User talk:Consultright

TfD nomination of Template:Infobox JPM
Template:Infobox JPM has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you.  C h a m a l  talk 14:34, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Template:Infobox JPM
Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the article or have a copy emailed to you. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 16:32, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Blocked
This account has been indefinitely blocked because it is being used as a means of promoting a company or organization. This is contrary to our policies.  AK Radecki Speaketh  01:22, 2 February 2009 (UTC)

advice
As an administrator interested in this topic, I recognize that these are in fact significant journals (at least most of them are) from a significnt established specialized publisher. The articles are inmost respects suitable for Wikipedia, and similar to our other journal articles. I do not consider them spam, and I consider the block an over-reaction. I shall see about restoring the articles, even if I have to rewrite them. (The only respect,actually, in which they do not meet our standards is that we do not list ll of the editorial board, just the editor in chief.). However, your name, and particular your signature,does in fact not meet our user guidelines, because it appears to be a corporate name. Feel free to take another name and edit--but edit within the Wikipedia guidelines in our Business FAQ What this means in practice, is that you should let other people work on these articles,and suggest changes on the talk pages. Please contact me for further assistance if you need it. DGG (talk) 01:47, 2 February 2009 (UTC)