User talk:Conquistador2k6/archive 18

Happy New Year, Conquistador2k6!


Happy New Year! Conquistador2k6, Have a prosperous, productive and enjoyable New Year, and thanks for your contributions to Wikipedia. See this for background context.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 22:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Send New Year cheer by adding {{subst:Happy New Year fireworks}} to user talk pages.

— Moops  ⋠ T ⋡ 22:31, 3 January 2023 (UTC)

Matt Wilson
Not gonna lie, I thought this edit summary was aimed at me, and for brief minute I was left wondering what the heck was wrong with the info I added. - JuneGloom07 Talk  16:22, 10 April 2023 (UTC)


 * Nah, that was for the IP dum-dum who has form for it and there's like 2000 idiots out there or at least the same Moron who changes his/her IP.
 * Sorry if it gave the wrong impression. I just get tired of stupid, pointless vandalism. Joke is the person hasn't even been on since last summer (in that guise anyway)
 * While I have you, Do you have anything for either 1989 or 1993 on the Neighbours front? Conquistador2k6 (talk) 18:42, 10 April 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 28
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Jai Sharma, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Arthur Thomas.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 28 July 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of List of Hollyoaks characters (1997) for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Hollyoaks characters (1997) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/List of Hollyoaks characters (1997) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:09, 9 September 2023 (UTC)

Soaps improvement drive
Hello, I pinged you on the WP:SOAPS talk page about this so sorry to double on the message but I want to get as many on-board for this as it's ambitious, even for me. Due to the recent surge in scrutiny on soap articles, we all need to come together and improve soap articles, so I've created an improvement drive with dates and articles for the soap WikiProject to focus on improving articles each week. Right now, it's focused on Hollyoaks, but the plan is to keep it going until we get to each soap. I did not include a section to sign up as I didn't want editors to feel that they are signing their life away and are expected to edit the articles mercilessly. I hope for some level of dedication but it's not a drive with huge pressure. Are you interested in joining in? – Meena • 11:39, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
 Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Martin
Hey. Help me as I am now confused. In this edit you split the sections and changed a quote. In the reformatted quote, a new TV Week source has appeared for the quote? That's my confusion. The only explanation I can think of is that you copied the quote box from Frank Morgan (Home and Away) and left the source behind? I think it has been fine not split into sections for ten years. I have found more information to further expand this - which is why I started tidying it earlier. :( Rain the 1 20:47, 22 December 2023 (UTC)


 * Bit sloppy of me, Soz.
 * I just feel that splitting devs is the way to go to make the articles look a bit less unwieldy. Conquistador2k6 (talk) 20:51, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * No worries. I know you like splitting them but sometimes there isn't enough information. Would it be okay if we wait until I add more information to the article on this occasion?Rain the 1 20:59, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * That's cool by me. Conquistador2k6 (talk) 21:01, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
 * Thank you!Rain the 1</b> 21:54, 22 December 2023 (UTC)