User talk:Constantinaki

Welcome!
Hello, Constantinaki, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 22:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)

September 2015
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=680900019 your edit] to Corpus callosum may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [ edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20&section=new my operator's talk page].
 * List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:50, 13 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Theofanopoulou |first1=Constantna |journal=Frontiers in Psychology |volume=6 |issue=1355}}

Encylopedias should not select hypotheses
As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia should not single out scientific hypotheses that the appropriate fields have not weighed. This is best done by looking at review articles that assess the consensus. "Trends in" and "Frontiers" journals are where ideas are launched, not settled. While they might offer overviews that are useful for Wikipedia, their conclusions are usually to premature. Additionally, Wikipedia is not a forum for promoting an individual's ideas. Your username suggests a connection to the paper you added to several articles.BiologicalMe (talk) 16:07, 22 September 2015 (UTC)