User talk:Constantinpro

November 2013
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice:. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. HJ Mitchell &#124;  Penny for your thoughts?  14:50, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Okay Constantinpro, here's how it works. First up, as I said above, do not recreate the article again. It's been deleted several times; if you carry on sticking it indiscriminately into article space, you're going to get blocked again. Instead, work on the draft at User:Constantinpro/Sparx (video game) to address the following issues: I'm going to go over to your draft now and add some notes to help point you in the right direction. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  15:32, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
 * Neutrality. Wikipedia has to be written in a neutral tone.
 * Notability. It looks as though Sparx has probably received enough coverage to pass the basic requirement for inclusion, but that needs to be demonstrated in the article.
 * Verifiability. If you say something like, "The video game, however, helped more kids recover from their depression" then you need to cite the study that proves that fact, right after saying it.

Speedy deletion nomination of Sparx video game


A tag has been placed on Sparx video game requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Oddbodz  - (  Talk  ) (  Contribs  ) 09:42, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Sparx video game


A tag has been placed on Sparx video game, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 11:05, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Last chance
I gave you the benefit of the doubt when I unblocked you, provided you with notes on your draft to help you improve it, and warned you against recreating the article without addressing the issues raised. Today you have shunted the page - unaltered - back into article mainspace again. I have deleted it; understand that if you recreate the page again in that way you will be blocked indefinitely. Here is your draft, with notes on how to improve it. At the top of the page is a box which says, "Finished? Submit the page!" When and only when you have dealt with the numerous problems with the draft, and have removed my comments, you may press that submit button (which will send the article for review) - you can also, if you wish, ask me or another established editor to review the page for you.

Again, I can't stress this enough: if you create the page again in its current format, you can expect to be blocked again - hell, I'll do it myself. We are here to help, but we won't tolerate damage to the encyclopedia. Yunshui 雲 &zwj; 水  13:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Sparx.org.nz logo.png
 Thanks for uploading File:Sparx.org.nz logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:48, 4 June 2017 (UTC)