User talk:Conorcool2021

Conorcool2021, you are invited to the Teahouse!
I'll be there Conorcool2021 (talk) 05:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

March 2021
Your recent editing history at Everett Ruess shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing&mdash;especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring&mdash;even if you do not violate the three-revert rule&mdash;should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.  General Ization Talk  04:44, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Everett Ruess, you may be blocked from editing.  General Ization Talk  04:56, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
 * If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Everett Ruess. Uses x (talk • contribs) 05:09, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, as you did at Disappearance of Alice Corbett, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people.  General Ization Talk  05:18, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 *  is unacceptable anywhere in Wikipedia, and especially in the body of an article. At this point, you are on the verge of being blocked for blatent vandalism.  General Ization  Talk  05:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring. Thank you.  General Ization Talk  05:10, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Blocked
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Paul Erik (talk) (contribs) 05:19, 28 March 2021 (UTC)
 * Blocked for this edit among others. Paul Erik  (talk) (contribs) 05:20, 28 March 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
<span style="font-family: Gill Sans MT, Arial, Helvetica; font-weight:140;"> General Ization <i style="color: #000666;">Talk </i> 03:50, 22 June 2021 (UTC)