User talk:Consasia

Commercial use of Image:1143412116 l.jpg
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:1143412116 l.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:1143412116 l.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license GFDL-self to license it under the GFDL, or cc-by-sa-2.5 to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use PD-self to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:1143412116 l.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 22:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Duplicate images uploaded
Thanks for uploading Image:Josh Berresford 1.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:1143412116 l.jpg. The copy called Image:1143412116 l.jpg has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 22:32, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Josh_Berresford_1.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Josh_Berresford_1.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.  howcheng  {chat} 23:07, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Josh Berresford 5.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Josh Berresford 5.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. tiZom(2¢) 03:14, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Josh Berresford 4.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Josh Berresford 4.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. tiZom(2¢) 03:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Josh Berresford 3.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Josh Berresford 3.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. tiZom(2¢) 03:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Possibly unfree Image:Josh Berresford 2.jpg
An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Josh Berresford 2.jpg, has been listed at Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. tiZom(2¢) 03:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with Image:1545095803_l.jpg
Thanks for uploading Image:1545095803_l.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:
 * Image use policy
 * Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Media copyright questions. 05:39, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

Reads Like a press release
The entry for Josh Berresford reads like a press release instead of a factual entry. It needs citatations and heavy clean up. Stick to the facts and stay away from personal likes and dislikes. If you don't clean up the entry, someone else will and it may end up being removed.

Griff (talk) 09:08, 3 September 2008 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Sanctified and Chicken-Fried


The article Sanctified and Chicken-Fried has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * Non-notable, publication. Unsourced too.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. De728631 (talk) 20:25, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Mister Weed-Eater, The Movie


The article Mister Weed-Eater, The Movie has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * WP:CRYSTAL, WP:NFF: Future films are generally not notable until production is well under way.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing  will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 20:40, 29 September 2009 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Mister Weed-Eater, The Movie
I have nominated Mister Weed-Eater, The Movie, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Mister Weed-Eater, The Movie. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:49, 30 September 2009 (UTC)

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Hairhorn (talk) 19:58, 4 October 2009 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image (File:Mister weed-eater movie poster.jpg)
 Thanks for uploading File:Mister weed-eater movie poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. A More Perfect Onion (talk) 12:44, 7 October 2009 (UTC)