User talk:Contact cascade

Hi,

Thanks for your additions to Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, however adding your personal opinions or research to Wikipedia is not permitted. If you have verifiable cites from reputable places that backs up your comments then please add them. But please note that as an encyclopaedia, Wikipedia must at all times report events neutrally without bias. Thanks. -- Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:29, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

May 2008
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Escape Orbit (Talk) 22:45, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. A Vand talkcontribs 22:46, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Blocked for edit warring at Royal Society for the Protection of Birds
in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text below. Per a report at WP:AN/3RR. EdJohnston (talk) 04:08, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Editor assistance request
Hi, I have replied to your message at Editor assistance/Requests. -- Beloved Freak  15:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

Talkback
ukexpat (talk) 21:55, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Bank hall
Hi, I was indeed unaware. Can you find a ref for the opposition to development plans and we could include "which are not universally popular in the area" or similar in the landmarks section. I an keen to remain neutral in this.--J3Mrs (talk) 14:05, 28 November 2010 (UTC)