User talk:Conway63

September 2013
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to Julia Ford has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.


 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * For help, take a look at the introduction.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this message: Julia Ford was changed by Conway63 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.904506 on 2013-09-25T09:27:22+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 09:27, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

Julia Ford
Hello, thank you for getting involved with Wikipedia. I have reverted (undone) the recent change to the Julia Ford article because it removed both the links in the page, and the reference-citations. Here is the previous version and your edited version. If you open these in separate browser tabs/pages side-by-side, you should be able to see the formatting, layout and information that was lost. Perhaps try to make smaller edits (adding or removing a single sentence at a time) and use the "See changes" and "Preview" features of the main "edit this page" to confirm that nothing major has been lost or changed. In particular, what makes Wikipedia useful are careful links to other pages, and the use of citation references (WP:CITE, WP:V). We also have a comprehensive Manual-of-Style (WP:MOS) to keep formatting and layout consistent. Once again, many appreciations for helping with the Julia Ford page, and please ask any questions and I'll do my best to answer and assist. —Sladen (talk) 10:09, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
 * Hi there
 * I am Julia Ford and wanted to update and provide much more accurate and detailed biog on Wikipedia . Which I thought I had done! But it keeps being " corrected" and editted so as to lose my most interesting professional credits. Any chance of you publishing my own accurate and preferred version?? It's really quite frustrating... Many thanks
 * Julia ford — Preceding unsigned comment added by Conway63 (talk • contribs) 16:06, 25 September 2013 (UTC)


 * Greetings Conway63, thank you for engaging. I, or anyone else, would not be able know if you are Julia Ford—there are as many people who would like to use Wikipedia for damaging others' reputations, as there are those who would like to use Wikipedia for self-promotion.  Luckily for Wikipedia purposes, neither is relevant because we aim to avoid this potential conflict-of-interest (WP:COI) in autobiographical content (WP:AUTOBIO) by instead reporting what reliable third-party sources state.


 * A reliable source can be a newspaper, academic publication, or mainstream magazine/journal (see WP:RS for a list). Keeping to these Wikipedia policies helps to ensure that Wikipedia remains neutral and balanced, and that Wikipedia does not become a source of original research (WP:OR).  We can add information to the Julia Ford article, but only where reliable third-party citation sources support those added statements.  For example, not every rôle or appearance by an actor/actress might be notable (WP:NOTABLE)—we leave the determination of what is notable to the body of available third-party reference works to determine, and summarise and report that.


 * Now, on a slightly more stern note, please could I draw your attention to WP:3RR, the three-revert-rule. Reverting a revert without (very) strong reasons happens infrequently; and doing so twice in a row is even rarer; which is the reason that three times generally results in a block, per the policy.  You are very welcome to help provide citation sources to help expand the Julia Ford article, this would be productive and we can work from those third-party materials.  I have provided before/after links in earlier comment that I believe clearly the disruption caused by edits/reverts; please reflect on these.  Instead raise on the Talk: page (or here), which sentence(s) you believe to be inaccurate.  —Sladen (talk) 17:07, 25 September 2013 (UTC)