User talk:Connorsworld2011

Do not add fake information

December 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Lyrick Studios has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Lyrick Studios was changed by Connorsworld2011 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85855 on 2013-12-21T01:37:26+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:37, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lyrick Studios, you may be blocked from editing. ''And please stop removing warning notices. '' RolandR (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ragdoll Productions, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —Mono·nomic 01:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ragdoll Productions, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. RolandR (talk) 01:54, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Someguy1221 (talk) 02:00, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Unfairly blocked
I agreed that the used method and edit war was not correct but in fact his edits were correct. I have checked a number of the links that Connorsworld2011 removed and none of them had the slightest mention of Ragdoll Productions.

So Connorsworld2011 was not committing vandalism. His indefinite block should be lifted and changed in a temporary one for editwarring.

Could a administrator, preferrably Someguy1221, take a look at this? The Banner talk 02:34, 21 December 2013 (UTC)


 * This block was based not just on his edits under this account, but similar activity under his IP address, . If he wants to be unblocked, he'll have to express an intent to edit within policy. Someguy1221 (talk) 05:26, 21 December 2013 (UTC)