User talk:ContinueWithCaution/Archives/2011/November

November 2011
Your addition to User:ContinueWithCaution/dojo.js has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other websites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. It was marked "Copyright (c) 2004-2009, The Dojo Foundation All Rights Reserved" Toddst1 (talk) 00:26, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * From what I recall, the BSD License is considered a free software license and therefore allowed. Dojo Toolkit? ContinueWithCaution (talk) 17:16, 2 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Which is compatible with the GPL. ContinueWithCaution (talk) 19:33, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

 * Thank you! I really appreciate it :) C(u)w(t)C(c) 06:40, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Bebejan
Hi, I declined your proposed deletion of Bebejan. It's destructive and inappropriate to tag a new article for deletion two minutes after its creation because it's not expansive enough and lacks references. Please remember not to bite the noobs! Thanks, Melchoir (talk) 19:39, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I was more concerned with the lack of presented notability, but I do admit I did miss the time of creation, and would have taken that into fuller consideration. Thank you for pointing it out, my apologies, C(u)w(t)C(c) 19:44, 12 November 2011 (UTC).

Many thanks for the barnstar!
I use PILT for RCP. The initial development was successful, but since then it's been eclipsed by Huggle. I still use it, and tinker with it now and again. Philip Trueman (talk) 16:34, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

PMM (particle model of mater)
Hi. I agree with your deletion rationale for the article PMM (particle model of mater), but I think your tagging was a little hasty - 2 minutes isn't really enough time to see what the creator might have been intending to add. I've added a hasty tag to request they be allowed a little time, and if it is not improved it can then be deleted -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 16:56, 13 November 2011 (UTC)
 * My apologies, C(u)w(t)C(c) 16:57, 13 November 2011 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Infinite Campus


A tag has been placed on Infinite Campus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 20:04, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 14 November 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 22:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

My mistake
on the revert to 2011 NBA Lockout. A reminder to Don't template the regulars if you weren't already aware. Thanks for fighting vandals.—Bagumba (talk) 23:13, 14 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Whoops! My apologies. C(u)w(t)C(c) 23:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Clover Food Lab AfD
Hi, I've expanded Clover Food Lab, and the article now has more references that give substantial coverage to the subject. Is there anything further that would help with regard to the article's AfD nomination? Emw (talk) 23:23, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Infinite Campus


A tag has been placed on Infinite Campus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sparthorse (talk) 10:56, 18 November 2011 (UTC)

I believe you are mistaken about deep packet inspection
Unless perhaps you are basing the objection on the fact that the language does not appear in the bill? But I put that in based on this language in the reference provided:

"In addition to domain-name filtering, SOPA would impose an open-ended obligation on Internet Service Providers (ISPs) to prevent access to infringing sites. This means that SOPA would impose an unprecedented responsibility on ISPs to scrutinize and screen all user traffic. Preventing access to specific sites would require ISPs to inspect all the Internet traffic of its entire user base -- the kind of privacy-invasive monitoring that has come under fire in the context of "deep packet inspection" for advertising purposes." I grant you that the authors are lawyers, but they are lawyers who specialize in this field.

Are you saying "require ISPs to inspect all the Internet traffic of its entire user base" != "deep packet inspection"? Please clarify, thanks :) Cause I dunno if you've ever worked with that technology, but that's pretty much what it does. Very process-intensive if you are doing more than working from a few key words and blacklists.

Lemme know. Elinruby (talk) 01:04, 19 November 2011 (UTC)
 * I could be mistaken, but when I read the bill in full a few days ago, it didn't require ISPs to do more than DNS-based filtering. I could be wrong though, so if you think that's the case please let me know. And yeah, deep packet inspection is no fun, I've worked with it and some implementations of it before. I'd be doing more editing, but I've been busy with some IRL things. Cheers, C(u)w(t)C(c) 02:48, 19 November 2011 (UTC)


 * I don't know any more about the legislation requiring it than is in that paragraph, but the authors seem authoritative for the requirement being in there, and all the tech people are saying great wall of china, which definitely *is* deep packet inspection coupled with cache poisoning. i.e. something like (if contains ,then compare to access control list, if on outgoing ACL, drop packet (or send to scary message)). Not that I know what the code is and it's probably an ASIC anyway. But based on your userboxes you see what I mean I think. I have however just had someone else ask about it and perhaps the words themselves lead to distracting questions. I asked him if it was the terminology he was asking about or the fact. I'll see what he says. That discussion is on the article page btw. Elinruby (talk) 03:00, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Infinite Campus.gif
 Thanks for uploading File:Infinite Campus.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:


 * I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions. If you have a question, place a template, along with your question, beneath this message.
 * I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
 * If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
 * To opt out of these bot messages, add  to your talk page.
 * If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 07:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 21 November 2011
Read this Signpost in full &middot; Single-page &middot; Unsubscribe &middot; EdwardsBot (talk) 00:36, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

The Signpost: 28 November 2011

 * Read this Signpost in full
 * Single-page
 * Unsubscribe
 * EdwardsBot (talk) 06:27, 29 November 2011 (UTC)