User talk:ContinueWithCaution/Archives/2009/November

November 2009
Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia, it is recommended that you use the preview button before you save; this helps you find any errors you have made, reduces edit conflicts, and prevents clogging up recent changes and the page history. Thank you. Frozen4322 : Chat  03:25, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you for reverting me! There seems to be some issue with my browser, as when I select the edit button from the top of the page, some of the source is cut off and relocated. Once again, thanks! I apologize for the inconvenience. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 03:27, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * No problem, it happens. Frozen4322 : Chat  03:29, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Rollback
I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you can be trusted to use rollback correctly, and for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see New admin school/Rollback and Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:38, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Thank you! Have a happy Thanksgiving. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 03:39, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Christopher_Yao
Hello ContinueWithCaution. I removed the speedy from this article because I felt it doesn't meet the criteria of db-person. Db-person doesn't require notability, it only requires there not to be a claim of fame or notability. There are a few things on there that I feel disqualifies it, 1) the award, 2) the book, and 3) the controversy. I strongly recommend this go to AfD, but I cannot set that up right now.  If you haven't done it by the time I get home, I will.  I explained this all on the talk page.  Thanks and happy editting.--TParis00ap (talk) 07:52, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * not even that--just a plausible claim or indication to some importance or significance. It's a very low bar, deliberately. It doesn't even need any sourcing or evidence. when there's some sort of indication, but you doubt its actual notability, first check for possible sources, and then use PROD or AfD.   DGG ( talk ) 22:27, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Cosmeticcompare.com
Hi..I just overrode your deletion tag on this article Cosmeticcompare.com.The article seems to be genuine as it is one of the price checking services.Thanks.  aru nku mar  checkmate me 12:20, 27 November 2009 (UTC)

Chidi Anthony Opara
Please be careful with rollback. These edits were not vandalism according to WP:VAND. The last of them, which added an example gallery, is probably what looked like vandalism to you, but it was just part of a new user's attempt to add images to an article. That user is the original author of the article. Anyway, this is just a friendly notice, so don't be alarmed. Welcoming the user was still a good idea. ~YellowFives 13:31, 27 November 2009 (UTC)
 * My intent was to revert, not rollback the revision adding the placeholder text. I appreciate your pointing it out to me, and I have apologized to the editor. Cheers, ContinueWithCaution (talk).