User talk:Consort-Plus

Nomination of Devika Singh for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Devika Singh is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Devika Singh until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hell in a Bucket (talk) 16:07, 24 July 2019 (UTC)

Kahiin to Hoga (2019 TV series) moved to draftspace
An article you recently created, Kahiin to Hoga (2019 TV series), does not appear ready to be published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of " " before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. –  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 01:28, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Draftspace
Hi, please don't move articles from draft to article without it first being approved by an WP:AFC reviewer. I've moved Draft:Kahiin to Hoga (2019 TV series) back to a draft.–  Broccoli  &#38; Coffee (Oh hai) 05:13, 1 August 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Ram Siya Ke Lov Kush.jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Ram Siya Ke Lov Kush.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:49, 10 August 2019 (UTC)

Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 16:25, 10 September 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Vish (Colors TV).jpg
Thanks for uploading File:Vish (Colors TV).jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:53, 13 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 15:35, 20 September 2019 (UTC)

Reminder: Community Insights Survey
Share your experience in this survey

Hi ,

There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.

Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.

This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).

Find more information about this project. [mailto:surveys@wikimedia.org Email us] if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.

Sincerely, RMaung (WMF) 20:35, 3 October 2019 (UTC)

October 2019
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 13:17, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Appeal For Unblock

 * For what it's worth, it appears that the editor is being honest about what accounts were being used. SQL Query me!  03:13, 31 October 2019 (UTC)

Can you clarify the reasons for the block? There is no time overlap between the two accounts (before the block Consort-Plus's last edit was on 14 October, and the account "Update once" was created on 23 October), and there is no page which both accounts have edited. Nothing I can see shows any more than a fresh start with a new account, but I am sure there must be more to it than that, as you would not have even carried out a CU, let alone blocked the accounts, without evidence of abuse. I would be grateful if you could give some indication what kind of abuse, rather than just use, of multiple accounts there has been. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 21:39, 2 November 2019 (UTC) — Berean Hunter   (talk)  12:53, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * First, Consort-Plus created Devika Singh (deleted), and Update once created Draft:Devika Singh. Second, there were abusive logged out edits by the user, causing me to block IPs. Indeed, it was the IP editing that triggered the check.--Bbb23 (talk) 22:44, 2 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Not being a CheckUser I can't assess the logged out edits, but I don't understand the relevance of the fact that the editor created the Devika Singh with the old account, and then, after having switched to the new account, created Draft:Devika Singh. Presumably if the two creations had been done using the same account it might be grounds for a G4 speedy deletion and a warning about recreating content removed as a result of a deletion discussion, but not for a block. Doing the same after a switch to another account might warrant a friendly message explaining why doing so without declaring the alternative account was not a good idea, but again not a block. I have to accept that the logged out edits may, as far as I know, justify the block, because the logged in ones certainly don't. Consort-Plus, I hope another CheckUser will come along and assess the unblock request soon, as until that happens you will just have to wait. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 20:35, 3 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Consort-Plus, please see this section of policy, and the first bullet point under #4, "With the permission of the affected user". Do the checkusers have your permission to discuss your IP editing publicly? This would allow or any checkuser to discuss this with JBW and other admins.

hello Berean Hunter sir I am allowe checker users to discuss my IP editing publicly. Because I know that what I have done it's only editing other it is done for dispute editing or disabled accounts creation. So I am with you done what ever you want. Thanks Consort-Plus (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2019 (UTC)

— Berean Hunter   (talk)  18:47, 14 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Pinging to see the above message. JBW (talk) Formerly JamesBWatson 20:47, 10 November 2019 (UTC)
 * , Sampling of edits that are ✅ to this account. Note that the block on Special:Contributions/2409:4064::/34 is because of multiple sockmasters and the disruptive editing is more about the one spamming phone numbers which I have not connected to this account. I'll also echo 's concerns about CIR also.
 * Special:Contributions/2409:4064:2593:E681:AC00:F5BC:30FD:F1BD with block evasion
 * Special:Contributions/2409:4064:712:9B73:5C62:33AC:E05E:31AD
 * Special:AbuseLog/25160027
 * Special:Contributions/2409:4064:2394:8761:DD29:3663:6126:3464
 * Special:DeletedContributions/2409:4064:193:ED4A:8844:CE:C41:FECE
 * Special:Contributions/2409:4064:193:ED4A:8844:CE:C41:FECE
 * Special:Undelete/Draft:Suman_Gupta_(actress)
 * Special:Contributions/2409:4064:205:AA48:0:0:44:80AD
 * Special:Contributions/2409:4064:319:3668:9989:5EDB:1B86:5CDC
 * Special:Undelete/Draft:SUMAN_GUPTA
 * Special:Contributions/2409:4064:319:3668:715E:6403:F55A:6204
 * Special:AbuseLog/25164814
 * These edits
 * Read May 10 report through first June 13 report and 's comments. I cannot see the useragent but the log makes it clear that this is Honorr62.
 * Read May 10 report through first June 13 report and 's comments. I cannot see the useragent but the log makes it clear that this is Honorr62.
 * Read May 10 report through first June 13 report and 's comments. I cannot see the useragent but the log makes it clear that this is Honorr62.

Blanking
You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block, as you did here. Please do not do so again. You are free to make new requests. --Yamla (talk) 11:57, 13 December 2019 (UTC)