User talk:Cookiethepug

Thank you for all the Oxford commas
Hi, Cookiethepug,

Thank you for inserting all the Oxford commas into Wikipedia articles. And many of the other grammar corrections you made were definitely needed. However, please be careful to review your corrections before publishing them. Several of the changes you made introduced grammatical errors into articles. For example, in the Marty Fields article, you changed "Fields has worked..." to "Fields have worked..." Of course, "Fields" is not plural and so the correct verb is "has." I hope you'll continue participating in Wikipedia editing and tracking down grammatical errors, but please do take care to make sure the corrections you make are needed. Thanks! --Jeremy Butler (talk) 11:04, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * No, actually, no thank you. Do not insert Oxford commas into existing articles per MOS:VAR.  -- Ssilvers (talk) 21:29, 30 July 2021 (UTC)


 * Sorry about this, will be more careful next time.
 * Also please be careful with unnecessary use of the definite article "the". Sometimes it makes no difference, but in some contexts it's unnecessary and makes the wording awkward. While not grammatically incorrect, these edits present stylistic problems. Examples:, . At best these edits create unnecessary wordiness. Otherwise, thanks for your edits. Sundayclose (talk) 16:37, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Sockpuppet investigation
— Bilorv ( talk ) 14:21, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Don't use misleading edit summaries
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. SNUGGUMS (talk / edits) 23:36, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

'''I appreciate the correction and it was not my intention to mislead, but I see now how that would be taken. Thank you for the advice., will be more careful moving forward with these'''--Cookiethepug (talk) 00:57, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Blocked as a sockpuppet
 You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts&#32;as a sockpuppet of User:Ross kramerov&#32;per the evidence presented at Sockpuppet investigations/Ross kramerov. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page:. Bbb23 (talk) 19:40, 21 August 2021 (UTC)