User talk:Consciousbuyer

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. OhNo itsJamie Talk 13:22, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Primary sources (i.e., the subject's own website) are not considered Reliable sources
Please stop adding content without reliable sources. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. OhNo itsJamie Talk 18:39, 9 September 2012 (UTC)


 * How can I respond to you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Consciousbuyer (talk • contribs) 18:55, 9 September 2012‎ (UTC)


 * You can respond here, or at Talk:Crowd funding. Note there are serious problems with your contributions- they are not backed by verifiable and reliable sources, you are (intentionally or accidentally) attempting to sneak them in with no edit summary and with the minor tag, you haven't discussed their removal and you've done this several times. tedder (talk) 19:57, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012
Thank you for your contributions. Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Crowd funding, as "minor" only if they truly are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes, or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. tedder (talk) 19:54, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Uinvest


The article Uinvest has been proposed for deletion&#32; because of the following concern:
 * No reliable secondary sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. McGeddon (talk) 11:59, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

"Cease and desist notice on this paragraph"
Your recent edits to Brock Pierce could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. --McGeddon (talk) 12:02, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. -- Orange Mike &#x007C;  Talk  12:16, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Uinvest for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Uinvest is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Uinvest until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. McGeddon (talk) 08:49, 7 May 2013 (UTC)