User talk:Conthalian

I've added the "prod" template to the article Conthalian, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also What Wikipedia is not and Importance). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree, discuss the issues raised at Talk:Conthalian. If you remove the dated prod template, the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. --Zoz (t) 13:22, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

The Conthalian article lacks sources. As it doesn't get any google hits either, I have a reason to believe it's a hoax. If it's "widely popular among people of this part of the world", then surely you can add some sources to prove that claim. I'm nominating the article for deletion under the Articles for deletion process. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Articles for deletion/Conthalian. Don't forget to add four tildes ( ~ ) at the end of each of your comments to sign them. You are free to edit the content of Conthalian during the discussion, but please do not remove the "Articles for Deletion" template (the box at the top). Doing so will not end the discussion. --Zoz (t) 17:52, 22 June 2006 (UTC)