User talk:CoolKatt number 99999/Archive 4

If you are going to leave rude messages, then do not leave any at all -- CoolKatt number 99999.

Get some experience
If this user attempts to edit or request page deletion then ignore it. This one who has several usernames on wikipedia likes everything nice and neat under his own umbrella of speculation. Just check the oddball mergers past the infinate list of pop bands.

Another new start
I know the drill... CoolKatt number 99999 16:13, 20 April 2006 (UTC)

Edit summaries
Hello. Please remember to always provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy editing. TheJabberwock 14:49, 21 April 2006 (UTC)


 * P.S. Thanks for fixing the table at List of backmasked messages, but why did you delink those things? TheJabberwock 14:50, 21 April 2006 (UTC)

Speculation
Will you please stop adding speculation and/or possible predicitons an outcomes to articles, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:47, 6 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Answer, read the poilcy or get reverted. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 06:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry
Apparently you can't protect your talk page. You really need to start replying to your messages and stop ignoring them. CFIF (talk to me) 12:00, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

TV sub-pages
I like to make this stuff up... CoolKatt number 99999 04:47, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
 * WHY? This doesn't show up on Google, does it? If it does, I recommend you place some sort of tag on it. I'd hope people wouldn't be confused by fake articles.--Firsfron 05:13, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

The Shield
Your change to the page The Shield was determined to be unhelpful, and has been removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. Thanks. Kafziel 02:54, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Kafziel 02:57, 10 May 2006 (UTC)

Please Stop
Changing the category titles on TV stations. --CFIF (talk to me) 00:18, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

Regarding call sign meanings
I don't think the W at the beginning of most call signs means "We're". I know in most cases it makes sense, but still, if there is a K at the beginning of the call sign, it doesn't mean anything either. -Whomp 18:56, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

AfD simpson list
At the Afd page for List of TV channels that air The Simpsons, please state a reason to keep.

And why shouldn't we edit this page? How do we leave comments then? -- Chris   Ccool2ax   contrib.  04:12, 17 May 2006 (UTC)
 * That was just a test about no messages CoolKatt number 99999 10:27, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

MfD Notice
Your sub pages have been put up for deletion here. --CFIF (talk to me) 20:39, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Sorry it's had to come to this
Requests for comment/CoolKatt number 99999. --CFIF (talk to me) 21:00, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Help
User:CFIF keeps being uncivil to me. Please help me? CoolKatt number 99999 21:23, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * You're going to have to be more specific. &mdash;David Levy 21:29, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Read his recent edits please. CoolKatt number 99999 21:30, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I did, and I didn't see any incivility. It's possible that I examined edits other than the ones to which you're referring, so please cite them.  &mdash;David Levy 21:36, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Just talk to him please, I tried, but he won't listen. CoolKatt number 99999 21:38, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I'm sorry, but I need you to cite the specific edits in which the user allegedly was uncivil. Otherwise, I'm afraid that I can't help you.  &mdash;David Levy 21:45, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * 
 * 
 * Most of it is by CFIF
 * 
 * Do these help? CoolKatt number 99999 21:48, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Are you joking me? Tell me how #1 Nominating your sub-pages for deletion, #2 Informing you of that, #3 Opening an RfC, #4 Informing you of that, and #5 responding to your uncivility is uncivil. --CFIF (talk to me) 21:57, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Indeed, I don't see any incivility on the part of CFIF. (The mere act of disagreeing with you is not uncivil.)  &mdash;David Levy 22:03, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Still he is bothering me and perhaps Wikistalking me. Could you help me there please? CoolKatt number 99999 22:05, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Let's accuse me some more of something I don't do. --CFIF (talk to me) 22:08, 17 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Thus far, you've failed to corroborate these allegations of wrongdoing. If such evidence exists, please present it as part of the ArbCom case RfC that CFIF filed.  &mdash;David Levy 22:16, 17 May 2006 (UTC)

Hold it. We've gotten to ArbCom? You just started the RFC and skipped Mediation entirely. The Arbitrators are really overworked, so don't add to it. I'm not going to side with either of you because I don't have to. Suspend the ArbCom case and possibly the RfC. CoolKatt, stop claiming incivility, that just exasorbates the issue. CFIF, don't act sour about it ("Let's accuse me some more of something I don't do"), and maybe stay away from CootKatt other than make comments (no more userspace deletion nominations). Let's try something: both of you do that for 48 hours, and then see if you still complain.--HereToHelp 00:35, 18 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Sorry, that was an error on my part. (I meant to type "RfC.")  No ArbCom case has been filed.  &mdash;David Levy 17:10, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

Merging vs. deleting
That's not really what I meant. I think you should perhaps really have some of these pages deleted instead of just pasting them all together (it doesn't look very useful that way to me...). I will leave the issue open for another admin to decide. Kusma (討論) 01:00, 18 May 2006 (UTC)
 * Hello. While I had initially thought that having these subpages was harmless, did you know about this aspect?  I still think it sucks to nominate someone's subpages for deletion, but there are some good reasons to delete (or re-shape) these.  I'd prefer a co-operative outcome rather than some spiral of nastyness, so drop me a line on my talk if yuo want. -  brenneman  {L}  11:52, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

WCTX and WPHL-TV
I am not vandalizing this article...repeat: I AM NOT VANDALISING THIS ARTICLE. Instead, you are (again) adding trivial information. Just because WCTX is imported into Springfield via cable, that doesn't automatically make the station part of the Springfield market. Heck, they don't even ID themselves as such. If you wish to continue to place this line in the article, keep it out of the main section.

While we're at it, WPHL-TV is NOT part of the Harrisburg-Lancaster market either, nor do they identify themselves as such. Just because it, too, is being imported via cable doesn't automatically mean it's one of the area's local stations -- do viewers in New York City claim WTBS or WGN-TV as one of their own? I didn't think so. Rollosmokes 17:50, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

MfD Result Notice
Hi,

I have closed the MfD on your subpages as a "no consensus/default keep." Best wishes, Xoloz 17:45, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

TV Market Templates
The majority opinion, if not consensus, is that out-of-market stations do not belong in the templates. I do not appreciate being called a vandal for going with consensus. I demand an apology. Kirjtc2 19:03, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
 * I apologize for asking for the apology. Real life's been fryaing my nerves the past few days. Kirjtc2 19:43, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Can you please tell me why you insist on including the Seattle stations on Template:Van-Vic TV? Those aren't Vancouver stations. They are Seattle-Tacoma stations. They don't serve Vancouver. They hardly even mention Vancouver; KOMO has a temperature for Vancouver on its weather maps, and that's it. If people are that desperate to find out about the Seattle stations, they can just click on that link at the bottom to go to the Seattle template.

I'm not gonna bother you with the other templates (since, frankly, it's not worth my time), but since Vancouver's my home market, I figure I should at least have some say in it. - Hinto 20:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Just that they're on cable in Van-Vic doesn't necessarily mean they serve Van-Vic. As I mentioned, the extent that KOMO "serves" Vancouver is including Vancouver's temperature on its maps; KING, KIRO, KCPQ, etc. don't even do that. And there's basically no mention of Van-Vic on Seattle stations (and vice versa) unless something big happens. If being on cable is the sole criterion for inclusion on the template, there's a whole bunch of other stations that could be included, but it'd be meaningless. - Hinto 20:26, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

Re: Blueboy96
Coolkatt, you have made me laugh in your effort to stick up for Blueboy. This coming from someone who wastes precious space on Wikipedia with your "alternate history" pages on the Scripps-Howard television stations and of Louisville, largest city of the "Commonwealth of Whore". You can't seem to take constructive criticism when it comes to your edits, so you have the audacity to come at me? PUHLEEZZE!!

In my opinion, Blueboy's edits and additions have bordered on informative (which, when researched and written properly, are helpful) and sloppy (at times he has changed whole sentences, changing the entire continuity and context of paragraphs which someone else, such as myself, has had to clean up and revert). His contributions are as inconsistent as Alex Rodriguez's batting average with runners in scoring position. Blueboy needs to work on this and not be so sensitive. As for you, Coolkatt, you have no right to defend someone else when you are guilty of a whole lot worse. Most of us don't either, including myself. The difference between you and me is that I can accept and answer to criticism, and you can't.

BTW: I have read WP:OWN, and I believe that it applies more to you than to me. Rollosmokes 07:30, 23 May 2006 (UTC)


 * Blueboy's edits are very good. You need to stop reverting his edits Rollosmokes, again because that is violating WP:OWN as well as WP:STALK.

Number one, you obviously (again) did not read my comments directly above this one, which explains my position. Secondly, you didn't have the guts to place this comment on MY TALK PAGE, so you had to run to Blueboy's and post it there. That is, to put it mildly, a weak move on your part. And lastly, I have read WP:STALK, and just as before, this applies more to YOU than it does to me. You're acting like a little child now. This is ridiculous. Rollosmokes 08:35, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Help again
User:Rollosmokes has been bothering both me and User:Blueboy96 over the latter's edits to WTNH. I appreciate Blueboy's edits, but Rollosmokes keeps reverting them everytime I revert to Blueboy's version. It is clear to me that Rollosmokes is violating both WP:OWN and WP:STALK, especially the latter since he has reverted edits by Blueboy in the past. In addition, Rollosmokes has left rather rude comments in both my talk page and Blueboy's talk page over the matter:, , in my talk page he told me I acted like a little child. And here is a link to an edit he reverted: I need your help, he is going too far with this whole thing. CoolKatt number 99999 18:34, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


 * I recently was involved in a similar dispute with Rollosmokes, so I don't feel comfortable intervening in an administrative capacity. Please seek the assistance of another sysop.  If you do, you're welcome cite this edit (in which Rollosmokes referred to me as "a self-absorbed, ego-driven, bombastic blowhard") as another example of his incivility.  &mdash;David Levy 19:00, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

Rollosmokes speaks
I will refer back to an earlier comment:
 * In my opinion, Blueboy's edits and additions have bordered on informative (which, when researched and written properly, are helpful) and sloppy (at times he has changed whole sentences, changing the entire continuity and context of paragraphs which someone else, such as myself, has had to clean up and revert). His contributions are as inconsistent as Alex Rodriguez's batting average with runners in scoring position. Blueboy needs to work on this and not be so sensitive.

This is not an condemnation on all of Blueboy96's contributions. In WTNH-TV, he changed the wording of several sentences which resulted in paragraphs becoming choppy in context. I simply re-wrote or reverted what he changed. For example, he will change single-digit numbers written in word form back to numerical form (eg. "eight" to "8"), which stylistically incorrect.

Coolkatt's problem with me stems from my deleting of his sentences containing what can be viewed as "trivial", such as his favorite "largest (network) station on the UHF dial" reference. I told him that notes such as this should be placed in a separate section within the article, not within the main section.

This is professional, CONSTRUCTIVE CRITICISM. Nothing more and nothing less. Coolkatt has made it personal, so I answered back.

If you're reading this, Mr. Levy, then I apologize for my "incivility" towards you, but at the time that is how I viewed you in regards to our dispute. Rollosmokes 06:42, 25 May 2006 (UTC)


 * You wrote on my talk page: "You are going too far in labeling my edits as vandalism. Stop doing that, and I will also stop labeling your edits as vandalism." The truth is this: your edits ARE VANDALISM.  You are adding nothing but trivial information, poorly-written sentences, and other useless junk into several articles.  You also continue to go tit-for-tat with me on several articles which Blueboy96 and myself have worked extensively.  You are reverting my work out of pure spite.  That is childish.  Like I've said, before you go after someone else, look at yourself in the mirror (before it cracks) and you'll see the REAL CAUSE OF THE PROBLEM.  Rollosmokes 08:46, 6 June 2006 (UTC)

Re:WTAE
Who is we, the only person that has said as such is you, and your the only that incerted it into the article. SOrry to tell you but Wheeling has no ABC affilate, in the boundaries of it's DMA their is no station that servies as an ABC affilate, WTAE is not within those boundaries. The station beeing carried on cable aslo does not make it an affilate for wheeling either, it also can nopt be an affilate becuas it does not have must-carry status either, which means that echa cable company must sign a contract witth the station in order to carry it and are not required to carry it. Yor inclusing that it is caried on cable in another market makes it no more an affilate then when i lived in Lansing, Michigan, and i could get stations from both detroit and Grand Rapids on both cable and OTA, and none of them were Lansing affilates, including the WB and UPN which Lansig at the time did not have. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:34, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

The CW Television Network
Hi. I reverted your most recent edit to The CW Television Network because you failed to provide a citation for your statements, and I would think such a development would have shown up in the admittedly brief Google search I did. So, if you have a valid source, feel free to put your statements back into the article. Thanx! --Maxamegalon2000 01:50, 27 May 2006 (UTC)

Category Sort Letter
Normally I'd agree with you, but WikiProject Television Stations did not. I changed the category sort letters to all be on the first letter because that was the ruling of the project. X Stryker 14:18, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

"Normally I'd agree with you, but WikiProject Television Stations did not." Which, apparently, he doesn't get, which is not an entire surprise. --CFIF (talk to me) 14:08, 30 May 2006 (UTC)

Templates (see WP:RFPP)
I am not going to protect a boatload of templates over two users, stop the edit warring and discuss, I'll have to block any edit warriors. Voice -of- All Talk 22:18, 31 May 2006 (UTC)
 * First of that has hardly an endorcment in rither direction, and to answere your other point, see all of my comments on the project page. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 03:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Hello fellow cat
Just wanted to say hi! :) -- Cat out 14:28, 1 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:Springfield MA TV
I have been observing recent edits to this template, and am concerned that you could be breaking WP:OWN (I know we're talking about a template, but it likely still applies). Your recent addition of a comment-out saying to not remove Hartford stations (the inclusion of those stations seems to be disputed) indicates to me that you may be "owning" at aspect of the template. Please be careful in the future. -- WC  Quidditch  &#9742;   &#9998;  23:28, 3 June 2006 (UTC)


 * And, once again, I changed the template back to what it was before he re-reverted it for the umpteenth time. Rollosmokes 06:12, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Hi CoolKatt, Please stop referring to other editor's work on Wikipedia as vandalism. Thanks in advance, -- Firsfron of Ronchester 19:25, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:Susquehanna Valley TV
Hey, could you take a look at the SV list on that templates' talk page? The station that seems to be under contention (WPHL-TV) is, in fact, significantly viewed in Lancaster County (but only this county) according to the FCC.

In my opinion, this justifies including this station in this market as a "Significantly Viewed Out-of-Market Station", since that is exactly what it is. As you can see from the list, there are also several other stations that could be included in this list. I wouldn't suggest over-doing it, though. :-) AlexDW 00:23, 7 June 2006 (UTC)

Re: Request for Comment on Rollosmokes
I'm not a religious person, but I have only one thing to say to you:

"He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at (him)." (John 8:7 [KJV])

Now, what do you have to say about that? Rollosmokes 06:57, 9 June 2006 (UTC)


 * ==AfD nomination of Requests for comment/Rollosmokes==

Requests for comment/Rollosmokes, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Requests for comment/Rollosmokes satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Rollosmokes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes ( ~ ). You are free to edit the content of Requests for comment/Rollosmokes during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you.


 * I guess this means that I win, and you lose. Next!!  Rollosmokes 07:45, 11 June 2006 (UTC)

Stop it! Just stop it!
Can you just let the discussion on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Television Stations play out? If you are so convinced your way is correct, explain clearly and concisely why, and you may influence consensus in your favor. Please don't impose your will on templates and articles while debate is ongoing, and definitely don't proceed to get into an edit war over it. Reverting exactly three times in 24 hours goes against the spirit of the three-revert rule. I'm getting exasperated with the both of you. Morgan Wick 02:27, 10 June 2006 (UTC)
 * One more thing. People don't have a problem with your subpages because you "want to dream" or anything like that. They have a problem because Wikipedia is not a free host, blog, webspace provider or social networking site. In other words, it's not the place to share your dreams with the world. There are places like that, but Wikipedia isn't one of them. (Personally, I'm neutral on the subpage issue.) Morgan Wick 02:34, 10 June 2006 (UTC)

Network Templates By State
Is there a real point behind this? I just don't see it. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Starsfan23 (talk • contribs)

WTXF-TV
You insist on reverting to a version of this article that YOU edited, and quite poorly. Haven't you learned anything from your failed attempt to bully me? If there is anyone guilty of violating WP:OWN, it is you.

Your version contains a revised paragraph that contains a re-written sentence ("Fox later cancelled its preliminary deal to purchase WGBS and joined the bidding for WCAU in case New World's bid fell through, as New World and Fox looked towards getting Fox programming on a VHF station in America's 4th-largest market") that did not have to be changed; the mention of Fox Kids here is irrelevant and unnecessary; the link to WPSG did not have to be moved; and the link to WTVZ should be changed to TVX Broadcast Group directly, as there is now an article with that title.

I will re-revert to the version that is of better quality. Please do not change it back. Rollosmokes 09:12, 12 June 2006 (UTC)

"I have asked you too many times. Please stop reverting my edits. If that is all you are going to do, then you should not come here."

Why are you taking all of this personally? And, after what you tried to do to me, then why should I listen to you? I'll make this plain and simple -- your edits are crap most of the time. Stop being so sensitive and learn how to be a better writer and editor. Rollosmokes 06:27, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


 * "your edits are crap most of the time."


 * Thank you Rollosmokes, because someone finally had to say it. --CFIF (talk to me) 10:44, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

Other Broadcast Networks
It looks as if we might need two "Others" categories, one for English stations and the other for Spanish and other foreign language stations -- each will have their own share of independent stations included... Because I'm starting to notice that some networks have concentrated affiliations in random areas (i.e.: Template:Univision California, Template:Telefutura California, Template:California Independent Stations and Template:Other California Stations)... Please keep in mind that this decision is for the benefit of those states lacking in such affiliations... What do you think??? --WIKISCRIPPS 07 MON JUN 12 2006 5:26 PM EDT

Reply to my message... I'll be waiting... --WIKISCRIPPS 07 MON JUN 12 2006 5:50 PM EDT

I've got Spanish Arizona on the slate. Template:Spanish Arizona. -Tracker 17:44, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

Possible soultions for the Other Networks in less favorable states
Reply to my message... Then get others involved!!! --WIKISCRIPPS 07 MON JUN 12 2006 6:07 PM EDT

How to hide the I B Templates
Is there a way to hide these templates like the Navbox templates??? --WIKISCRIPPS 07 TUE JUN 13 2006 12:19 PM EDT

If you know somehow that does... Please have them leave me a message!!! --WIKISCRIPPS 07 TUE JUN 13 2006 12:22 PM EDT


 * Nice job with the formatting!!! How did you figure it out??? --WIKISCRIPPS 07 WED JUN 14 2006 2:22 PM EDT


 * I also noticed you displayed a preview with the formatting -- You think you can make the changes to the default template (Template:Intrastate Broadcast)??? WIKISCRIPPS 07 WED JUN 14 2006 2:31 PM EDT


 * No I just checked... It's not there... WIKISCRIPPS 07 WED JUN 14 2006 2:35 PM EDT


 * I can't see the "NavHide" feature on the article... What happened??? --WIKISCRIPPS 07 WED JUN 14 2006 2:41 PM EDT

Thank you for CW/MyTV Arizona move
I wanted to keep it low maintenance. CoolKatt, I didn't know what to do. Did you move Template:MyTV Arizona too? -Tracker 17:45, 14 June 2006 (UTC)

TV station lists by channel number
FYI I just created the last of the lists to go; namely channel 12. Georgia guy 16:17, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Other Station Template in VA.
Hello CoolKatt Number 99999, this is Time1. I would like to thank you for finishing up the template for the television stations in Virginia but I need your help to finish up the Other stations template. Good Job. Time1 16:57, 15 June 2006 (UTC)

Template:PHX TV
I need help at Template:PHX TV. I am running into a wall that I need help with. I need not only someone who lives in Northern Arizona, I also need some work to add station articles, links to more MTs, a portal to Arizona's IBTs, and a cool NavHide for the top.

I really need help here. Meet me at User:TrackerTV/KXRM2X (KXRM2's talk page!) -Tracker 22:35, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

AFD
Please do not nominate AFD pages for deletion. If you want to prevent the article from being deleted, improve it and/or participate in the discussion. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:42, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Please do not remove warnings about inappropriate behavior as vandalism, either. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:45, 19 June 2006 (UTC)

Fox Entertainment Group
Please do not add commercial links (or links to your own private websites) to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thanks. --Sweety Rose 23:26, 20 June 2006 (UTC) Very sorry :) --Sweety Rose 23:42, 20 June 2006 (UTC)

Those WV affiliate templates...
Nice work.  young  american (ahoy-hoy) 03:16, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

PBS Arkansas???
I've lived in Arkansas for 30 years now, and I can honestly say there is no difference in the programming offered on any of the five component stations of the Arkansas Educational Television Network (KETS, KEMV, KETG, KAFT & KTEJ). It's all simulcast from the same broadcast center (with local translators). Creation of a template for the station group — sufficiently grouped under the AETN article — really seems unnecessary, though I do see that it is in line with similar templates for other states. I can only really confidently comment on this particular template's validity. — ArkansasTraveler 15:24, 22 June 2006 (UTC)

Blocked for recreation
I have warned you about this, and this isn't the first time it has been a problem.

Please do not recreate material deleted through the deletion process, such as AFD. In particular, I'm referring to reinserting the content of Cultural references in Pokémon into Pokémon (anime). If you feel that something has been wrongly deleted, please take it to deletion review. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:39, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

I won't do it again. Please unblock me, and I will go WP:DRV. CoolKatt number 99999 02:41, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Fair enough. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * Well, let me edit so I can go to WP:DRV, please. CoolKatt number 99999 02:46, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * You should be unblocked. If there's an autoblock causing troubles, please copy and paste it here so I can deal with it. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:47, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * How do I do that? CoolKatt number 99999 02:48, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * nevermind "Autoblocked because your IP address has been recently used by "CoolKatt number 99999". The reason given for CoolKatt number 99999's block is: "Revert warring to restore deleted material, exacerbated b

Your IP address is 68.21.245.163. " CoolKatt number 99999 02:49, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Help please? CoolKatt number 99999 02:52, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
 * I took care of the autoblock. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 02:56, 24 June 2006 (UTC)