User talk:CookieMonster755/Archives/2022/September

The Signpost: 31 August 2022
 * Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:58, 31 August 2022 (UTC)

Precious anniversary
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)
 * thanks for the precious anniversary! Also I got the new iPhone 14 Pro and love it! cookie monster   755  03:51, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Media's dragging their feet.
I'll wait another 24-hrs, to see if there's a consensus for changing the intro from "Queen consort..." to "Queen..." (with a link to the British consorts list page), since I suspect emotions are still high. Don't know why so many news media, want to treat Queen Camilla so differently from the other 'current' queen consorts. Is it partially, to avoid confusion with Elizabeth II? or partially a 'Diana forever, Camilla never' thing? who knows. GoodDay (talk) 03:43, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I concur. This whole Camilla is queen / not queen but queen consort drama is because of the enduring popularity of the late Diana, Princess of Wales. What the media says is irrelevant. She is legally, and entitled to be called, Her Majesty The Queen. I am not sure why Clarence House is referring to her as Her Majesty The Queen Consort. I don't know if it is temporary to distinguish from her mother-in-law or permanent out of respect for Diana, Princess of Wales. We just don't know yet so we can't speculate per WP:CRYSTALBALL. All I can say is I supported moving it to Queen Camilla per consistency. All other female British consorts are entitled to Her Majesty The Queen and Camilla is not an exception, regardless of what Diana fans and general media think. Thank you for all your hard work regarding this issue, . Hopefully in the next few months we can figure out what is going on. cookie monster   755  03:48, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * No doubt by 2023, the news media will stop repeating the "consort" bit :) GoodDay (talk) 03:57, 18 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank goodness. Whether you like Camilla or not, she is simply Her Majesty The Queen . cookie monster   755  04:00, 18 September 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Massive Dynamic for deletion
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Massive Dynamic is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Articles for deletion/Massive Dynamic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished. Jontesta (talk) 14:39, 27 September 2022 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Keys for Kids Ministeries.png
Thanks for uploading File:Keys for Kids Ministeries.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 29 September 2022 (UTC)