User talk:Conversion script

Articles for deletion nomination of Vegetarian
I have nominated Vegetarian, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Articles for deletion/Vegetarian. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. —  Dæ dαlusContribs 03:52, 29 August 2009 (UTC)

Real user
Clearly, this bot appeared to be an actual real human user. See this edit for example. It clearly comes from a human person sitting behind this indefinitely blocked account, claiming itself to be a bot. It is impossible for a bot to make an edit like that. Also, this bot created many new articles, which also reveal that it was a REAL user. / Hey Mid  (contributions) 21:07, 22 June 2010 (UTC)


 * No, see the user page. Graham 87 06:06, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Winad


The article Winad has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "'Winad' is not mentioned at either entry: this page and the linked redirect Winad (disambiguation) should both be deleted."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 26 September 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Retention for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Retention is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Retention until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Clarityfiend (talk) 11:16, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Amiga Enhanced Chip Set for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amiga Enhanced Chip Set is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Amiga Enhanced Chip Set until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Chidgk1 (talk) 10:48, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

"DeconstructionIsm" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=DeconstructionIsm&redirect=no DeconstructionIsm] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Aaron Liu (talk) 21:29, 1 December 2023 (UTC)

Nomination of Knowbot for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Knowbot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Knowbot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.  Delta  space 42 (talk • contribs) 14:44, 19 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Transport in the Netherlands Antilles


The article Transport in the Netherlands Antilles has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "Fails WP:GNG"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tooncool64 (talk) 22:47, 26 December 2023 (UTC)

"First Gulf War" listed at Redirects for discussion
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Gulf_War&redirect=no First Gulf War] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at  until a consensus is reached. Elli (talk &#124; contribs) 17:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of WiMAX


The article WiMAX has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "This article is misleading, failing to mention that this is obsolete technology that ultimately lost a format war to 4G and 5G networks. It's haphazardly structured, reads like an advertisement in places, and more concerningly, has had update templates saying it's overly jargon-heavy since 2010 (14 years!!) and needs update since 2019 (5 years ago). Many of the sources are from the 2000s and it's full of references to future deployments which almost certainly don't exist. It could be a candidate for rewriting rather than deletion, but frankly, I suspect it's so much work it'd be faster to start again from scratch."

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

''' This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. ''' Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)