User talk:Cook's Kitchen

Welcome!
Hello, Cook&#39;s Kitchen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
 * Introduction and Getting started
 * Contributing to Wikipedia
 * The five pillars of Wikipedia
 * How to edit a page and How to develop articles
 * How to create your first article
 * Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes ( ~ ); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Questions, ask me on my talk page, or, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Zefr (talk) 15:38, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Paid editing
Hello Cook&#39;s Kitchen. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are  required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Cook&. The template Paid can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form:. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. TonyBallioni (talk) 16:06, 10 December 2017 (UTC)
 * My apologies User:TonyBallioni for the delay. I am a member of the legal orgs I started pages for, but am not paid by them. I’ve been looking around for other topics that looked interesting. Is there a resource I could access to read more about how to create pages better? Cook&#39;s Kitchen (talk) 18:30, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Furthermore I work in the real estate (investment) industry on the West coast, do you need the name of the company I work for too? (I haven’t edited anything about them, they’re not really a big deal). Cook&#39;s Kitchen (talk) 18:34, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Also just wanted to verify that I will stop editing as per your request until I am able to clear this up. My apologies again for the delay. Cook&#39;s Kitchen (talk) 19:10, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * Thanks for the reply: if you have not been paid or do not reasonably expect to receive payment, you do not have to disclose. My concerns here are that you have been churning out a lot of articles for commercial and non-profit organizations really quickly in directory entry style formatting, and that have very few mistakes in them. This is not normal for someone who just created an account, and raises concerns that you might have received payment for them as commissioned works. You can see the list of articles that I noted at COIN. Do you have any relationship at all to any of them, and if you do, were you paid to contribute? Also, is this the first Wikipedia account you have operated? TonyBallioni (talk) 22:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
 * I don’t expect to at this point; I had been trying to learn the ropes in order to possibly create a page for a company we invested in, but given what I’m finding out right now I think I’ll not pursue that. I wouldn’t have been paid for that either way. Can I ask what “directly entry style” is? I tend to work offline on things as I’m a perfectionist and am trying hard not to mess up. My apologies if I’m not doing things right. It’s my first time here and got a bit too into it I guess. I’m thinking about what I wrote about and I’m mostly writing about services I use, but I don’t know them personally. Like, I know “of” Ron Suber, but I don’t know him myself and never worked near his circles. I guess the closest would be Paul Bernon whom I met once, but I don’t have any connection with him professionally. I’m glad you contacted me though as I’m definitely learning more about what “not to do”; better to know now than after maybe writing something that wouldn’t have been of any use. Cook&#39;s Kitchen (talk) 00:00, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion
There is currently a discussion at Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:18, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Amin Elhassan


The article Amin Elhassan has been proposed for deletion&#32;because of the following concern: "non notable commentator --"

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.  DGG ( talk ) 05:18, 15 December 2017 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Cosmetic Coffee
Hello, Cook&#39;s Kitchen. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Cosmetic Coffee, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:


 * 1) [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=&action=edit edit the page]
 * 2) remove the text that looks like this:
 * 3) save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kb.au (talk) 00:47, 19 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Cosmetic Coffee for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cosmetic Coffee is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Cosmetic Coffee until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kb.au (talk) 00:43, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Austin Regional Clinic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Austin Regional Clinic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Austin Regional Clinic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.  DGG ( talk ) 08:00, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

File:Austin Regional Clinic logo.png listed for discussion
A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Austin Regional Clinic logo.png, has been listed at Files for discussion. Please see the to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. — Pbrks (talk) 17:00, 29 July 2021 (UTC)