do this. It looks great. Enjoy your weekend. Best, MarmadukePercy (talk) 18:27, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Hosni Mubarak photo
hello, apparently we seem to have a problem with the previous mentioned topic, i keep updating it with the latest photo and you keep reverting my edit. i have added the sources and copyright info to the image that were missing, also i've started a discussion about it with wikipedian suggestions welcomed, is this a fair enough middle-ground solution? your opinion is valued, awaiting your reply

Ezz zombie (talk) 20:52, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the update. Unfortunately, stating that the permission is non-restricted isn't going to cut it. We either need an email sent to OTRS, or something on the webpage the image was from to state it's non-restricted use. Thanks for your patience, though, I can be a bugger sometimes :) Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 21:41, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

done, sent a mail to dailynews.co.uk and asked them to sent a mail to OTRS providing copyright claim. hopefully they'll reply before the photo is removed. Ezz zombie (talk) 22:59, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks, I'll tag the image with an OTRS-pending tag until the issue is resolved. Thanks! Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 00:29, 10 June 2010 (UTC)

Lois Hole
Was Lois Hole born on 19 January 1929 or 29 January 1929 (both dates are cited in the article). also any sourcing to confirm? Thanks. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Never mind. I guess you don't know. Thanks anyway. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 00:14, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank spam!
TFOWR 20:54, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Signature
Can you do me a signature for Ernest Augustus I of Hanover? The image can be found here. Many thanks.--Wehwalt (talk) 14:58, 12 June 2010 (UTC)

Rollback
No need for the rollback tool, the tedious part is looking at the list to find the bad changes and make sure I go far enough back to get all of them. I have few tools and keep them close to hand and sharp. --Wtshymanski (talk) 19:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Again, thanks for the offer, but no thanks. See below for at least one reason. --Wtshymanski (talk) 12:54, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Apologies
Slipped with finger and hit rollback vandal by mistake. No intention to label you as a vandal. Justin talk 20:49, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

There really is no need to leave a message on my talk page every time you reply. I do have a watchlist you know. Justin talk 19:25, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Cook Arms, Thanks
Thanks for weighing in on this matter! Your comments are greatly appreciated. Its really turned into a tempest in a teacup. I'm not familiar enough with a lot of WP rules to debate these things very well. I simply don't understand what the problem is. The individual who doesn't like the work appears to believe that because it is not a reproduction of the original artist's interpretation of the blazon text, it is somehow invalid (original, a cheap copy, whatever). That is very much against the nature of heraldry. A rendering which fits the text is always valid. If there is anything I can say or do to improve the situation please let me know. Thanks again for helping. A1 Aardvark (talk) 00:07, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks for your most recent comment. It is a bit nerve-wracking having your work judged so harshly.  I appreciate the encouragement.  I note he has put it up on the OR message board.  What should I do about that?  How will I know the outcome of the deletion request?  I am facing a similar one over here and still haven't heard anything about its outcome.  (It's been two months!) http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Ann_Meekitjuk_Hanson_Arms.svg


 * Any thoughts on that? Of the hundred or more arms I've done these are the only ones that have caused "major" trouble.  They have rather tainted my experience.  —Preceding unsigned comment added by A1 Aardvark (talk • contribs) 00:16, 16 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Major trouble?
 * As an aside ever read WP:BRD? The discussion is still ongoing on the talk page.  Justin talk 14:11, 16 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. Apologies. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 17:45, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Victoria CoA (again) & Another Request
Sorry I have been MIA for a while, I have been really busy lately:

1) The Victoria COA, if you really wanted it, I could make it for you. But my objection to making it, was that when I finish with it, I will have to upload it under a non-free license because in Canada (unlike in the UK), the work of the heraldic authority is not free. This is the case for the which is still under copy-write. The COA of the city of Victoria (a wonderful city BTW, I visited in 2007, had tea at the Empress), was granted in 2005. So even a representation of the blazon could still violate the Canadian Heraldic Authority's license, This I am not wiling to do. Even if it was uploaded into the english Wikipedia under a non-free license (like fair use), there is still a chance of it getting deleted. Again that I am not willing to try, one of my worst fears since I started doing artworks was the possibility of one of my works (which I often spend weeks on) getting deleted by some eagle-eyed copywrite-nazi admin, that is why I often stick to historical, rather than more modern subjects. But if you insist, then I will keep it in my list.

2) As for Captain Cook's arms, I would gladly try my hands at it (but like all my assurances now, will take time, so many unfinished requests....). But I am a little apprehensive because I think by doing so I would undermine the original user/artist's arguments which I completely and wholeheartedly agree with (after reading the entire discussion). The Arms are great, and to me heraldically correct. The shield itself is a perfectly acceptable representation, some people use just the crest to identify themselves (in this case the scary flying arm holding the Union Jack), or even just a badge. So the other user's claims (indeed his threat to have the image deleted) is quite unjustified. If his objections were artistic (such as the look on faces similarity to this and that), then he should say so and then show himself as being absolutely ignorant about heraldry and his opinions on the matter- delicately ignored. Despite this I understand why the user would have 'objections', heraldry is a weird and fruitless artistic science that is difficult for outsiders to understand, especially with its rules and traditions. I have had this kind of criticism before, and expect much more in the future. So, unwilling to appease the user with the wrong arguments, I am don't feel very comfortable to just step in and undermine the original user/artist- for principle's sake. Only when the argument dies down and the image is kept and the artist victorious, then will I feel comfortable enough to undermine him with a better and full version of my own (I do enjoy doing that). Sodacan (talk) 13:44, 17 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Hi Connormah, I hadn't seen your request for arms for John A. MacDonald until now. I know sodacan's work is much better than mine, and I would be pleased if he did a more professional version of anything I've hacked away at, but I just wanted to make sure you'd seen the arms I had put on MacDonald's page.  Anyway, just checking.  Cheers. A1 Aardvark (talk) 04:13, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've seen the version, it looks great, and I have no problem with it, but I think a fuller version would be better if possible. Keep up the great work, Aardvark, however. It's, I'm sure appreciated by lots. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 04:17, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the encouragement. A1 Aardvark (talk) 04:21, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Anytime. If I may ask, is there any possibility of seeing any more Canadian Prime Minister Coat of Arms (or have you done them all already?)? Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 04:23, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * I've done these ones:
 * http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Canadian_Prime_Ministers_Arms_by_A1_Aardvark
 * I found the few blazons that there are at:
 * http://www.heraldry.ca/main.php
 * I do not have the ability to create the two I have not already produced.
 * When sodacan's versions of the arms are done, will mine be deleted off the common as redundant? Or do they stay on there and only come off the wikipedia page?  Just curious.  I enjoy putting the arms together, but they do take quite a bit of work and I'd hate to be creating them only to have them all completely supplanted a year or two later. All of the arms I've done are categorised (roughly) on my commons userpage. A1 Aardvark (talk) 04:35, 18 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Nope, they'll stay, but they'll probably get replaced on the respective person's page, but I could add a link to yours on the 'Other Versions' field at Commons. Sounds good, thanks again. Connormah (talk &#124; contribs) 20:38, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned images
If you're just uploading vector versions, then I'm perfectly fine not getting a notification. Thanks for letting me know, though. --fuzzy510 (talk) 21:52, 18 June 2010 (UTC)

RfA
Thank you very much for your contribution to my Rfa. I have made a comment about it at User talk:JamesBWatson which you are, of course, very welcome to read if you wish to. JamesBWatson (talk) 14:31, 21 June 2010 (UTC)

Amundsen
My apologies also. Edit summaries leave only so much room to try to state what is going on. Another apology is due because I am a techno ignoramus. I do not know how to clear my cache. If this is something easy to do could you please leave me a message on how to do it. If, on the other hand, it is a bit involved don't worry about using up your time on trying to educate me about something that I am sure is easy for most everyone. At this moment I am still seeing both signatures but if it is cleaned up for you I won't worry about it. It is nice to know that Roald's page has a diligent editor like you protecting it. Cheers and happy editing. MarnetteD | Talk 19:39, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the info that worked slick as a whistle. I had a feeling that it was going to be something easy to do. If you haven't seen The Last Place on Earth I can recommend it. It is the first thing that I ever saw that gave the Norwegians equal time onscreen with the Brits and it helped me to get a sense of who each of them was. I think that The Red Tent is also worth a look. I don't know that it has much to tell a viewer about Amundsen but there is one scene that I really like. Hardy Krüger as Lundborg is having a conversation with Sean Connery's Amundsen; "L-The book was a touch theatrical A-For whom would I have been performing? L-For yourself A-But that is not theatrical, that's necessary. The trick is to choose a good part." I think that may sum up Connery's career on film better than the reams of interviews and film critic's columns that I have read over the years. If you've already seen these, or if you see them and wind up disliking them, I can only apologize for taking up your time. Thanks again for everything. MarnetteD | Talk 21:30, 22 June 2010 (UTC)

Hell's Kitchen S7
I'll edit the table with 705. 706 will be added after 30 mins to make it look live. Altarep (talk) 00:23, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * 705 & 706 added and table corrected. Please edit the episode guides. Thanks! Altarep (talk) 01:13, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

706 has already finished airing in Canada. - Katanin (talk) 01:45, 23 June 2010 (UTC)


 * 706 is still airing in the US as we speak. I know citytv had the better advantage but it would be best to leave the FOX viewers waiting. My results as well as Katanin's (talk his page) reflected the results after watching on citytv. Altarep (talk) 01:47, 23 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Why wait? As soon as an episode is done airing on one place, the results/content will be all over the internet instantly. If the FOX viewers don't want to be spoiled, then they should just avoid the internet until they're done watching. - Katanin (talk) 01:51, 23 June 2010 (UTC)

Hey, Connormah, 707-708 had just finished airing in Canada. Just edited the page to reflect citytv results. Have a good day! Altarep (talk) 01:04, 30 June 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Connormah, how do I place spoilers in articles? Altarep (talk) 00:05, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Taylor Hall
Yeah, Hall's "hometown" is now Kingston, as he moved there at 13, but he was definitely born in Calgary. I've reverted it (again) and added a source. Cheers! Resolute 00:55, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Signature?
Could I ask you to do another signature file? The one for Henry Wadsworth Longfellow is very poor quality, but I think his reproduced signature is fairly easy to find on Google books. There's no rush, but I'd greatly appreciate it! --Midnightdreary (talk) 11:30, 28 June 2010 (UTC)
 * Thank you for your exceptionally fast response on this... It makes my humble "no rush" comment a bit silly... ;) --Midnightdreary (talk) 21:56, 28 June 2010 (UTC)

Probert
This is all I have for the moment. It's not sufficient: we need to wait until it's published. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:22, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * OK, now there's this. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:25, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * This is sufficiently reliable, IMO. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:29, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The Windsor Star headline now reads "Former Detroit Red Wing Bob Probert dies after collapsing in boat: OPP". -- Rrburke (talk) 21:33, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * The TSN story has also been updated. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:35, 5 July 2010 (UTC)
 * There's an RPP that should probably stay in place: probably better to keep the editing to established users. It's also a possible vandalism target. -- Rrburke (talk) 21:41, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:GMPlacelogo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:GMPlacelogo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:49, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

RFA Thank spam
On a personal note, I will work on the maturity and spelling issues ;)-- White Shadows There goes another day 16:39, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem, you've come a very long way. I truly hated to oppose, (I was pondering to switch to neutral) I apologize if I sounded harsh in any way, please don't take it personally. I look forward to supporting in the future.  Connormah  ( talk  &#124;  contribs )  20:18, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problems what so ever. I look forward to earning your support :)-- White Shadows There goes another day 20:24, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Dan Tencer.jpg notice
Hi, I nominated the file for deletion again because you didn't provide evidence of permission since you added the OTRS pending template, which was in the middle of March. Regards 18:02, 7 July 2010 (UTC)

Well...
I had a good look through all your logs, deleted edits and whatnot. The only thing I saw that's likely to attract you any significant opposition is your lack of recognised content work (FA, GA, FL, DYK...). However, a look through your recent edits, both deleted and live makes me think you know what you're doing well enough to do a good job as an admin. If you feel you're ready, then I'd be more than happy to nominate you (or co-nom if you already have a nominator in mind). :) HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:43, 7 July 2010 (UTC)  HJ Mitchell would like to nominate you to become an administrator. Please visit Requests for adminship to see what this process entails, and then [ contact HJ Mitchell] to accept or decline the nomination. A page  for your nomination at Requests for adminship/Connormah 2. If you accept the nomination, you must state and sign your acceptance. You may also choose to make a statement and/or answer the optional questions to supplement the information your nominator has given. Once you are satisfied with the page, you may post your nomination for discussion, or request that your nominator do so.
 * OK, it's blue! I'll add my nomination statement when you've answered the questions, but don;t rush. :) HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   20:58, 7 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I spent a few hours deciding what I was going to say and pulling up all your logs and stats and just added my first draft. Let me know if there's anything I've omitted. Feel free to transclude it when you're ready (but don't feel like I'm rushing you!) or I can do it for you if you'd rather blame me for any cock-ups! :) HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   19:31, 8 July 2010 (UTC)
 * No problem. Thanks.  Connormah  ( talk  &#124;  contribs )  19:39, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

--23:13, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * You might like to add the "for the minute" qualifier to your comment on the delete button- you never know where you might end up working, but caution is good to see. HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   23:22, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Re: Bronislaw Komorowski Image
I had received 2 photos by email from the Candidate Committee (after request), then I sent a long explanation of licensing and needed agreement from copyright holder. I was waiting for an OTRS agreement, but without result. Because it's an important photo, a I called to press office of Candidate Committee for 5 times, where I've received answer that press office knows the case and had passed on higher (to more prior person), but it's still not settled down. After fifth call I've lost my hope, and I'm waiting for lucky agreement or file deletion. I want to mention that I've settled photos from 5 other candidates with agreements. JDavid (talk) 09:06, 8 July 2010 (UTC)

Did you notice...
...that the PAA has taken to watermarking its images? What do you want to bet that that's our fault? Steve Smith (talk) 14:42, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I've noticed. Probably our fault too. I've had success at WP:GL/PHOTO at removing watermarks, but it's not always easy.  Connormah  ( talk  &#124;  contribs )  14:44, 9 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Never got a response; I assume that this watermarking is their response. Honestly, I don't know why they don't just require website users to agree to terms of use prohibiting the download of their images, but I suppose I may be entering WP:BEANS territory here. Steve Smith (talk) 14:48, 9 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Microsoft Outlook Icon.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Microsoft Outlook Icon.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:49, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Microsoft Excel Icon.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Microsoft Excel Icon.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. J Milburn (talk) 12:50, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

RFA Comment
Your edits to your original answer to Q10 are a little confusing as they now stand. Perhaps you could make it clear you edited your answer in response to MC10's response. I know you said so down in the discussion area, but someone reading Q10 first (which they would, starting from the top of the page) wouldn't know that until (and unless) they read the discussion section. Normally, of course, a strikeout would convey the idea of a later edit, but I don't think there's anything to strike out here. Perhaps an italicized note somewhere, or even a response to MC10's response saying something like "you're right; clarified above" with a diff would do the trick? Otherwise, it makes the response seem a little off, when in reality it was quite generous toward your candidacy; there was no requirement to put a suitable spin on the wording you inadvertently placed originally. Frank |  talk  14:22, 10 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Apologies, I was typing too fast when I answered, I'm thankful MC10 pointed that out, I did mean to answer that way. I'll, however, note it.  Connormah  ( talk  &#124;  contribs )  15:51, 10 July 2010 (UTC)

Late RfA Co-Nomination
You have my full support, the other users in my opinion are being biased, and bluntly, lemmings if they can't elaborate as to why they should oppose your adminship. Nonetheless good luck mate!  Fridae'§Doom &#124;  Talk to me  07:10, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Nathaniel Fillmore
I have nominated Nathaniel Fillmore, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Nathaniel Fillmore. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message.  Sandstein  09:32, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:University of Toronto Coat of Arms.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:University of Toronto Coat of Arms.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:19, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Nomination for deletion of Template:Connormah SVG Logo
Template:Connormah SVG Logo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 19:19, 16 July 2010 (UTC)

Your RfA
Hi Connormah. I'm sorry to inform you I've closed your RfA as no consensus. It was a borderline case, so I encourage you to take note of the opposition, continue editing as you have been, and consider standing again in a few months. If you have any questions, please contact me. Best of luck. — Anonymous Dissident  Talk 11:07, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Definitely borderline, I think AD could have closed it either way; my RFA was 94-24-3 and passed, so that's how close you were. Give it 3 or 4 months and then try again, and gee whiz be more careful about those questions next time.--Wehwalt (talk) 11:14, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I can't say I'm not disappointed, but the closure was a fair one as it was in the discretion zone. The concerns of the opposition are generally resolvable, so you should pass if you try again in a few months. CT Cooper · &#32;talk 11:31, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * As one of your supporters may I also offer my condolences; needless to say, this was a very close Rfa indeed. Normally I'd suggest a six month wait - but like the closing 'crat, as well as Wehwalt and CT Cooper, I think you should consider trying again sooner than that, perhaps as quickly as mid-fall if you have taken on the issues your opposers have raised and you feel confident you have addessed them.  Above all do not be discouraged!  You had considerable support, so take comfort in the endorsement of a substantial majority of the !voting community.  With best wishes, Jusdafax   13:29, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I think you'll make it easily next time, if you take this two-cent advice: look over what the voters wanted, decide what you do and don't want to do, and talk about it openly ... now would be a good time since people will be wandering by your talk page with encouragement and condolences. For instance, if you're sure you never want to do CSD, say that, and see if people are cool with that ... they might be, or they might say "well, at least we'd like for you to demonstrate that you know how to A10 BLP violations" or something.  Best of luck. - Dank (push to talk) 14:21, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Just one of those wanderers with words of encouragement. It was close, very close, and shouldnt be too hard to address the oppositions concerns, Hope to see you run once again soon as mentioned above.Ottawa4ever (talk) 15:09, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Thanks guys. I'll try again in a couple months after having addressed some concerns (BLP, sourcing mostly). I would, though, like to maintain my Wikignome editing style, as I said previously, content building is just not a strength, and I don't feel that comfortable doing so. I will also maintain my disinterest in participating at AfD and CSD, but as Dank stated above, I would be able to delete the obvious attack page if it comes by me. Hopefully it works out next time, I was really hoping to get the extra bit and help out in the areas I listed, but, I guess there's always next time.  Connormah  talk 15:28, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

I think you're the latest victim of BLP madness and it was so close that I'm sure half the b'crats would have closed it as successful. In any case, you'll make it next time especially if you take the time to reference the articles which sunk your RfA. I simply hope you won't be bitter about the rejection. Best, Pichpich (talk) 15:34, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Well I expressed my own feeling on the matter in the RfA, perhaps more strongly than was absolutely necessary. Keep up the good work you do, source those BLPs (if some turn out to be unsourceable and you decide you want them gone, let me know and I'll zap them) then start thinking abut #3 in September. If you wanted me to nominate again, I'd be honoured, but either way, I'll do everything I can to help you through. My talk page is always open if you need anything. Best, HJ Mitchell  &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?   16:13, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Hi,commiserations from me too. That has to of been the closest RFA I can remember. I'm sure as long as you continue for another three months you'll be fine next time.  Ϣere  Spiel  Chequers  22:17, 17 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Ha, you should have seen Kww 3, it went to a crat chat and the crats could not agree so it failed.--Wehwalt (talk) 22:41, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I'll agree with the above. Close, correctable, and I feel a group of editors were trying to make a point and you got in the middle of it.  Hobit (talk) 01:51, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Condolences, but on the plus side the rationales on the Oppose side look readily correctable. Look forward to your next RfA. Barring any catastrophes I'll be supporting you again. Throwaway85 (talk) 02:57, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


 * Just some random comments from someone who watched the circus (I really thought the format of the RFA itself got a bit nuts) from beginning to end and didn't have the heart to vote oppose (I nearly did at the end) - take from this what you will:


 * Try not to overcomplicate things; if you not sure of a question TELL THE TRUTH - don't guess! People just want to know if they can trust you to correct your own mistakes i.e. if you accidently screw up will you be mature about it and admit you were wrong rather then repeating the same mistake over and over, or worse - wheel warring. Policies change constantly, especially CSD. For example, in your last RFA when someone asked you the A7 questions you basically tanked it, you basically did the same with the block questions this time - it indicates to people that you won't even take the time to read the policy before using the tool. Remember, there are over 1000 admins, if you ever are unsure of something or used your tools that are borderline on the policies they need to be confident that you will ask for help rather then someone looking finding a year later that you indef blocked a IP for example. Never badger the oppose voters - it takes enough time for some people just to decide to vote; if you really feel the need to comment make sure you are mature and polite and all that, after all they might have went and reviewed your edits and such, and that's thier time they spent. Again, this is sort of what people mean when they say it's "no big deal". RN 05:20, 18 July 2010 (UTC)


 * I commented last week on my talk page that I would be willing to nominate in around 4-6 months if your work continued to stay at a high quality. The offer still stands, so feel free to poke me near the end of the year if you want me to take a look. <b style="color:navy;">NW</b> ( Talk ) 15:53, 19 July 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sabres Alternate Logo.svg
 Thanks for uploading File:Sabres Alternate Logo.svg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:52, 17 July 2010 (UTC)

Request
Any chance you could clean up File:Statueskeleton.png for me, and also get rid of the text at the bottom? I'm having trouble with it. Many thanks. As you can see, Statue of Liberty is the current project.--Wehwalt (talk) 14:03, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Sure, I'll be on it.  Connormah  talk 17:44, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * I did the best I could, here you go! Cheers.  Connormah  talk 19:27, 18 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Many thanks. Can you crop the text?  It does no good, as a screen is not to scale!--Wehwalt (talk) 20:21, 18 July 2010 (UTC)

Email
Thanks for your email, I have left you a reply. Cheers, Big  Dom  18:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Fixed it at the same time, yours showed up, sorry...
--Chris (クリス • フィッチ) (talk) 19:09, 20 July 2010 (UTC)

Photos
I doubt you'll find anything of Morrow, since his rise to prominence was awfully close to that "first published before 1923" threshold. Seems like I found one of John L. Helm once, but I don't remember where. I'll save it if I find it again.

By the way, the one you uploaded of Goebel apparently didn't pass muster for someone. It got questioned at my FA nom of Kentucky gubernatorial election, 1899. It's also included in William O'Connell Bradley, which I hope to take to FAC soon, so if you can see if you could address the concerns, I'd appreciate it. Otherwise, I'll have to change the Goebel image in the Bradley article. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 13:41, 21 July 2010 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I was fortunate to find the Taylor image, and like you, had looked for quite some time. Not sure how that particular book eluded me during all my work on the Goebel article years ago. I don't think either of the two for Morrow would suffice as portraits, but it's possible they could fit into the article somewhere. If the watermark can be removed from the Morehead image, it should replace the current one, as the author and date of creation are listed as unknown. Acdixon (talk • contribs • count) 18:17, 21 July 2010 (UTC)

Long names
Hi, it's been common practice to use the long names for Canadian politicians. As you will see, the overwhelming majority of Canadian politicians have their full names in the infobox. I'm trying to keep things consistent among Canadian politicians, and this is not the case now. Either fix all 1000 politicians, or revert my edits back, for consistency. :P -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:58, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
 * It's still not consistent among Prime Ministers. For example, Paul Martin, Pierre Trudeau and John Diefenbaker all still have their long names or in the case of Trudeau, a longer name than the article title. -- Earl Andrew - talk 00:37, 24 July 2010 (UTC)

Golden Team
Thank you for your input on the matter, I'm aware the article is now in the public domain. With all due sincerity as far as the article is concerned, outside editors "need" to read 3 books to fully cite the article, which I have tried to eloquently to put to light. I want to fully finish and conclude the article and then I will have no qualms about other editors weaving their sublimating editorial magic over it. But for them to do that, I hold that they read 3 books which I have done. The article is 75% concluded, and I'm awaiting the arrival of a hardcopy 4th book from Amazon.com to shed new light on the topical subject matter -- as I've always extracted my information from valid legitimate sources. Thank you for you attention. -- talk —Preceding undated comment added 08:02, 25 July 2010 (UTC).
 * Thank you for the response, and I understand your concerns, but please be aware of the tag that the article has on top - it's quite clear that the article has multiple style issues. I see you've mentioned taking care of the inline citations, but please know that the tone that the article is written in may not be appropriate for Wikipedia - it should just state facts, and be written from a neutral point of view. Some editors (including myself) have taken some time to copyedit the article to have it conform with Wikipedia's basic style guidelines, which just requires basic rewording (no new facts/removal of facts). Thank you for your contributions, but, in the future, please don't drive away editors who try to improve the article with saying things like "please stop editing the article immediately", and so on. Thanks. Also, please take the time to sign your posts on talk pages by typing 4 tildes after what you write ~ . It really helps in the sense that we know whose comment it is, and the time it was left. Thanks again.  Connormah  talk 15:15, 25 July 2010 (UTC)