User talk:Coolacey

The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://communitycupcakes.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 20:36, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Copyright problems with The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation
Hello. Concerning your contribution, The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation, please note that Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images obtained from other web sites or printed material, without the permission of the author(s). This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.stoneandholtweeksfoundation.org/Foundation/Welcome_1.html and http://www.stoneandholtweeksfoundation.org/Foundation/About_Stone_and_Holt.html and http://www.stoneandholtweeksfoundation.org/Foundation/Get_Involved.html and http://www.stoneandholtweeksfoundation.org/Foundation/Join_Together.html. As a copyright violation, The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the Creative Commons Attribution/Share-Alike License (CC-BY-SA) then you should do one of the following:


 * If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation and send an email with the message to . See Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
 * If a note on the original website states that it is licensed under the CC-BY-SA license, leave a note at Talk:The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation with a link to where we can find that note.
 * If you hold the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the CC-BY-SA and GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation.

However, for textual content, you may simply consider rewriting the content in your own words. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 22:20, 16 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation
A tag has been placed on The Stone and Holt Weeks Foundation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding  to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you.  Jolly  Ω   Janner  20:48, 18 June 2010 (UTC)