User talk:ContinueWithCaution/Archives/%(13UTCpmSun, 10 Nov 2013 21:23:16 +0000)10/%(11201311300911pm11UTC)16

The Signpost: 02 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 02:44, 6 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 09 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 15:06, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 16 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:43, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 23 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 03:59, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of Pennsylvania
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article University of Pennsylvania you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- 20:30, 29 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Sorry to bump this one back so quickly, but at a bare minimum, you'll need to resolve the tagged issues on the page before nominating this one for GA again. You may also wish to open a discussion at the article's talk page to engage the regular editors there about whether they feel the article is ready for nomination. Good luck! I hope you do stick with this one and bring it to GA; it'd net you at the very least a Half Million Award. Cheers, Khazar2 (talk) 20:35, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of University of Pennsylvania
The article University of Pennsylvania you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:University of Pennsylvania for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Khazar2 -- 20:42, 29 October 2013 (UTC)

Beauty
Hi, CWC. Thanks for reverting this edit by Nightmareishere so quickly. It was a very bad edit, and it's no thanks to them that they didn't know how to code an image, so I've given them a sterner warning. Please let me know if you happen to see them doing something abusive again. (Love the friendly gull on your userpage!) Bishonen &#124; talk 17:25, 30 October 2013 (UTC).
 * Okay, thanks! C(u)w(t)C(c) 17:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Terence Magee's edits on Tiger (Fleetway)
Just leaving a note to protest at the vandalism warning you left Terencemagee regarding his edits at Tiger. Terence's edits seem to be original research (he says here that he used to work in British comics, and his edits appear to be based on his own experience), but they are clearly in good faith and don't deserve to be called vandalism. Unfortunately an awful lot of what went on behind the scenes in British comics is undocumented in reliable secondary sources. I have asked him to contribute to the UK Comics Wiki, where first-hand experience is more than welcome. --Nicknack009 (talk) 17:48, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Thanks for pointing that out to me. This reversion was actually a mistake that occured when I tried to close Huggle using Ctrl-Q, but I thought I had stopped the reversion process before it finalized. I've rolled back my edits. C(u)w(t)C(c) 17:51, 30 October 2013 (UTC)


 * Could you point that out on Terence's talk page? He's now getting third level warnings and a threat of a block, which I think is very harsh for a new editor still learning the rules. He clearly means well and could be a valuable contributor once he gets the hang of it, if we don't scare him off first. --Nicknack009 (talk) 19:45, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Reversal of edit to UNCITRAL page
There was a typographical error in the 'Legislative Guides' section of the 'United Nations Commission on International Trade Law' page which originally stated "UNICTRAL" but I corrected to "UNCITRAL". You left me a message saying you'd reversed the edit because you decided "it didn’t appear constructive", and now the page is incorrect again.

I would appreciate if you would return to the page and make the correction you undid. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amg2403 (talk • contribs) 18:47, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
 * Returned to the original state, sorry about that. C(u)w(t)C(c) 19:01, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

no worries — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amg2403 (talk • contribs) 19:06, 30 October 2013 (UTC)

Reversal of edit to Biological aspects of fluorine
The cut of that material was a deliberate editorial choice based on article focus. See discussion on talk page.71.127.137.171 (talk) 05:12, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 30 October 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 23:11, 2 November 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 06 November 2013

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 07:08, 9 November 2013 (UTC)