User talk:CoolKidd97

February 2018
Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to The Great Gatsby— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks.  ~Oshwah~  (talk) (contribs)   01:58, 19 February 2018 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Dracula. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:04, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 * If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
 * ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, [ report it here], remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
 * If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
 * The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Dracula was changed by CoolKidd97 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952834 on 2018-02-19T02:04:42+00:00.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at The Catcher in the Rye, you may be blocked from editing. Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: The Catcher in the Rye was changed by CoolKidd97 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.950305 on 2018-02-19T02:10:21+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 02:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)