User talk:Consensusbuilder

Welcome!

Hello,, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers: I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~&#126;); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place  on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Hamster Sandwich 04:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page
 * Help pages
 * Tutorial
 * How to write a great article
 * Manual of Style

Greetings new user!
I have no idea if you are going to check this page, but it seems as though you have finally taken the plunge and started an actual account. Congratulations!. Wikipedia is the most important online information resourse project. My own opinion is that is not the most complete at this time, but as more and more is added to it, the better it will become. I usually use WP to stear me toward more complete and tactile reference works. You will find as you make contributions and new edits to the project, and as your user account "matures", you will come into contact with other editors whose opinion you will trust. This brings me to the topic of the post you left on my talk page. And when I read your post, my immeadiate response, before I even went to the history page to see where to send this reply, was "its called 'building a concensus..."! You can imagine my delight when I found that you had chosen your user name to coincide exactly with my thoughts! Quite an excellent irony.

Now if the situation were opposite in this case, and four or five other editors were telling me I was wrong, and I were being blocked because I had disregarded protocol... well, it would never have come to this point with me. If the editors at London, Ontario were telling me well "let Consensusbuilder have his way, we're tired of reverting his changes to the article", I would argue, "but the editor is only pushing his POV concerning this, you can't change the article based on this". And I would be right in thinking this and pointing it out to any responsible wikipedian. I mean in the scheme of things, there is much worse vandalism constantly occuring in WP pages. Horrible, slanderous, foul, obscene even. And the editors and admins and bureaucrats are constantly fighting it. Now your everts aren't any of those things, but they are being construed as vandalism. I mean what you were doing as an anonymous user identity. This is your new WP name and address. Clean slate for you as far as I am concerned. Go out, and do good things. Make positive contributions and additions. Try to learn the "lay of the land" so to speak, and learn the rules. Good luck with your editing career, it is very rewarding to contribute to Wikipedia. See you 'round! Hamster Sandwich 04:20, 23 August 2005 (UTC)