User talk:Conservativeoperative

Welcome!

 * }

February 2011
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Matt Shea has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. I removed the following link(s): http://spokanetwo.files.wordpress.com/2011/02/petitions.pdf. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a petition site then please note that wikipedia is not a soapbox, and that such links generally should not be included. If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 23:42, 21 February 2011 (UTC)

Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Matt Shea. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Corvus cornix talk  00:00, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Matt Shea


The article Matt Shea has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article. &#32; The nominator also raised the following concern:
 * All biographies of living people must be sourced to reliable sources.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners or ask at Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the prod blp tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can when you are ready to add one. Corvus cornix talk  23:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * In addition, please see WP:BLP. Such claims must be sourced to reliable sources.  Court records are not considered reliable sources.   Corvus cornix  talk  23:52, 21 February 2011 (UTC)


 * Corvus seems to have not noticed that one of your references was to a good newspaper, and directly supported the material. I added some more refs, that directly supported the article and removed the prod. However, the edits that you made showed a considerable degree of bias. We just give the information, without editorializing. I would suggest it be best if you did not further edit this particular article.    DGG ( talk ) 04:57, 3 March 2011 (UTC)