User talk:ConspiracyCrazy25

Welcome!
Hello, ConspiracyCrazy25, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful: Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place  before the question. Again, welcome!  Acroterion   (talk)   03:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
 * Getting started
 * Introduction to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

April 2014
Hello, I'm Acroterion. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral to me, so I removed it for now. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you.  Acroterion   (talk)   03:46, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

can you tell me exactly what i did wrong ?


 * Wikipedia isn't a soapbox for commentary on or promotion of conspiracy or fringe theories. You inserted commentary, referring to the Rockefeller and Rothschild families as "gangs", and sourced it to worldtruth.tv, which is not a reliable source, even for fringe theories. You also made statements about Hitler's survival in Wikipedia's voice, which isn't acceptable. You must always attribute such opinions to reliable analysis, rather than expounding in Wikipedia's voice, portraying fringe ideas as truth.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

What do you consider to be a reliable source? Also if further research is done there are many reliable sources that point to the same theory as stated on worldtruth.tv


 * See Wikipedia policy on reliable sources and verifiability. In general, you want to aim at scholarly texts and publications with editorial oversight. You can certainly state (with appropriate regard for biographies of living persons policy) similar concepts if you can back them with appropriate sourcing. However, you must strictly avoid commentary. Your edits were moving into soapboxing territory, rather than the neutral description demanded by Wikipedia policy.  Acroterion   (talk)   04:19, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Please understand i am not trying to come out wrong, i am trying to understand exactly what you mean.But how would you concider a website that has no Alexa ranking to be a credible source? They used their link here: http://www.blackraiser.com/nredoubt/ on 'Death of Adolf Hitler conspiracy theories' page... They aren't even ranker and you guys used them as a source. Please explain.


 * Alexa rankings have nothing to do with reliable sourcing: after all, medical journals that meet the very tough sourcing requirements of WP:MEDRS are very lightly trafficked. That said, the blackraiser.com site isn't looking too good either, someone must have added that without understanding sourcing requirements: Wikipedia isn't meant to refer to everything someone with a website on the Internet may have speculated about, it's meant to cover subjects that have received significant coverage in secondary sources, such as books, and media outlets with editorial oversight. That makes Wikipedia (and all encyclopedias) s tertiary source. Internet speculation should have been covered in some depth in a secondary source. Please feel free to remove the dubious reference and provide a better one, or to remove the material referenced by that link entirely if it's not supportable.  Acroterion   (talk)   13:04, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

If i want to edit one of wikipedia pages, can i send you an email asking for permission ? This way i dont get banned.
 * You don't need my permission (or anyone's) to edit, you just need consensus so the edit will stay. If you think an edit is controversial, or you're just not sure, you should bring up the question or proposed edit on the article's talkpage.  Acroterion   (talk)   01:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi

DO you know why the link i put on wikipedia says (ignored) about Hitler conspiracy and it says this next to the link i put up: Text "worldtruth.tv" ignored (help).... Do you know why the website has been ignored? Did i make a mistake editing it? Here is the link... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_of_Adolf_Hitler_conspiracy_theories#cite_note-3
 * It's a technical formatting issue within the reference, not something that relates to that website: see Help:CS1_errors. I'll see if I can fix it.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:19, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
 * I've fixed the reference, and you've put the speculation in the proper tone.  Acroterion   (talk)   16:22, 20 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much