User talk:Consultanttothelion

Speedy deletion of Shared preferences
A tag has been placed on Shared preferences, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 02:53, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

it is difficult to embrace Wiki when the eyes want to step on my learning curve in step.
it is difficult to embrace Wiki when the eyes want to step on my learning curve in step.


 * Have you ever considered using the Sandbox for trying out edits? Wikipedia is not a repository for word definitions. That's Wiktionary's remit. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 03:17, 10 September 2008 (UTC)

September 2008
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself. Please use the template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Arbiteroftruth (talk) 03:16, 10 September 2008 (UTC)