User talk:Constitutional1787

February 2010
Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Mark Weisbrot, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.
 * Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Mark Weisbrot was changed by Constitutional1787 (u) (t) deleting 13978 characters on 2010-02-10T22:09:04+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 22:09, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Sandy Georgia (Talk) 22:28, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely to prevent further disruption caused by your engagement in an edit war. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Floquenbeam (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC) 5 edits, all reverts to the same version... Theoretically this should be a 24 hour edit warring block, but you clearly aren't here to edit collaboratively, and since that's what we do here... Also, the fairly obvious sockpuppetry sealed the deal. --Floquenbeam (talk) 23:47, 10 February 2010 (UTC)

Block notice
__NOINDEX__

You were blocked indefinitely on 11 Feb 2010 by user:NuclearWarfare for supposed sockpuppeting (being a sock of user:Scalabrineformvp). If you wish to appeal this block, please follow the instructions above. Rd232 talk 12:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)