User talk:Contributer777

HASBRO PAGE COMMENT IS SUBJECTIVE
The following paragraph on the Hasbro page is prolix, subjective, partly irrelevant and calls on the views of one newpaper writer to sustain Hasbro's views. It requires amendment:

"In early August 2020, Hasbro produced a DreamWorks Animation Troll doll device for pre-school age children which had an unadvertised activator on the doll's private parts that caused the device to emit several audio recordings that were questioned by some American mothers; in particular one of them posted a Facebook video stream that went viral. In it, she questioned whether the intent was to groom children for depravity: "It makes a gasping sound when you touch her privates. And to me it's just like sexual sounds, and it's so disturbing. This is 100% why I say that they have been GROOMING kids all along." A Hasbro senior officer for global communications quickly back-pedalled and protested that it was "not intentional" and the company removed the device from the marketplace. A writer for USA Today opined that "We rate the claim that the doll was designed to groom children as PARTLY FALSE."[58]"

The following amendment is proposed:

In early August 2020, Hasbro produced a DreamWorks Animation Troll doll device for pre-school age children which had an activator on the doll's private parts that caused the device to emit several audio recordings that were questioned by some American mothers who believed some audios sounded like a sexual response. A Hasbro senior officer for global communications denied this was the intention, and the company removed the device from the marketplace.