User talk:ConsciousCopyWriter

Donna Brazile
Your restoring of the content which has been subject violates restrictions present on the article as part of discretionary sanctions for US politics. Specifically:

''Consensus required: All editors must obtain firm consensus on the talk page of this article before reinstating any edits that have been challenged (via reversion). If in doubt, don't make the edit.''

I would appreciate it if you self-reverted.Volunteer Marek (talk) 04:20, 25 July 2016 (UTC)

The content in place does not represent a restoration, especially in light of the fact that your own edits following your deletion of the content I posted materially changed the context of the section. The content that is present is different now, the citations are different (since now the facts cited are being reported further in media) and the content is factually accurate. Rather than continuing to discuss the page and your authority as you appear to do regularly, please substantiate the basis of your challenge to this content. ConsciousCopyWriter (talk) 06:18, 25 July 2016 (UTC)