User talk:Conspiracy Smasher

Debunked 9/11 conspiracy theories
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Debunked 9/11 conspiracy theories, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the  notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add db-author to the top of Debunked 9/11 conspiracy theories. KurtRaschke (talk) 04:16, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

December 2007
Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. Please remember to observe our core policies.  User  Doe ☻T☼C 04:26, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox.  User  Doe ☻T☼C 04:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Neutrality issue
According to your contributions to Wikipedia, you are running an agenda promoting your point of view on Wikipedia; which breaks WP:NPOV. Please see WP:NPOV. I'll leave you the welcome message with a few helpful links. Regards  User  Doe ☻T☼C 04:35, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Re: 9/11
You may think that this is the case. Others might see it different. Wikipedia has a strict policy to keep articles free from opinions. We do not try to create opinions. Wikipedia is also not the place for users to promote their own point of view. We have to be neutral. I hope the links I just left you will help you :-). Happy editing  User  Doe ☻T☼C 04:41, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by adding commentary and your personal analysis into articles, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ridernyc (talk) 04:48, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

‹ The template below is being considered for deletion. See templates for deletion to help reach a consensus. › Please stop. Wikipedia is not censored. Any further changes which have the effect of censoring an article will be regarded as vandalism. If you continue in this manner, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Please do not continue (trying to get material deleted which you disagree with)  User  Doe ☻T☼C 04:49, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Disruption
Since from your edits it is now clear that your purpose here is not to write an encyclopaedia but to disrupt and to provoke on a contentious issue, I have revoked your editing privileges indefinitely. Uncle G (talk) 05:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)