User talk:Contebragheonte

Libro d'oro
If you are concerned about the information in any Wikipedia article, I suggest you mention it here, rather then edit warring on the page concerned. Giacomo Returned 14:07, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

May 2011
Do not add personal information about other contributors to Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Annuario della Nobiltà Italiana. Wikipedia operates on the principle that every contributor has the right to remain completely anonymous. Posting personal information about a user is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's harassment policy. Wikipedia policy on this issue is strictly enforced and your edits have been reverted or removed, not least because such information can appear on web searches. Wikipedia's privacy policy is there to protect the privacy of every user, including you. Persistently adding personal information about other contributors may result in you being blocked from editing. ''A number of your edits to the page appear to be trying to link the identity of another editor (User:Larastabata) with the real name of a person that may or may not be them. Please stop posting this material into the talk page.'' --Demiurge1000 (talk) 21:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * even though he is running socks to post against you . Giacomo Returned 21:20, 11 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Sorry, but I haven't added any personal information about anyone, i.e. I didn't have put any name related to any users but I only called the people by their public nicknames. If you referring to (redacted) this is only a nickname used by Larastabata as sockpuppet on Italian wikipedia.
 * Please see the link:
 * http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Categoria:Wikipedia:Cloni_sospetti_di_Orazio_e_Clarabella
 * http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Pirillo
 * http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Ninni_Svampa
 * http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Utenti_problematici/Antonio_Gargiulo
 * After a long work as troll this user, identified as a troll in the Italian WP, as requested, have received the anonymization by the administrators: however, as he insists to associate names and users do not think it's fair to silence what has already happened in Italy. In Italy he had vandalized the same articles: see the history in italian WP:
 * http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Annuario_della_nobilt%C3%A0_italiana&offset=20100801015604&action=history
 * http://it.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Libro_d%27oro_della_nobilt%C3%A0_italiana_(periodico)&action=history et caetera
 * Actually as the user --Ersormarchese/Larastabata write that Torean-capricorn is the publisher of the Annuario (?!).
 * I think it's fair to say that the Ersormarchese, or the user 109 ....... or Larastabata, as you prefer, that modify pages is already expelled out countless times from Italian wikipedia.
 * Instead is just Larastabata that link other pages during the tentative to associate some persons to authors of some posts in the discussion.
 * Anyway I'm tired about this situation and I think that this will be my last edit on WP.
 * Thank you very much. --Contebragheonte (talk) 23:08, 11 May 2011 (UTC)
 * I have redacted the name again, because there is a plausible claim that it is someone's real name, and that that person might not want their real name associated with accusations of misbehaviour on Wikipedia. Please avoid using that "nickname". Using the username the user is registered at, should be quite sufficient for purposes of discussion. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 23:19, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Blocked
I have blocked you for 3 months for operating multiple accounts in an abusive way by editing Talk:Annuario della Nobiltà Italiana with two different accounts,, the other one being User:A curious reader. You know better than that, given your posts about another user doing the same thing. If, after 3 months, you can return to editing without importing your battles from the Italian Wikipedia or breaking any other rules, you can remain here; however, your edits will be watched, and if you start another account in the interim you will be blocked indefinitely.

If you wish to question this block you may use the template; however, reviewing administrators should be aware this is a checkuser block. Risker (talk) 03:39, 16 May 2011 (UTC)